|
荆条胶接接头的力学性能研究
|
Abstract:
为通过胶接加长技术研发荆编家具提供理论依据,选直径相近的荆条试样制成不同接头形式测试其胶合性能。胶接接头的拉伸试验结果表明:搭接接头、交错对接接头、嵌接接头、斜接接头承受的最大拉伸载荷为1.226 KN、1.30 KN、1.422 KN、1.568 KN,破坏应力主要为胶合切应力,因此拉伸胶合强度基本相同。胶接接头的扭转试验结果表明:嵌接、交错对接、斜接三种接头的扭转强度相近,切变模量相近;与无接头试样比较,扭转强度明显降低,但切变模量基本相同。胶接接头的弯曲试验结果表明:方向一(沿试样长度方向的胶接面放置成水平面或与水平方向成倾斜面)加载,破坏应力均为弯曲正应力,斜接、嵌接、交错对接接头的弯曲胶合正应力分别为72.77 MPa、52.97 MPa、38.97 Mpa,弹性模量分别为20.14 GPa、7.99 GPa、5.61 GPa;方向二(沿试样长度方向的胶接面放置成铅直面或与铅直方向成倾斜面)加载,破坏应力均为弯曲切应力,斜接、嵌接、交错对接三种接头的弯曲胶合切应力分别为6.31 MPa、3.56 MPa、1.72 Mpa,弹性模量分别为13.53 GPa、11.26 GPa、8.45 GPa。而无接头试样的抗弯强度是正应力169.41 MPa,弹性模量为14.51 GPa,与斜接接头的弹性模量没有明显差异。综合接头拉伸、扭转、弯曲时的胶合性能得知,斜接接头为首选胶合接头形式。
In order to provide a theoretical basis on Vitex negundo twigs furniture by gluing lengthened tech-niques, the author used similar diameter Vitex negundo twigs to make different joints and tested the gluability of the joints. The results of the tensile tests showed that the maximum tensile loads of lap joint, staggered butt joint, rabbet joint and scarf joint were 1.226 KN, 1.30 KN, 1.422 KN and 1.568 KN in turn, and the breaking stress was glueing shear stress, so the tensile strengths of these four joints were on the whole the same. The results of the torsion tests showed that: the torsional strengths and the shearing modulus of rabbet joints, staggered butt joints and scarf joints were close; the torsional strengths of jointed test specimens decreased obviously than jointless speci-mens, but the shearing modulus was almost the same. The results of bending tests showed that the breaking stresses were bending normal stress loaded in direction one (the cemented surfaces in the length direction of the sample were placed in horizontal plane or inclined to the horizontal direction), the values of the bending normal stress of scarf joint, rabbet joint and staggered butt joint were 72.77 MPa, 52.97 MPa and 38.97 MPa respectively, the modulus of elasticity were 20.14 Gpa, 7.99 Gpa, 5.61GPa in turn; loaded in direction two (the cemented surfaces in the length direc-tion of the sample were placed in vertical plane or inclined to the vertical direction), the breaking stresses were all bending shear stress, the values of the bending shear stress of scarf joint, rabbet joint and staggered butt joint were 6.31 MPa, 3.56 MPa and 1.72 MPa respectively, the modulus of elasticity were 13.53 Gpa, 11.26 Gpa, 8.45 GPa in turn. The bending strength of jointless test specimen was 169.41 MPa normal stress, the modulus of elasticity of jointless specimen was 14.51 GPa. By analyzing the bonding performance of different joints in tensile, torsional and bending tests, we concluded
[1] | 卢伟. 木质胶接接头力学性能的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013. |
[2] | 宋冬利, 李赫亮, 李智超. 接头形式对胶接强度的影响[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 19(4): 426-429. |
[3] | Voyutskii, S.S. (1963) Autohesion and Adhesion of High Polymers. English Edition, John Wiley, New York. |
[4] | Kutscha, D. and Hofer, K. (1969) Feasibility of Joining Advanced Composite Flight Vehicles. AFML-TR-68-391. |
[5] | Wooley, G.R. and Carver, D.R. (1971) Dynamic Performance Characteristics of Mixed and Unmixed Turbofan Engine. Journal of Aircraft, 8, 817-822. |
[6] | 游敏, 郑小玲. 胶接接头剪切和正拉强度试验方法的分析[J]. 粘接, 1994, 15(3): 29-34. |
[7] | GB/T1938-2009. 木材拉伸强度试验方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
[8] | 陆关兴. 胶接接头设计[J]. 粘接, 1986, 7(4): 39-47. |
[9] | 殷勇, 涂善东. 胶接接头力学研究回顾[J]. 化工机械, 2001, 28(4): 241-245. |
[10] | 关世伟. 胶接接头破坏分析[J]. 中国胶粘剂, 2015, 24(2): 57-58. |
[11] | GB239-1999. 金属线材扭转试验方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1999. |
[12] | GB/T1936.1-2009. 木材抗弯强度试验方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
[13] | GB/T1936.2-2009. 木材抗弯弹性模量试验方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
[14] | 孙训芳, 方孝淑, 关来泰. 材料力学(I)第5版[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009. |
[15] | 高璟, 张晓燕, 卢国新, 等. 荆条藤柳力学性质的测试与对比研究[J]. 林业实用技术, 2012(11): 103-106. |
[16] | 高璟, 张晓燕, 卢国新, 等. 高径比跨高比对荆条纵向抗压抗弯性能测试精度的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(4): 214-218. |
[17] | 王玉奇, 何晓聪, 曾凯. 胶接接头力学性能研究进展[J]. 机械强度, 2016, 38(2): 339-347. |