全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Improved Jet Grouted Grid Form with Horizontal Slab in Liquefaction Mitigation

DOI: 10.4236/ojce.2020.103024, PP. 301-320

Keywords: Liquefaction Mitigation, Jet Grouting, Shaking Table Tests, Numerical Simulation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A chain event of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes caused considerable geotechnical damage related to liquefaction in many places around Kumamoto plain. Many low-rise houses and traditional Japanese style houses, which were constructed on shallow foundation, suffered differential settlement and tilting due to liquefaction. To mitigate the building damages due to the liquefaction, a new countermeasure method of jet grout grid form with a horizontal slab is introduced in this study.?The effectiveness of the proposed technique was evaluated through physical modelling and numerical modelling. As a part of the physical modelling, a set of 1 g shaking table tests for unimproved case and improved case were performed, in which the mitigation effects of the grid form with a horizontal reinforcing slab were examined based on the acceleration, excess pore water pressure ratio as well as ground settlement. Numerical simulation was also performed for assessing the effect of improved method on soil-structure interaction and building settlement during the earthquake. The physical and numerical results confirmed that the grid form with horizontal slab reinforced method is effective in settlement control and offers favorable contribution

References

[1]  Hazarika, H., Kokusho, T., Kayen, R.E., Dashti, S., Fukuoka, H., Ishizawa, T., Kochi, Y., Matsumoto, D., Hirose, T., Furuichi, H., Fujishiro, T., Okamoto, K., Tajiri, M. and Fukuda, M. (2018) Geotechnical Damage Due to the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and Future Challenges. Lowland Technology International, 19, 189-204.
[2]  Wakamatsu, K., Senna, S. and Ozawa K. (2017) Liquefaction during the Kumamoto Earthquakes on April 14 and 16, 2016. Proceedings of the International Workshop on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake, Fukuoka, Japan, 6 March 2017, 123-128.
[3]  Suzuki, Y., Saitoh, S., Onimaru, S., Kimura, G., Uchida, A. and Okumura, R. (1996) Grid-Shaped Stabilized Ground Improved by Deep Cement Mixing Method against Soil Liquefaction for a Building Foundation. Tsuchi-to-Kiso, 44, 46-48. (in Japanese)
[4]  Kitazume, M. (2016) Applications of Centrifuge Modelling to Liquefaction Mitigation Techniques. Proc. of Eurofuge, IFSTTAR, 1-3 June 2016, 1-18.
[5]  Suzuki, K., Babasaki, R. and Suzuki, Y. (1991) Centrifuge Tests on Liquefaction-Proof Foundation. Proc. of the Centrifuge 91’, Colorado, 13-14 June 1991, 1461-1464.
[6]  Babasaki, R., Suzuki, K. and Suzuki, Y. (1992) Centrifuge Tests on Improved Ground for Liquefaction. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, 19-24 July 1992, 1461-1464.
[7]  Ministry of Construction (1999) Design and Construction Manual of Liquefaction Prevention Techniques (Draft). Joint Research Report, Japan, 186. (in Japanese)
[8]  Namikawa, T., Koseki, J. and Suzuki, Y. (2007) Finite Element Analysis of Lattice-Shaped Ground Improvement by Cement-Mixing for Liquefaction Mitigation. Soils and Foundations, 47, 559-576.
https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.559
[9]  Takahashi, H., Kitazume, M. and Ishibashi, S. (2006) Effect of Deep Mixing Wall Spacing on Liquefaction Mitigation. Proceedings International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Hong Kong, 4-6 August 2006, 585-590.
[10]  Isobe, Y., Sekino, M., Takeuchi, J., Oonishi, T. and Nakajima, M. (2019) Numerical Analysis of Liquefaction Countermeasure Method by Hexagonal Grid Form Soil Improvement Using Jet Grouting Method. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 7th ICEGE, Rome, 17-20 June 2019, 3054-3061.
[11]  Koga, Y. and Matsuo, O. (1990) Shaking Table Tests of Embankments Resting on liquefiable Sandy Ground. Soils and Foundations, 30, 162-174.
https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.30.4_162
[12]  Bahmanpour, A., Towhata, I., Sakr, M., Mahmoud, M., Yamamoto, Y. and Yamada, S. (2019) The Effect of Underground Columns on the Mitigation of Liquefaction in Shaking Table Test Model Experiments. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 15-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.022
[13]  Iai, S. (1989) Similitude for Shaking Table Test on Soil-Structure-Fluid Model in 1g Gravitational Field. Soil and Foundations, 29, 105-118.
https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.105
[14]  Liu, L. and Dobry, R. (1997) Seismic Response of Shallow Foundation on Liquefaction Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123, 557-567.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(557)
[15]  Yoshimi, Y. and Tokimatsu, K. (1977) Settlement Buildings on Saturated Sand during Earthquakes. Soil and Foundations, 17, 23-38.
https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.17.23
[16]  Towhata, I. and Rasouli, R. (2013) Attempts to Protect Personal Houses from Seismic Liquefaction Problem. Proceedings of the Seminar on Forensic Geotechnical Engineering, Master Concrete Resurfacing, 10-12 January 2013, 191-209.
[17]  Yasuda, S., Sasaki, S., Noguchi, C. and Ozawa, N. (2013) Shaking Table Tests to Study the Possibility to Prevent Liquefaction-Induced Damage of Houses by Installing Sheet-Piles. Proceedings of 48th Conference of Japanese Geotechnical Society, Toyama, 23-25 July 2013, 1759-1762.
[18]  Dashti, S. and Bray, J.D. (2013) Numerical Simulation of Building Response on Liquefiable Soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139, 1235-1249.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000853
[19]  Kulemeyer, R. and Lysmer, J. (1973) Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 99, 421-427.
[20]  Hudson, M., Idriss, I. and Beirkae, M. (1994) QUAD4M User’S Manual.
[21]  Puebla, H., Byrne, P. M. and Phillips, R. (1997) Analysis of CANLEX Liquefaction Embankments: Prototype and Centrifuge Models. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34, 641-657.
https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-034
[22]  Tsegaye, A. (2010) Plaxis Liquefaction Model. External Report, PLAXIS Knowledge Base.
[23]  Petalas, A. and Galavi, V. (2013) Plaxis Liquefaction Model Ubc3d-Plm. PLAXIS Knowledge Base.
[24]  Beaty, M.H. and Byrne, P.M. (2011) Ubcsand Constitutive Model. Itasca UDM Website 904aR.
[25]  Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., Chung, M. and Riley, M. (1985) Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12, 1425-1445.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)
[26]  Makra, A. (2013) Evaluation of the UBC3D-PLM Constitutive Model for Perdition of Earthquake Induced Liquefaction on Embankment Dams. Delft University of Technology, Nederlands.
[27]  Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1982) Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland.
[28]  Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W. (2004) Semi-Empirical Procedures for Evaluating Liquefaction Potential during Earthquakes. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, and 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Berkely, 7-9 January 2004, 32-56.
[29]  Yoshimi, Y., Tokimatsu, K. and Ohara, J. (1994) In-Situ Liquefaction Resistance of Clean Sands over a Wide Density Range. Geotechnique, 44, 479-494.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1994.44.3.479
[30]  PLAXIS 2D (2019) PLAXIS Material Models CONNECT Edition V20.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133