ICSID中“法庭之友”制度的优势和不足
The Advantages and Concerns of Amicus Curiae in ICSID

近年来，愈来愈多的国际投资争议选择ICSID来解决，国际投资仲裁案件不同于传统的商事仲裁，因为投资仲裁涉及东道国公共利益的保护，所以其对于透明度的要求更高；但是投资仲裁又源于商事仲裁，在保密性和透明度冲突时，就需要寻求二者之间协调和平衡。在众多的投资案件中，“法庭之友”制度开始逐渐适用到仲裁庭的程序中。在分析“法庭之友”的适用中，需要探究其根本来源，并结合投资仲裁中适用“法庭之友”制度的案件，进而了解仲裁庭的态度；在研究“法庭之友”制度发展的同时，探讨该制度存在的优点和不足，并提出相应的完善建议。
In recent years, more and more international investment disputes have been settled by ICSID. International investment arbitration cases, which involve the protection of public interest and policy of the host country, require higher transparency so that it is different from traditional commercial arbitration; but investment arbitration originates from commercial arbitration, when confidentiality and transpar-ency conflict, so it is necessary to seek coordination and balance between both. In many investment cases, the amicus curiae have gradually been applied to the procedures of the arbitral tribunal. In analyzing the application of the amicus curiae, it is necessary to explore the sources, and to integrate the cases of the application of the amicus curiae applied in investment arbitration, so as to understand the attitude of the arbitral tribunal; at the same time, for studying the development of the amicus curiae, it is important to discuss the advantages and concerns of it, and give corresponding suggestions for improvement.