全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

双线地铁隧道下卧粉质黏土动力稳定性研究
Study on Dynamic Characteristics of the Underlying Silty Clay of Double-Track Subway Tunnel

DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2020.95050, PP. 469-477

Keywords: 地铁隧道,双线,动力特性,粉质黏土,数值分析
Subway Tunnel
, Double-Track, Dynamic Characteristics, Silty Clay, Numerical Simulation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为研究地铁双线隧道下卧粉质黏土地层动力响应特性,采用数值计算方法,分析了列车循环荷载作用下双线隧道下卧土层中加速度峰值、沉降变形等的变化规律。结果表明:1) 循环荷载作用下双线隧道下卧土体的动力响应随距离增加而逐渐衰减,且沿深度方向衰减速度小于沿水平向的衰减速度(深度方向衰减速率约为水平向的1/2),循环荷载对双线隧道下卧土层叠加效应主要体现在深度方向上。2) 双线隧道中任一隧道正下方分析点的动力响应值大于单线隧道下对应分析点的值,其中竖向加速度峰值之比介于1.55~1.87,竖向速度峰值之比介于1.68~1.70。
A double-track circular subway tunnel in silty clay layer was analyzed by using numerical calculation method, the max. acceleration and settlement deformation in the underlying soil of the double-track tunnel under cyclic load were obtained. The results show that 1) under the cyclic load, the dynamic response of the underlying soil of the double-track tunnel decreases gradually with the increase of distance, and the attenuation rate along the depth direction is less than that along the horizontal direction. The attenuation rate along the depth direction is about 1/2 of the rate along the horizontal direction. The superposition effect of the double-track tunnel is mainly reflected in the depth direction. 2) The dynamic response of the underlying soil of the double-track tunnel is greater than that of the single-track tunnel, in which the ratio of the peak vertical acceleration is in 1.55 - 1.87 and the ratio of the peak vertical velocity is between 1.68 and 1.70.

References

[1]  孙统立, 李浩, 吕虎, 韦良文. 双圆盾构施工扰动引起的地表位移特性分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2009, 42(6): 108-114.
[2]  Huang, Q., Huang, H.-W., Ye, B., Zhang, D.W., Gu, L.L. and Zhang, F. (2017) Dynamic Response and Long-Term Settlement of a Metro Tunnel in Saturated Clay Due to Moving Train Load. Soils and Foundations, 57, 1059-1075.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.031
[3]  刘志强, 王飞, 姚博. 地铁隧道下卧土体动力特性模型试验研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2011, 156(9): 92-96.
[4]  张伟伟, 金先龙, 曹露芬, 王建炜, 王新. 列车动载下双线隧道联络通道动力响应数值分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2013, 35(4): 114-120.
[5]  包小华, 李攀, 崔宏志, 朱合华. 地铁隧道运营中复杂软土地层的动力响应[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(5): 53-60.
[6]  马学勇, 张巍, 任家涛, 朱守兵, 朱鸿鹄. 单圆双线地铁隧道基底粉细砂层动力响应分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2019, 39(1): 106-116.
[7]  Tang, Y.Q., Cui, Z.D., Zhang, X. and Zhao, S.K. (2008) Dynamic Response and Pore Pressure Model of the Saturated Soft Clay around the Tunnel under Vibration Loading of Shanghai Subway. Engineering Geology, 98, 126-132.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.014
[8]  杨兵明, 刘保国. 地铁列车循环荷载下软土地区盾构隧道长期沉降分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2016, 37(3): 61-67.
[9]  李健斌, 陈健, 罗红星, 程红战, 胡之锋, 黄珏皓, 张善凯. 基于随机场理论的双线盾构隧道地层变形分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(7): 1748-1765.
[10]  王飞. 软土隧道下卧土体动力响应研究[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133