全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and meta

DOI: 10.1177/2050640618780762

Keywords: Clostridium difficile,systematic review,meta-analysis,faecal microbiota transplantation,faecal transplant

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Protocols for treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) through faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) are still not standardised. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of different FMT protocols for rCDI according to routes, number of infusions and infused material. MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched through 31 May 2017. Studies offering multiple infusions if a single infusion failed to cure rCDI were included. Data were combined through a random effects meta-analysis. Fifteen studies (1150 subjects) were analysed. Multiple infusions increased efficacy rates overall (76% versus 93%) and in each route of delivery (duodenal delivery: 73% with single infusion versus 81% with multiple infusions; capsule: 80% versus 92%; colonoscopy: 78% versus 98% and enema: 56% versus 92%). Duodenal delivery and colonoscopy were associated, respectively, with lower efficacy rates (p?=?0.039) and higher efficacy rates (p?=?0.006) overall. Faecal amount?≤?50?g (p?=?0.006) and enema (p?=?0.019) were associated with lower efficacy rates after a single infusion. The use of fresh or frozen faeces did not influence outcomes. Routes, number of infusions and faecal dosage may influence efficacy rates of FMT for rCDI. These findings could help to optimise FMT protocols in clinical practice

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133