全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

Benefits

DOI: 10.1177/1473095217723382

Keywords: community benefits,community development,economic development,ethics,justice,nonideal theory,project labor agreement,rhetorical trickery,tokenism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Community members seek benefits-sharing planning agreements to advance their own distributive justice goals by directing benefits to communities. Nonideal theory does much to explain the context and possibilities for these agreements. The agreements forged between communities and development interests seek to address, but not completely achieve, distributive justice via consensus about incremental changes in project benefit distribution. However, implementation and outcomes can vary widely. This article develops theory to conceptualize a practical framework for these planning agreements using nonideal justice theories, granted the triple concerns of inaction, tokenism, and rhetorical trickery posed by ineffective implementation. The Crenshaw Light Rail Project in Los Angeles illustrates the issues in play

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133