全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2019 

Interobserver variability (between radiation oncologist and radiation therapist) in tumor bed contouring after breast

DOI: 10.1177/0300891619839288

Keywords: Breast cancer,tumor bed delineation,interobserver variability,surgical clips

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

To examine interobserver variability between the radiation oncologist (RTO) and the radiation therapist (RTT) in delineating the tumor bed (TB) in early breast cancer (BC). We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a radiotherapy boost to the TB. In a first group, the clinical target volume (CTV) for the boost was the surgical bed, defined by using surgical clips. In a second group, the CTV was defined by identifying a seroma cavity or a metallic find on the scar. These contours were compared in terms of volume, number of slices, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Forty patients were assessed: 20 had surgical clips (group 1) while the other 20 had none (group 2). There was no difference in the number of slices contoured by the 2 operators for group 1, but a statistically significant difference emerged in the volumes: the RTT identified a TB that was a mean 45% smaller than the one identified by the RTO. Random differences were found between the 2 operators for group 2. The TBs delineated for this group were significantly larger (P<0.05) than those identified by the RTT for group 1. The mean Dice value between the RTO’s and the RTT’s TBs was 0.69±0.07 (range 0.53–0.81) for group 1 and 0.37±0.18 (range 0–0.58) for group 2 (P<0.05). This study showed that the use of clips coincided with less interoperator variability. With appropriate training, the RTT may play an important part in the multidisciplinary radiotherapy team

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133