全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于LCA理论的厂拌热再生沥青混合料环境效益评价
Environmental Benefit Evaluation of Plant Mix Hot Recycled Asphalt Mixture Based on LCA Theory

DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2020.103042, PP. 362-373

Keywords: 生命周期分析,厂拌热再生技术,沥青混合料,环境效益
Life Cycle Assessment
, Hot Plant-Mix Recycling Technology, Asphalt Mixture, Environmental Benefits

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了系统评价厂拌热再生沥青混合料在实际工程中的环境效益,将混合料生产施工划分为旧路面铣刨、原材料生产、混合料施工三阶段,基于生命周期分析理论计算其生产施工过程中的能耗及CO2当量排放。研究表明:随RAP掺量的增加,厂拌热再生混合料能耗及CO2当量排放逐渐降低;混合料生产施工过程中能耗及碳排放占比混合料拌和 > 原材料生产 > 混合料运输 > 混合料摊铺压实 > 旧路面铣刨,其中原材料生产及混合料拌和两阶段产生的能耗及碳排放占比尤为突出,约为总能耗的84.4%总碳排放的80.8%;相比于普通的热拌沥青混合料,当RAP掺量低于20%时,再生混合料的能耗及CO2当量排放略高,当RAP掺量为30%~60%时,再生混合料能够降低能耗3.2%~10.0%,减少CO2当量排放0.33%~3.05%,环境效益显著。
In order to systematically evaluate the environmental benefits of the plant mix hot recycling asphalt mixture in the actual project, the mixture production and construction are divided into three stages: old pavement milling, raw material production and mixture construction. Based on the life cycle analysis theory, the energy consumption and CO2 equivalent emissions in the production and construction process are calculated. The results show that: with the increase of rap content, the energy consumption and CO2 equivalent emission of the plant mix hot recycling mixture decrease gradually; the proportion of energy consumption and carbon emission in the process of mixture production and construction is mixture mixing > raw material production > mixture transportation > mixture paving and compaction > old pavement milling, especially in the two stages of raw material production and mixture mixing. It is about 84.4% of the total energy consumption and 80.8% of the total carbon emission. Compared with the ordinary hot mix asphalt mixture, when the rap content is less than 20%, the energy consumption and CO2 equivalent emission of the recycled mixture are slightly higher. When the rap content is 30% - 60%, the recycled mixture can reduce the energy consumption by 3.2% - 10.0% and CO2 equivalent emission by 0.33% - 3.05%, which has significant environmental benefits.

References

[1]  张争奇, 张苛, 姚晓光. 厂拌热再生技术能耗与排放量化分析[J]. 江苏大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 36(5): 615-620.
[2]  毕连居, 赵博, 蔡海泉. 沥青路面热再生技术环境效益分析研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(11): 44-47.
[3]  魏义青. 沥青路面建设节能减排评价指标研究[J]. 公路交通技术, 2014(4): 45-48.
[4]  杨博. 基于生命周期分析的沥青路面节能减排量化分析方法及评价体系研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2012.
[5]  Chowdhury, R., Apul, D. and Fry, T. (2010) A Life Cycle Based Environmental Impacts Assessment of Construction Materials Used in Road Construction. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 54, 250-255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.007
[6]  Temren, Z. and Sonmez, I. (2012) A Study on Energy Con-sumption and Carbon Footprint of Asphalt and Concrete Mixtures. 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Istan-bul.
[7]  Wang, T., Harvey, J. and Kendall, A. (2014) Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Strategic Man-agement of Highway Pavement Roughness. Environmental Research Letters, 9, Article ID: 034007.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034007
[8]  Santos, J., Ferreira, A. and Flintsch, G. (2015) A Life Cycle Assessment Model for Pavement Management: Methodology and Computational Framework. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16, 268-286.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.942861
[9]  Jullien, A., Moneron, P., Quaranta, G., et al. (2006) Air Emissions from Pavement Layers Composed of Varying Rates of Reclaimed Asphalt. Resources Conservation & Re-cycling, 47, 356-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.09.004
[10]  Mcrobert, J., Evans, C. and Sharp, K. (2012) Carbon and Asphalt: A Review of Environmental Factors Including Emission Calculators.
[11]  Santero, N.J., Masanet, E. and Horvath, A. (2011) Life-Cycle Assessment of Pavements. Part I: Critical Review. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 55, 801-809.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010
[12]  Yu, B., Lu, Q. and Xu, J. (2013) An Improved Pavement Maintenance Optimization Methodology: Integrating LCA and LCCA. Transportation Research Part a Policy & Practice, 55, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.07.004
[13]  卢海涛. 高速公路全生命周期能耗统计模型研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2011.
[14]  潘美萍. 基于LCA的高速公路能耗与碳排放计算方法研究及应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2011.
[15]  杨博, 张争奇, 张慧鲜. 沥青路面节能减排量化评价方法[J]. 公路交通科技, 2014, 31(1): 32-38.
[16]  姚玉权, 仰建岗, 蒋煜. 基于LCA厂拌热再生施工技术环境效益计算与分析[J]. 交通节能与环保, 2019, 15(1): 68-72.
[17]  中国统计局. 中国能源统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011: 89-95.
[18]  IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (2001) Life Cycle Assessment of Road. IVL Report, 22-50.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133