全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

乌司他丁对感染所致急性循环衰竭患者微循环的影响
UTI Influence on Microcirculation in Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure Caused by Infection

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2020.105113, PP. 733-740

Keywords: 乌司他丁,感染,急性循环衰竭,休克,感染性休克
UTI
, Infection, Acute Circulatory Failure, Shock, Septic Shock

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探究乌司他丁能否通过改善感染所致急性循环衰竭患者的微循环灌注从而改善其预后。方法:1)收集2018~5至2019~12入住青岛大学附属医院综合ICU及急诊ICU感染所致急性微循环衰竭患者共50例,随机将其分为对照组25例(仅接受常规治疗)和实验组25例(乌司他丁 + 常规治疗)。2) 分别用LH-SDF-1型SDF观测仪(徐州利华电子科技发展有限公司)观察对照组和实验组患者0 h、3 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h、72 h的舌下微循环状态,分别计算出相应微血管流动指数(MFI)、总血管密度(TVD)、灌注血管密度(PVD)、灌注血管比例(PPV)。3) 分别统计出两组患者的各自的72小时ΔSOFA、30天全因病死率。4) 所获得的数据采用SPSS22软件针对各组定量数据进行独立样本t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验,P < 0.05视为有统计学差异。结果:1) 乌司他丁组的用药48小时后微循环指标明显高于常规对照组(P均 < 0.05,详见正文)。2) 乌司他丁组的72小时ΔSOFA要明显高于常规对照组(P = 0.005, t = 2.980);乌司他丁组中30天死亡率为8%,常规对照组中30天死亡率为24%。结论:与常规对照组治疗相比,加用乌司他丁能够改善感染所致急性循环衰竭患者用药后48小时的所有微血管指标,能够明显地改善72小时SOFA评分,从而改善30天预后。
Objective: To explore whether Ulinastatin (UTI) can improve microcirculation in patients with acute circulatory failure caused by infection to improve their prognosis. Methods: 1) Collect 50 patients with acute circulatory failure caused by infection which were admitted to intensive care unit in Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University during 2018-5 to 2019-12. They were randomly divided into 25 control group and 25 UTI group. The control group received conventional treatment, and the UTI group was on the basis of conventional therapy plus UTI. 2) Use LH-SDF-1 type SDF observer (Xuzhou Lihua Electronic Technology Development Co., Ltd.) to observe control group and UTI group patients’ sublingual microcirculation at the time point of 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, then calculate microvascular flow index (MFI), total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV). 3) The 72 hours of ΔSequential Organ Failure Assessment (ΔSOFA) and 30 days of all-cause mortality in the two groups were calculated. 4) Independent samples t-test was performed for each group of quantitative data by the software of SPSS 22nd edition. χ2 test was used to compare rates for each group. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 1) The results show that 48 hours microcirculatory situation in the UTI group is higher than the control group (P < 0.05, see in the next). 2) The 72 hours ΔSOFA in the UTI group is higher than the control group (P = 0.005, t = 2.980). The 30-day mortality rate in the UTI group is 8% and in the control group is 24%. Conclusion: Compared with the conventional control group, plus UTI can improve all microcirculation indicators after dosing for 48 hours. It can also improve 72 hours SOFA scores obviously thereby improving the prognosis of 30 days.

References

[1]  Cecconi, M., Debacker, D., Antonlli, M., et al. (2014) Consensus on Circulatory Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring. Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Medicine, 40, 1795-1815.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
[2]  Vincent, J.L. and De Backer, D. (2013) Circulatory Shock. New England Journal of Medicine, 369, 1726-1734.
[3]  Namkje, A.R., Vellinga, M.D., et al. (2015) International Study on Microcirculatory Shock Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients*. Clinical Investigations, 11, 48-52.
[4]  Leone, M., Blidi, S., Antonini, F., et al. (2009) Oxygen Tissue Saturation Is Lower in Nonsurvivors Than in Survivors after Early Resuscitation of Septic Shock. Anesthesiology, 111, 366-371.
https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181aae72d
[5]  Xiao, S.H., et al. (2018) Curative Efficacy and Safety of Tra-ditional Chinese Medicine Xuebijing Injections Combined with Ulinastatin for Treating Sepsis in the Chinese Population: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 97, e10971.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010971
[6]  丘文凤, 温小敏. 动态检测降钙素原、急性生理与慢性健康评分及序贯器官衰竭评估评分在严重脓毒症患者中的预后评估及相关性研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019. 26(33): 83-86.
[7]  Singer, M., et al. (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sep-sis-3). JAMA, 315, 801-810.
[8]  Hariri, G., et al. (2019) Narrative Review: Clinical Assessment of Peripheral Tissue Perfusion in Septic Shock. Annals of Intensive Care, 9, 37.
[9]  Medam, S., et al. (2017) Risk Factors for Death in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Trauma and Non-Trauma Patients. Medicine (Baltimore), 96, e9241.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000009241
[10]  高静, 刘磊, 王亮亮. 血必净联合乌司他丁治疗感染性休克临床观察[J]. 安徽中医药大学学报, 2019. 38(4): 33-36.
[11]  Xu, Q., Yan, Q. and Chen, S. (2019) Use of Ulinastatin Was Associated with Reduced Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 11, 1911-1918.
https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.05.03
[12]  Pan, P., et al. (2018) Role of Combining Peripheral with Sublingual Perfusion on Evaluating Microcirculation and Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Septic Shock. Chinese Medical Journal, 131, 1158-1166.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.231524
[13]  De Backer, D., et al. (2007) How to Evaluate the Microcirculation: Report of a Round Table Conference. Critical Care, 11, R101.
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6118
[14]  Massey, M.J. and Shapiro, N.I. (2016) A Guide to Human In Vivo Microcirculatory Flow Image Analysis. Critical Care, 20, 35.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1213-9

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133