全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2019 

Long

DOI: 10.1177/1049731517748424

Keywords: randomized controlled trial,job search intervention,research-based,research-supported,active labor market policy,exiting labor market

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study reevaluates the effects of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of job search interventions on labor force participation. In the trial, various methods of job search interventions were included, of which about half were research-based JOBS (Job Opportunity and Basic Skills) interventions and the other half were practice-based, that is, without a theoretical or empirical base. This study compares effects of the research-based and practice-based interventions. The trial included data from 1998 to 2000 of 1,013 unemployed people in Finland with 3-year follow-up data from official labor market records. Multilevel multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the intervention effects on labor market outcomes. The results demonstrated that beneficial long-term effects were produced only in interventions based on the research-based JOBS method for participants at risk of baseline depression. In contrast, the practice-based interventions seemed to have adverse effects on employment. These findings indicate the importance of research-based interventions within active labor market policies

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133