|
Nursing Science 2020
2013~2017年产科剖宫产手术情况及剖宫产指征变化分析
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨2013~2017年我院孕产妇剖宫产率及剖宫产指征变化。方法:选择我院2013~2017年分娩的孕产妇52,197例,分析自然分娩产妇和剖宫产产妇的一般人口学特征,比较不同年份的剖宫产率和剖宫产指征。结果:不同年龄的孕产妇剖宫产率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),≥35岁产妇剖宫产率明显高于13~23岁和24~34岁(P < 0.05)。不同住院天数的孕产妇剖宫产率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),住院8~15天和≥15天的产妇剖宫产率明显高于1~3天和4~7天(P < 0.05)。我院剖宫产率为56.28%,2013~2016年呈逐年下降趋势,2017年有所上升。剖宫产指征前3位是瘢痕子宫、胎膜早破、重度子痫。结论:我院剖宫产率仍较高,瘢痕子宫仍是剖宫产的主要原因。
Objective: To investigate the cesarean section rate and changes of indications in the hospital from 2013 to 2017. Methods: 52,197 pregnant and lying-in women who delivered in the hospital from 2013 to 2017 were enrolled in the study. The general demographic characteristics of women un-dergoing natural delivery and cesarean section were compared. The cesarean section rates and ce-sarean section indications in different years were compared. Results: There were significant dif-ferences in cesarean section rate between different age groups (P < 0.05). The cesarean section rate of women ≥ 35 years old was significantly higher than that of women aged 13 - 23 years old and 24 - 34 years old (P < 0.05). There were also significant differences in cesarean section rate between women with different hospital days (P < 0.05). The cesarean section rates of women hospitalized for 8 - 15 days and ≥ 15 days were significantly higher than those hospitalized for 1 - 3 days and 4 - 7 days (P < 0.05). The rate of cesarean section in the hospital was 56.28%. It showed a downward trend year by year from 2013 to 2016 and increased in 2017. The top 3 indications for cesarean section were scarred uterus, premature rupture of membranes and severe pre-eclampsia. Conclu-sion: Cesarean section rate in the hospital is relatively higher and scarred uterus is the main reason for cesarean section.
[1] | 王群, 王汉陵. 2014~2016年剖宫产率、妊娠结局及剖宫产指征的变化特点[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(5): 2193-2195. |
[2] | 刘少霞, 陈佩. 2013~2015年咸水沽医院剖宫产率及剖宫产指征变化分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(4): 1651-1653. |
[3] | 张国华, 曹琴英, 王岩, 等. 综合干预措施降低剖宫产率研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(1): 119-122. |
[4] | 林虎. 我国剖宫产现状及思考[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2015, 45(11): 849-852. |
[5] | Kupari, M., Talola, N., Luukkaala, T., et al. (2016) Does an Increased Cesarean Section Rate Improve Neonatal Outcome in Term Pregnancies? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 294, 41-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3942-4 |
[6] | Yu, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, C., et al. (2017) Reducing the Rate of Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request through Institutional and Policy Interventions in Wenzhou, China. PLoS ONE, 12, 1863-1864.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186304 |
[7] | 包春荣, 余自成, 丁佩芳, 等. 全面二孩政策实施后剖宫产率、妊娠并发症和不良妊娠结局的变化[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(4): 725-727. |
[8] | 罗灿, 钟银莉, 陈婷婷, 等. 运用Robson分类法比较广东某妇产医院2011-2015年剖宫产情况[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2017, 34(5): 795-797. |
[9] | 吴朝勇, 阮秀兰, 赵坚. 应用罗布森分类法的剖宫产率分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(10): 1060-1061. |
[10] | 张静, 何琼, 刘慧悦, 等. 某院2012~2015年产科住院病人疾病谱及剖宫产指征变化分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2017, 34(4): 602-603. |
[11] | 曹杰, 田立碧, 胡尚英, 等. 孕妇胎膜早破对分娩结局和新生儿的影响[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2017, 28(8): 967-969. |
[12] | 李东晖, 高玉洁, 黄艳波, 等. 胎膜早破与分娩方式的关系及对围生儿的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2014, 21(5): 44-45, 48. |
[13] | 武鹤立, 桑霞. 抗生素应用时间对胎膜早破分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国基层医药, 2013, 20(2): 223-224. |
[14] | 黄健媚. 胎膜早破与分娩方式的关系探讨[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2017, 27(22): 91-92. |
[15] | 王文凯, 郭文斌, 叶露. 右美托咪定用于重度子痫前期患者剖宫产术中镇静的适宜剂量探讨[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(7): 1064-1067. |
[16] | 伍邵文, 李光辉, 邹丽颖, 等. 重度子痫前期分娩安全性的多中心研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(2): 190-194. |
[17] | 崔健. 41例重度子痫前期患者剖宫产的临床处理体会[J]. 临床研究, 2018, 26(4): 192-193. |
[18] | 沈红, 程蔚蔚, 陈一飞. 脂蛋白酯酶在重度子痫前期胎盘和脐血中的表达及与其子代代谢异常的关系[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2014, 30(1): 39-42. |
[19] | 侯磊, 李光辉, 邹丽颖, 等. 全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(10): 728-735. |
[20] | 杨太清. “二孩政策”实施前后剖宫产率及剖宫产指征得变化分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2016, 27(4): 518-520. |