全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

山东省主要土壤防洪减灾和生产功能价值研究
Study on the Value of Soil Flood Control and Disaster Reduction and Production Function in Shandong Province

DOI: 10.12677/AG.2020.105033, PP. 365-373

Keywords: 山东省,土壤类型,功能价值,货币化
Shandong Province
, Soil Type, Functional Value, Monetization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

土壤是重要的自然资源,但对其功能价值方面的研究却一直缺乏重视。为研究土壤的功能价值,本文以山东省8类土壤为研究对象,通过搜集土壤的理化性质等指标,对各类土壤的有效田间持水量和平均有机质含量进行计算,进而对各类土壤的防洪减灾和生产功能价值进行货币化计量。研究结果表明,山东省土壤的防洪减灾功能价值普遍偏高,处于874.67~1423.34元/公顷之间。其中褐土最高,为1423.34元/公顷。各类型土壤的生产功能价值差异较大,在3040.42~18387.94元/公顷之间。褐土的生产功能价值最高,为18387.94元/公顷,高于平均值的82.6%;其次是砂姜黑土和棕壤。土壤功能价值的计算有利于为土壤资源的合理利用提供参考依据,最大限度地发挥土壤的作用。
Soil is an important natural resource, but studies on its value on function had been neglected. In order to study the value of soil, in this paper eight types of soil in Shandong province were se-lected as the research object. The available field capacity and average organic matter content of every soils were calculated by collecting physical and chemical properties of the soils, and then the value of flood control and disaster reduction and production of all kinds of soil were mone-tized. The results show that the value of flood control and disaster reduction and in Shandong province is generally high, ranging from 874.67 - 1423.34 yuan/ha, and Cinnamon soil is the highest at 1423.34 yuan/ha. The production function value of each type of soil varies greatly, ranging from 3040.42 to 18387.94 yuan/ha. Cinnamon soil has the highest value of production function at 18387.94 yuan/ha, which is higher than 82.6% of the average value, followed by Shajiang black soil and Brown soil. The calculation of soil value could provide reference for the rational utilization of soil resources and maximize the role of soil.

References

[1]  吴新民, 潘根兴. 自然价值的形成与评价方法浅议[J]. 经济地理, 2003, 23(3): 323-326.
[2]  张志强, 徐忠民, 程国栋. 生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(11): 1918-1926.
[3]  Gretchen C. Daily, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 保障自然资本与人类福祉: 中国的创新与影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 669-676.
[4]  席增雷. 土壤自然资本价值计量研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017: 1-80.
[5]  尤南山, 蒙古军, 李枫, 等. 1980-2017年中国土地资源学发展研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017(11): 4-15.
[6]  张学雷. 土壤多样性: 土壤地理学研究的契机[J]. 土壤, 2014(1): 1-6.
[7]  朱阿兴, 杨琳, 樊乃卿, 等. 数字土壤制图研究综述与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 66-78.
[8]  刘洋, 王爱国. 自然资本核算研究的理论与方法综述[J]. 会计之友, 2019(3): 26-31.
[9]  李世聪, 易旭东. 生态资本价值核算理论研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2005(9X): 4-6.
[10]  罗华伟, 姜雅勤. 自然资源资产生态价值计量: 理论与案例[J]. 会计之友, 2019(22): 104-110.
[11]  史学正, 梁音, 于东升. “土壤水库”的合理调用与防洪减灾[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1999(3): 6-10.
[12]  钱胜国. 土壤田间持水量理论公式的探讨[J]. 土壤学报, 1985(3): 233-240.
[13]  中国水利年鉴编纂委员会. 中国水利年鉴(2011)[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2011: 400-552.
[14]  赵其国. 珍惜和保护土壤资源: 我们义不容辞的责任[J]. 科技导报, 2016, 34(20): 66-73.
[15]  Pacheco, F.A.L. (2020) Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: The Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts. Sustainability, 12, 1163.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031163

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133