|
Modern Linguistics 2020
批评话语分析视角下文明观的建构与传播——基于习近平在亚洲文明对话大会的主旨演讲
|
Abstract:
近年来,随着中国的崛起,西方国家认为中国影响力的增强是为了与西方文明形成对抗,给中国国际形象带来污名化。在此背景下,中国提出了打造“人类命运共同体”的理念,倡议发起亚洲文明对话大会,向世界阐释中国文明的包容性、平等性、开放性,为实现全球共同发展繁荣贡献中国智慧、中国方案、中国力量。本文以习近平在2019年亚洲文明对话大会的演讲词为例,运用费尔克劳(Fairclaugh)的语篇分析方法对该演讲词进行语篇分析。结果显示,国家领导人在对外演讲中通过在文本中恰当地运用概念隐喻、在文本层面进行互文、话语层面进行互语等策略,来阐释我国的文明观和外交新理念,有助于引起听众的共情,促进世界理解我国的文明观,进而为我国文明观的建构与传播提供了借鉴和指导。
In recent years, with the rise of China, the western countries believe that the enhancement of Chi-na’s influence is to form a confrontation with Western civilization trying to stigmatize China’s in-ternational image. In this context, China put forward the concept of building “a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind”, and initiated the Conference on Dialogue of Asian Civilizations to ex-plain the inclusiveness, equality and openness of China’s civilization to the world, and to contribute China’s wisdom, China’s plan and China’s strength to common development and prosperity of the world. Taking Xi Jinping’s keynote speech at the 2019 Conference on Dialogue of Asian Civilizations as an example, this paper uses Fairclaugh’s discourse analysis approach to analyze the speech. The result shows that, in this speech, the national leader use conceptual metaphor, intertextuality at the text level, and interdiscursivity at the discourse level to explain China’s civilization outlook and new diplomatic concepts, which helps to arouse the audience’s sympathy, promote the world to understand China’s civilization outlook properly, and provide reference for the construction and dissemination of China’s civilization outlook.
[1] | 孙吉胜. 传统文化与十八大以来中国外交话语体系构建[J]. 外交评论(外交学院学报), 2017(4): 2. |
[2] | Fairclough, N. (2001) The Discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Tian, H.L. and Zhao, P., Eds., Critical Discourse Analysis Essential Readings, Nankai University Press, Tianjin, 181-225. |
[3] | 田海龙. 语篇研究: 范畴、视角、方法[M]. 上海: 上海外国语教育出版社, 2009: 140-152. |
[4] | Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London and New York, 10-75. |
[5] | Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge, London and New York, 218. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 |
[6] | Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Cambridge, 84. |
[7] | Lakoff, G. and Johnsen, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by. The University of Chicago Press, London, 150-162. |
[8] | 吴永翠. 关于中美“一带一路”新闻报道的批评隐喻分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东外语外贸大学, 2018: 54. |
[9] | 朱晓琴. 拟人隐喻的英汉对比研究 [J]. 当代教育理论与实践, 2011(1): 131. |