|
基于长输气管道与斜坡位置关系的管道地质灾害易损性探讨——以中缅天然气输气管道(贵州段)为例
|
Abstract:
地质灾害的发生是导致油气管道事故的原因之一。中缅天然气管道沿线地形错综复杂,地貌类型多样。管道敷设与斜坡的位置关系主要有横向、斜交和同向3种类型,这些特殊位置往往是管道地质灾害的高发区。本文通过对中缅天然气输气管道(贵州段)沿线143处管道地质灾害进行统计,分析了天然气管道(管沟)与斜坡的位置关系对管道地质灾害的控制及管道易损性的影响。本文得出如下结论:1) 管道与斜坡的位置关系不同,管沟对斜坡边界条件的改变存在较大差异性,其中横向管沟对斜坡的改变较为显著,导致斜坡边界的改变较大,常形成高陡边坡,稳定性往往较差,是地质灾害最发育的类型,其次为斜交类管沟,而坡向同向类管沟影响较小;2) 横向管道在灾害发生时最易受损,其次为斜交管道,同向管道易损性最小,管道易损部位为管材或焊接有缺陷处。
The occurrence of geological hazards is one of the causes resulting in oil and gas pipeline acci-dents. The landforms along the route of China-Myanmar natural gas pipeline is complicated and varied. The relationship between pipeline laying and slope position mainly includes three types, which are transverse, oblique and coaxial. These special positions are usually the areas with high incidence of pipeline geological hazards. Based on the statistics of the geological hazards of 143 pipelines along the China-Myanmar natural gas pipeline (Guizhou section), this paper analyzed the effects of the relationship between long gas pipeline (pipe ditch) and slope position on the geological hazards controlling and pipeline vulnerability. In the present article, the conclusions were as follows: 1) There are significant differences in the pipe ditch changing the slope boundary conditions due to different relationship between the pipelines and slopes position. Among them, the transverse pipe ditch changes the slope more significantly, resulting in the alteration of the slope boundary and usually forming a high and steep slope with poor stability, which is the most developed type of geological hazards; the second is the oblique pipe ditch, but the influence of the coaxial pipe ditch is small. 2) Transverse pipeline is the most vulnerable to damage in the event of geological hazards, followed by oblique pipeline, with the least vulnerability in the oblique pipeline, and the most vulnerable part of the pipeline is the defective part of pipe or welding.
[1] | 李越, 刘波. 油气长输管道建设中地质灾害风险管理的研究与应用——以阆中–南充输气管道为例[J]. 灾害学, 2018, 33(1): 152-155+161. |
[2] | 狄彦, 帅健, 王晓霖, 等. 油气管道事故原因分析及分类方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7): 109-115. |
[3] | 么惠全, 冯伟, 张照旭,等. “西气东输”一线管道地质灾害风险监测预警体系[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(1): 81-84. |
[4] | 谢玉华. 论地质灾害对油气管道的危害及风险消减措施[J]. 中国金属通报, 2018, 994(7): 300, 302. |
[5] | 薛辉, 杨学青. 中缅管道途经典型地质灾害影响区域的设计与建设[J]. 油气储运, 2013, 32(12): 1320-1324. |
[6] | 孟凡, 汤棠. 天然气管道地质灾害及其风险控制分析[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(13): 76-77. |
[7] | 房庆磊, 翁扬煌, 贾绪平. 城市燃气管道地质灾害易损性评价[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2017(10): 133-136. |
[8] | 刘晓娟, 袁莉, 刘鑫. 地质灾害对油气管道的危害及风险消减措施[J]. 四川地质学报, 2018, 38(3): 488-492. |
[9] | 罗大游, 温兴平, 张皓楠, 等. 基于GIS的元谋县地质灾害地貌特征研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2019, 30(2): 97-100. |
[10] | 杨继红, 骆诗颖, 杨鑫, 等. 中缅天然气管道(贵州段)沿线地质灾害隐患调查及评价报告[R]. 贵州地质工程勘察设计研究院, 2019. |
[11] | 刘传正. 论地质灾害风险识别问题[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2017, 44(4): 1-7. |
[12] | 吴士强, 钟国华, 张淑绢, 等. 中缅油气管道地质灾害的类型及防治方法[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(4X): 219-221. |
[13] | 沈茂丁, 王峰, 徐文毅, 等. 油气管道地质灾害治理工程设计与审查要点[J]. 油气储运, 2014, 33(10): 1052-1054. |
[14] | 陈大中. 中缅油气管道沿线地质灾害风险消减规划[J]. 化工管理, 2017(34): 108-109. |
[15] | 肖锐铧. 斜坡地质灾害特点与风险管理[J]. 城市与减灾, 2019(3): 75-79. |
[16] | 张启波, 贾颖, 闫晓静. 石油天然气长输管道危险性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(7): 134. |