|
- 2018
The Madisonian Republic and Modern Nationalist Populism: Democracy and the Rule of LawKeywords: Populism,Political Theory,U.S. Constitution,Liberalism,Liberty,Constitutional Ideals,Democracy,United States,Madison,Founding Fathers,Framers,Federal Republic,populismo,teoría política,Constitución de EE. UU.,nacionalismo,populismo,liberalismo,libertad,ideales constitucionales,democracia,Madison,padres fundadores,dise?adores,república federal,民粹主义,政治理论,美国宪法,自由主义,自由,宪政理想,民主,麦迪逊,开国元勋,制宪者,联邦共和国 Abstract: The U.S. Federal Constitution was built to be a machine for displacing conflict. Madison and the other Framers erected a Federal Republic organized to control populist movements and preserve the interests of the greatest stakeholders, while offering the “most liberty imaginable” in 1788. In 2016, a populist movement ascended to the commanding heights of power. How did it happen and what are the consequences when a faction comes to power? Is it a defect of the modern structure of American government? Has the U.S. Constitution reached a place where it is no longer functional? Or can Madison’s Republic continue to work against popular factions rising in a common passion fired by fear and hatred? In tackling these questions, this article suggests that the U.S. Constitutional Framers did not know in 1788 what exiting the aristocratic and feudal world would mean and what kind of state and society the Republic would become. I argue Madison’s contributions to The Federalist are exemplars of the engineer showing how each part of the machine fits together to achieve a comprehensive and effective whole. The national populism of the kind circulating around the Western world in 2016 has posed real challenges to that machinery
|