Lateral osteotomy plus hump resection vs hump re-modeling without lateral osteotomy: impact on frontal nasal view

This article reviews the personal experience and evolution of osteotomy approach in the last years of practice to obtain a natural appearance of the nasal pyramid in the frontal view. The aim is to analyse the long-term results after rhinoplasty on nasal width in two different cohorts of patients subjected to lateral osteotomy plus hump resection vs. hump re-modeling without lateral osteotomy considering the impact on frontal nasal view and how this relates to changes observed over time in the nasal width and contour. The study was carried out between January 2010 and December 2013, considering 42 patients undergoing primary rhinoplasty. Comparisons were made between the change in the dorsal width of the nasal pyramid at the level of the medial canthi, at the level of the inferior margin of the orbital rim, of ventral width of the nasal pyramid at the level of the medial canthi and at the level of the inferior margin of the orbital rim. In the first group, we found significant postoperative mean widening of the intercanthal dorsal width and narrowing of the ventral, while in the second group there was significant postoperative mean narrowing of the dorsal width both at level of the medial canthi and the anterior junction of the nasal bones. Our analysis seems to point out that dorsal grafting is useful for re-shaping the nasal profile with a persistent and harmonious correction of the dorsal frontal dimension of the nose. Simple hump removal/repositioning may be considered in selected instances to avoid lateral osteotomies. It also seems of paramount importance to tailor osteotomies according to nasal bone anatomy: large, strong and curved bones deserve aggressive narrowing by lateral and medial continuous osteotomies without periosteal elevation, although this approach may be insufficient to narrow the upper dorsal aspect of the nose