全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
投递稿件

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

同伴在场使青少年更爱冒险：来自脑科学研究的证据
Peer Presence Makes Adolescents More Risk Taking: Evidence from Brain Science Research

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.107107, PP. 897-904

Keywords: 同伴在场，青少年，冒险行为，神经机制
Peer Presence, Adolescents, Risk Taking, Neural Mechanism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

青春期是冲动冒险的高发期，从事冒险行为不仅会给青少年的健康发展造成极大威胁，也可能会威胁社会的稳定发展。已有研究证实，相比于独自一人，同伴在场会加剧青少年的冒险决策。基于双系统模型和三角模型的观点，神经科学的研究也发现，同伴在场可能会通过增强奖励敏感性，降低认知控制水平来影响青少年冒险行为。未来研究可从神经动态网络层面继续完善同伴在场影响冒险行为的脑机制研究，进一步规范同伴在场的操纵，并重视青少年冒险行为的本土化研究。
Adolescence is a high incidence period of impulsive risk-taking. Engaging in risk-taking behavior will pose a great threat not only to the healthy development of teenagers, but also to the stable development of society. Studies have shown that peer presence exacerbates teenagers’ risky decisions than being alone. According to two-system model and triangular model, neuroscience studies have also found that peer presence may influence adolescent risk-taking behavior by enhancing reward sensitivity and reducing the level of cognitive control. Future research can continue to improve the brain mechanism of peer presence influencing risk-taking behavior from the perspective of neural dynamic network, further standardize peer presence manipulation, and pay attention to the localization study of adolescent risk-taking behavior.

References

[1]  窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 黎建斌(2014). 自我损耗促进冒险行为. 心理科学, 37(1), 150-155.
[2]  田录梅, 袁竞驰, 李永梅(2018). 同伴在场和自尊水平对青少年冒险行为的影响:来自ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 50(1), 47-57.
[3]  夏大勇(2016). 自尊水平与同伴在场对青少年冒险行为的影响.. 硕士论文, 山东师范大学, 济南.
[4]  张颖, 冯廷勇(2014). 青少年风险决策的发展认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1139-1148.
[5]  Breiner, K., Li, A. F., Cohen, A. O., Steinberg, L., Bonnie, R. J., Scott, E. S. et al. (2018). Combined Effects of Peer Presence, Social Cues, and Rewards on Cognitive Control in Adolescents. Developmental Psychobiology, 60, 292-302.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21599
[6]  Brooks-Russell, A., Simons-Morton, B., Haynie, D., Farhat, T., & Wang, J. (2014). Longitudinal Relationship between Drinking with Peers, Descriptive Norms, and Adolescent Alcohol use. Prevention Science, 15, 497-505.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0391-9
[7]  Casey, B., Galvan, A., & Somerville, L. H. (2016). Beyond Simple Models of Adolescence to an Integrated Circuit-Based Account: A Commentary. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 128-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.006
[8]  Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Peers Increase Adolescent Risk Taking by Enhancing Activity in the Brain’s Reward Circuitry. Developmental Science, 14, F1-F10.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x
[9]  Chen, X. Y., & French, D. C. (2008). Children’s Social Competence in Cultural Context. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 591-616.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093606
[10]  Cohen, A. O., Breiner, K., Steinberg, L., Bonnie, R. J., Scott, E. S., Taylor-Thompson, K. A. et al. (2016). When Is an Adolescent an Adult? Assessing Cognitive Control in Emotional and Nonemotional Contexts. Psychological Science, 27, 549-562.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615627625
[11]  De Boer, A., Peeters, M., & Koning, I. (2017). An Experimental Study of Risk Taking Behavior among Adolescents: A Closer Look at Peer and Sex Influences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 1125-1141.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616648453
[12]  Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Dalmaijer, E. S., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2019). Is the Peer Presence Effect on Heightened Adolescent Risky Decision-Making Only Present in Males? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 693-705.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01179-9
[13]  Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2015). A Meta-Analysis on Age Differences in Risky Decision Making: Adolescents versus Children and Adults. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 48-84.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038088
[14]  Ernst, M., & Fudge, J. L. (2009). A Developmental Neurobiological Model of Motivated Behavior: Anatomy, Connectivity and Ontogeny of the Triadic Nodes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 367-382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.009
[15]  Ernst, M., Pine, D. S., & Hardin, M. (2006). Triadic Model of the Neurobiology of Motivated Behavior in Adolescence. Psychological Medicine, 36, 299-312.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291705005891
[16]  Fischer, P., Kastenmueller, A., & Asal, K. (2012). Ego Depletion Increases Risk-Taking. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 623-638.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.683894
[17]  Gullone, E., Moore, S., Moss, S., & Boyd, C. (2000). The Adolescent Risk-Taking Questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 231-250.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558400152003
[18]  Jia, Y., Way, N., Ling, G., Yoshikawa, H., Chen, X., Hughes, D. et al. (2009). The Influence of Student Perceptions of School Climate on Socioemotional and Academic Adjustment: A Comparison of Chinese and American Adolescents. Child Development, 80, 1514-1530.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01348.x
[19]  Kahn, R. E., Holmes, C., Farley, J. P., & Kim-Spoon, J. (2015). Delay Discounting Mediates Parent-Adolescent Relationship Quality and Risky Sexual Behavior for Low Self-Control Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1674-1687.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0332-y
[20]  Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B. et al. (2018). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2017. Mmwr Surveillance Summaries, 67, 1-114.
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1
[21]  Kessler, L., Hewig, J., Weichold, K., Silbereisen, R. K., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2017). Feedback Negativity and Decision-Making Behavior in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in Adolescents Is Modulated by Peer Presence. Psychophysiology, 54, 260-269.
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12783
[22]  Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L. et al. (2002). Evaluation of a Behavioral Measure of Risk Taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
[23]  Logue, S., Chein, J., Gould, T., Holliday, E., & Steinberg, L. (2014). Adolescent Mice, Unlike Adults, Consume More Alcohol in the Presence of Peers than Alone. Developmental Science, 17, 79-85.
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12101
[24]  Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H. et al. (2011). A Gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2693-2698.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
[25]  Mun, C. J., Dishion, T. J., Tein, J. Y., & Otten, R. (2018). Adolescence Effortful Control as a Mediator between Family Ecology and Problematic Substance Use in Early Adulthood: A 16-Year Prospective Study. Development and Psychopathology, 30, 1355-1369.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417001742
[26]  O’Brien, L., Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Adolescents Prefer More Immediate Rewards When in the Presence of Their Peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 747-753.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00738.x
[27]  Ozdemir, Y., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Cok, F. (2013). Parenting Processes and Aggression: The Role of Self-Control among Turkish Adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 65-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.09.004
[28]  ？zmen, O., & Sumer, Z. H. (2011). Predictors of Risk-Taking Behaviors among Turkish Adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 4-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.015
[29]  Qu, Y., Lin, L. C., & Telzer, E. H. (2019). Culture Modulates the Neural Correlates Underlying Risky Exploration. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00171
[30]  Reniers, R., Beavan, A., Keogan, L., Furneaux, A., Mayhew, S., & Wood, S. J. (2017). Is It All in the Reward? Peers Influence risk-Taking Behaviour in Young Adulthood. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 276-295.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12195
[31]  Ryan, K. K., MacKillop, J., & Carpenter, M. J. (2013). The Relationship between Impulsivity, Risk-Taking Propensity and Nicotine Dependence among Older Adolescent Smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 38, 1431-1434.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.08.013
[32]  Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective Picture Processing: The Late Positive Potential Is Modulated by Motivational Relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257-261.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720257
[33]  Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The Power of the Like in Adolescence: Effects of Peer Influence on Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Media. Psychological Science, 27, 1027-1035.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673
[34]  Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The Dual Systems Model: Review, Reappraisal, and Reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103-117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010
[35]  Silva, K., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present. Psychological Science, 27, 322-330.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615620379
[36]  Situ, Q.-M., Li, J.-B., & Dou, K. (2016). Reexamining the Linear and U-Shaped Relationships between Self-Control and Emotional and Behavioural Problems. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 177-185.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12118
[37]  Smorti, M., Guarnieri, S., & Ingoglia, S. (2014). The Parental Bond, Resistance to Peer Influence, and Risky Driving in Adolescence. Transportation Research Part F Psychology and Behaviour, 22, 184-195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.001
[38]  Somerville, L. H., Hare, T., & Casey, B. J. (2011). Frontostriatal Maturation Predicts Cognitive Control Failure to Appetitive Cues in Adolescents. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2123-2134.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21572
[39]  Steinberg, L. (2008). A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
[40]  Strang, N. M., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. (2013). The Value of the Dual Systems Model of Adolescent Risk-Taking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00223
[41]  Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
[42]  Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Woestenburg, J. C. (1997). Modulation of Early ERP Components with Peripheral Precues: A Trend Analysis. Biological Psychology, 45, 143-158.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05226-X
[43]  Van Hoorn, J., McCormick, E. M., Rogers, C. R., Ivory, S. L., & Telzer, E. H. (2018). Differential Effects of Parent and Peer Presence on Neural Correlates of Risk Taking in Adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13, 945-955.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy071
[44]  Weigard, A., Chein, J., Albert, D., Smith, A., & Steinberg, L. (2014). Effects of Anonymous Peer Observation on Adolescents’ Preference for Immediate Rewards. Developmental Science, 17, 71-78.
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12099

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133