Outcomes Following Posterior and Posterolateral Plating of Distal Fibula Fractures

Ankle fractures are common orthopaedic injuries often requiring open reduction and internal fixation. A variety of positions for plate placement exist for surgical fixation of distal fibula fractures, including direct lateral, posterior, or posterolateral. Direct lateral is more common, despite evidence that posterior and posterolateral placement is mechanically superior. However, concern for peroneal tendon injury from posterior plating remains. Our study investigates clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent operative fixation of distal fibula fractures with posterior or posterolateral plating over a 3-year period. Analyses were performed on 59 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up. Questionnaires were used to obtain demographic data, in addition to information regarding the presence of ankle pain, subsequent hardware removal, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS). In patients with at least 2 years of follow-up (average 39.6 ± 10.6 months), 37.2% reported ongoing ankle pain; 11 patients underwent hardware removal (18.6%), with 8 patients undergoing removal because of hardware-related pain (13.6%). FAOS scores (n = 51) were as follows: pain (79.9 ± 22.3), activities of daily living (84.2 ± 22.6), symptoms (75.7 ± 23.5), sports (69.4 ± 31.6), and quality of life (58.3 ± 30.5). Posterior and posterolateral plating achieved good clinical and high functional outcomes across our study population. The percentage of hardware removal in our study was either equivalent to, or less than, historical controls for any type of fibular fixation, and removal may be helpful for those patients whose postoperative ankle pain is subjectively related to the hardware. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV: Retrospectiv