The visibility of moving images during cardiac
catheterization and treatment may be reduced by a number of factors. First, it
involves multiple movements that occur simultaneously, such as the movements
due to the heart beat and movement of the guide wire used during the treatment.
There is also the influence of the X-ray dose on the image quality in the X-ray
output. If X-rays are irradiated onto moving objects such as a guide wire
moving during treatment of the heart, cardiac catheterization may be displaced
to the next image recorded even when an insufficient X-ray dose has been
irradiated because the imaged object is moving during the time the X-rays are
emitted (pulse width). If the X-ray dose planned to be irradiated to the target
is low, there is also the possibility that noise will appear in the image, and
the imaged object may be lost in noise and visibility be reduced. For this
reason, we conducted basic research into how changes in the speed of rotation
of guide wires affect visibility when wires are positioned horizontally and
vertically, using a dynamic phantom and recorded X-ray moving images. The
purpose of this study is to elucidate whether the deterioration in the
visibility is affected by the X-ray dose, the orientation or movement of a
guide wire, or caused by other conditions, in order to contribute to improving
the visibility in the X-ray moving images. The results showed a lower visual
evaluation only in the vertical direction at the more rapid movement here, but
this did not result in significant changes in the physical evaluation. This
suggests that the structure and characteristics of the human eyes would be
involved, as human vision is stronger with lateral movements and weaker with
vertical movements due to the arrangement of the human eyes, side by side.
Findings from this basic study can be utilized to improve the visibility in the
X-ray moving images by paying attention to the observation environment of the
observer of the X-ray moving images. In addition, the findings of this study
can also be used to determine protocols for improving visibility in X-ray
moving images, such as adjusting the X-ray dose in an X-ray device when further
improvement is required. Therefore, this study was able to provide suggestions
to contribute to the development of improved visibility of X-ray moving images.
References
[1]
Tanaka, R., Shiraishi, J., Takamori, M. and Watari, C. (2011) ROC Analysis for Evaluating the Detectability of Image Unsharpness due to the Patient’s Movement: Phantom Study Comparing Preview and Diagnostic LCDs. Jpn. J. Radiol. Technol, 67, 772-778. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.67.772
[2]
Saragusti, I., Karasik, A., Sharon, I. and Smilansky, U. (2005) Quantitative Analysis of Shape Attributes Based on Contours and Section Profiles in Artifact Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 841-853.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.01.002
[3]
Sato, H., Kittaka, D., Ohsawa, M. and Kato, K. (2019) A Study on Fluoroscopic Images in Exposure Reduction Techniques―Focusing on the Image Quality Of Fluoroscopic Images and Exposure Images. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20, 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12549
[4]
Söderman, M., Mauti, M., Boon, S., et al. (2013) Radiation Dose in Neuroangiography Using Image Noise Reduction Technology: A Population Study Based on 614 Patients. Interventional Neuroradiology, 55, 1365-1372.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1276-0
[5]
Nakamura, S., Kobayashi, T., Funatsu, A., et al. (2016) Patient Radiation Dose Reduction Using an X-Ray Imaging Noise Reduction Technology for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention. Heart and Vessels, 31, 655-663.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0667-z
[6]
Kayikcioglu, T., Gangal, A., Turhal, M. and Kose, C. (2002) A Surface Based Method for Detection of Corronary Boundaries on Poor Quality X-Ray Angiogram Images. Pattern Recognition Letters, 23, 783-802.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(01)00156-8
[7]
Yadava, G.K., Kuhls-Gilcrist, A.T., Rudin, S., Patel, V.K., Hoffmann, K.R. and Bednarek, D.R. (2008) A Practical Exposure-Equivalent Metric for Instrumentation Noise in X-Ray Imaging Systems. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 53, 5107-5121.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/017
[8]
Igawa, M., Nakayama, N. and Maeda, F. (2006) Comparison of Eye Movements While Reading Vertically/Horizontally Arranged Words: Special Feature, 59th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Clinical Ophthalmology (5). Japanese Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology, 60, 1251-1255.
[9]
Arase, M. (2007) Visual Expressions for Editors and Designers. In: Introduction to Editorial Design, 11th Edition, Media Pal, Tokyo, Japan, 1-6.
[10]
Iwashita, T. (1965) Readability of Telop Characters. NHK Institute of Broadcasting Research, 19, 484-491. https://doi.org/10.3169/itej1954.19.484
[11]
Yamakawa, K., Itoh, K., Yumoto, M., Uno, A. and Kaga, K. (2004) Magnetoencephalographic Study on the Recognition Potential: Responses to Vertically and Horizontally Arranged Words and Visual Stimuli. Technical Report of IEICE, 103, 19-24.
[12]
Kajii, N. and Osaka, N. (2000) Optimal Viewing Position in Vertically and Horizontally Presented Japanese Words. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1634-1644.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212161