全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Effect of Microstructure on Stress-Strain Behaviour and Susceptibility to Cracking of Pipeline Steels

DOI: 10.1155/2012/638290

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The effect of microstructure on the stress-strain behaviour of pipeline steels was studied. Slow strain rate ( 2 × 1 0 ? 6 ?s?1) tests were conducted on grade X65 and X100 steels in silicone oil and hydrogen carbonate/carbonate solution. The as-received grade X100 steel at 7 5 ° C showed serrated stress-strain curves. The magnitude of the serrations depended upon the strain rate and test temperature. Annealing at 6 0 0 ° C or above removes the serrations, but this increased the susceptibility to transgranular cracking in hydrogen carbonate/carbonate solution at potentials below ?800?mV (sce). The removal and reformation of banding in pipeline steels were also studied. Ferrite/pearlite becomes aligned during the hot rolling stage of pipe manufacture and causes directionality in crack propagation and mechanical properties. Heat treatments were carried out which show that banding in grade X65 and X100 can be removed above 9 0 0 ° C. This depends on homogenisation of carbon which also depends on temperature, time, and cooling rate. 1. Introduction The strength and toughness requirements of pipeline steels may be achieved by appropriate steel production techniques. Different strengthening methods are used by manufacturers to satisfy codes. Mechanical performance and susceptibility to environment-assisted cracking depend on microstructure, and so heat-treated pipeline steels with uniform fine-grained microstructure such as bainite are generally more resistant to stress corrosion cracking, SCC, than those consisting of pearlite and ferrite [1]. Some cracks that are hydrogen-induced have been shown to be associated with the boundary between ferrite and pearlite [2]. Such work suggests that homogenisation of composition and phases in steels improve their resistance to cracking. Pearlite-ferrite bands in carbon steels are associated with the segregation of substitutional alloying elements which raise or lower the temperature (Ar3) for the formation of proeutectoid ferrite upon cooling [3]. The segregation occurs during solidification of steel and gives rise to longitudinal bands during hot rolling [3–5]. If the Ar3??is raised by the solute, then proeutectoid ferrite nucleates first in the solute-rich regions. On the other hand, if the Ar3 temperature is lowered by the solute, then the nucleation of the proeutectoid ferrite begins in the solute lean regions. In either case, carbon atoms, which diffuse rapidly, are rejected from the proeutectoid ferrite, thus producing carbon-rich regions of austenite, which transform finally to pearlite [3, 4]. In pipeline steels,

References

[1]  R. N. Parkins, A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking of High Pressure Gas Pipelines, NACE Corrosion, Houston, Tex, USA, 2000.
[2]  D. Hardie, E. A. Charles, and A. H. Lopez, “Hydrogen embrittlement of high strength pipeline steels,” Corrosion Science, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 4378–4385, 2006.
[3]  J. S. Kirkaldy, J. von Destinon-Forstmann, and R. J. Brigham, “Simulation of banding in steels,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, vol. 1, pp. 59–81, 1962.
[4]  S. W. Thompson and P. R. Howell, “Factors influencing ferrite/pearlite banding and origin of large pearlite nodules in a hypoeutectoid plate steel,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 777–784, 1992.
[5]  G. Krauss, “Solidification, segregation, and banding in carbon and alloy steels,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 781–792, 2003.
[6]  F. A. Khalid, M. Farooque, A. Ul Haq, and A. Q. Khan, “Role of ferrite/pearlite banded structure and segregation on mechanical properties of microalloyed hot rolled steel,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1209–1215, 1999.
[7]  E. A. Charles and R. N. Parkins, “Generation of stress corrosion cracking environments at pipeline surfaces,” Corrosion, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 518–527, 1995.
[8]  R. N. Parkins and R. R. Fessler, “Stress corrosion cracking of high-pressure gas transmission pipelines,” International Journal of Materials in Engineering Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 80–96, 1978.
[9]  J. Q. Wang and A. Atrens, “SCC initiation for X65 pipeline steel in the “high” pH carbonate/bicarbonate solution,” Corrosion Science, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2199–2217, 2003.
[10]  B. J. Brindley and P. J. Worthington, “Yield-point phenomena in substitutional alloys,” Metallurgical Review, vol. 15, no. 145, pp. 101–114, 1970.
[11]  S. Xu, X. Q. Wu, E. H. Han, and W. Ke, “Effects of strain rate and temperature on tensile properties of a SA508 Cl.3 steel for reactor pressure vessel,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2882–2889, 2009.
[12]  B. H. Tian, H. X. Li, Y. G. Zhang, and C. Q. Chen, “Types of serrations in Al-Li single crystals,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 611–612, 1997.
[13]  A. Cottrell, An Introduction to Metallurgy, chapter 21, Edward Arnold, 1980.
[14]  W. C. Leslie, The Physical Metallurgy of Steels, chapter 2, McGraw-Hill, 1982.
[15]  A. H. Cottrell, “The strength of metals,” Journal of Chemical, Metallurgical, and Mining Society of South Africa, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 177–181, 1953.
[16]  R. J. Baird, “The effects of strain-ageing due to interstitial solutes on the mechanical properties of metals,” Metallurgical Review, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 1–18, 1971.
[17]  J. D. Atkinson and J. Yu, “The role of dynamic strain-ageing in the environment assisted cracking observed in pressure vessel steels,” Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1997.
[18]  I. S. Kim and S. S. Kang, “Dynamic strain aging in SA508-class 3 pressure vessel steel,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 123–129, 1995.
[19]  G. Li, G. Zhang, J. Zhou, C. Huang, and W. Yang, “Characteristics and mechanism of high pH stress corrosion cracking of pipeline steel X70,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 353–358, no. 1, pp. 219–222, 2007.
[20]  G. R. Wilms, “Note on the hardness changes in tempering mild steel,” Journal of the Australian Institute of Metals, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 168–169, 1975.
[21]  R. Grossterlinden, R. Kawalla, U. Lotter, and H. Pircher, “Formation of pearlitic banded structures in ferritic-pearlitic steels,” Steel Research, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 331–336, 1992.
[22]  J. D. Lavender and F. W. Jones, “An investigation on banding,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 1949.
[23]  R. A. Grange, “Effect of microstructural banding in steel,” Metallurgical Transactions A, pp. 417–126, 1971.
[24]  W. A. Spitzig, “Effect of sulfides and sulfide morphology on anisotropy of tensile ductility and toughness of Hh hot-rolled C-Mn steels,” Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 471–484, 1983.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133