全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Recognition of Relevant ORP, pH, and DO Bending Points in Ammonia Removal from Drinking Water through Online BAF System

DOI: 10.1155/2010/587032

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study was undertaken to identify the relevant bending points in ORP, pH, and DO profiles in ammonia removal through online monitoring. A novelty BAF system as newl application for drinking water treatment that equipped with ORP, pH, DO and sensors was used. Two types of polluted drinking water strength (low and high strength) with various concentrations and aeration flow were treated at a fixed-time reaction of 24 h. Experiments were conducted at four track studies (TS) of TS1 ( 50?mg/L, aeration 0.3 L/min), TS2 ( = 100?mg/L, aeration 2.0 L/min), TS3 ( 100?mg/L, no aeration) and TS4 ( 10?mg/L, aeration 0.1 L/min). The results showed that the removal of was more than 95% for TS1, TS2, and TS4. From the online monitoring performances, DO elbow and ammonia valley appeared in ORP and pH profiles, respectively. Similarly, new positive plateaus were observed in DO, indicating that the nitrifiers stopped to consume the DO after was completely removed. Hence, based on the bending points, the aeration system is possible to be automatically stopped just after DO elbow and ammonia valley appears in order to save the energy consumption and to shorten the time demands for the drinking water treatment process. 1. Introduction The presence of ammonia in drinking water exceeding the Malaysian regulated limit (<1.5?mg/L) became a major problem to drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). Recently, there is no specific treatment system that can remove the pollutant efficiently which finally causes plant shutdown for a period of time. Consequently, the populations in the area will face a shortage in water supply and interruption in almost daily activities. Moreover, high ammonia level in drinking water provided a complication on chlorination process due to the yield of chloramines [1], human nervous system damage and created a deteriorating taste and odour of water [2]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an effective additional water treatment system, typically for ammonia removal in order to prevent the plant shutdown due to the high level of ammonia in water. Based on the literature, biological aerated filter (BAF) is a suitable process as an additional system in DWTPs where the system is well known as one of the biological treatment systems in wastewater treatment but not in drinking water treatment. The BAF system is an attached growth process where consortium microorganisms grow on media which are stationary during normal operation with aeration [3, 4]. Among the outstanding advantages of BAF are that it is a flexible reactor and able to perform solids

References

[1]  E. Okoniewska, J. Lach, M. Kacprzak, and E. Neczaj, “The removal of manganese, iron and ammonium nitrogen on impregnated activated carbon,” Desalination, vol. 206, no. 1–3, pp. 251–258, 2007.
[2]  W. R. Markesbery, W. D. Ehmann, M. Alauddin, and T. I. M. Hossain, “Brain trace element concentrations in aging,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1984.
[3]  W. S. Chang, S. W. Hong, and J. Park, “Effect of zeolite media for the treatment of textile wastewater in a biological aerated filter,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 693–698, 2002.
[4]  F. Liu, C. C. Zhao, D. F. Zhao, and G. H. Liu, “Tertiary treatment of textile wastewater with combined media biological aerated filter (CMBAF) at different hydraulic loadings and dissolved oxygen concentrations,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 161–167, 2008.
[5]  D. Su, J. Wang, K. Liu, and D. Zhou, “Kinetic performance of oil-field produced water treatment by biological aerated filter,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 591–594, 2007.
[6]  A. T. Mann and T. Stephenson, “Modelling biological aerated filters for wastewater treatment,” Water Research, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2443–2448, 1997.
[7]  S. H. Joo, D. J. Kim, I. K. Yoo, K. Park, and G. C. Cha, “Partial nitrification in an upflow biological aerated filter by limitation,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 937–940, 2000.
[8]  T. Stephenson, S. J. T. Pollard, and E. Cartmell, “Feasibility of biological aerated filters (BAFs) for leachate treatment,” in Proceedings Sardina, 9th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, Italy, 2003.
[9]  J. H. Ha and S. K. Ong, “Nitrification and denitrification in partially aerated biological aerated filter (BAF) with dual size sand media,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 9–17, 2007.
[10]  S. B. He, G. Xue, and H. N. Kong, “The performance of BAF using natural zeolite as filter media under conditions of low temperature and ammonium shock load,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 143, no. 1-2, pp. 291–295, 2007.
[11]  Z. Han, W. Wu, J. Zhu, and Y. Chen, “Oxidization-reduction potential and pH for optimization of nitrogen removal in a twice-fed sequencing batch reactor treating pig slurry,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2008.
[12]  B. S. Akin and A. Ugurlu, “Monitoring and control of biological nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2873–2878, 2005.
[13]  D. Gao, Y. Peng, B. Li, and H. Liang, “Shortcut nitrification-denitrification by real-time control strategies,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 2298–2300, 2009.
[14]  Y. Cui, S. Wang, and J. Li, “On-line monitoring for phosphorus removal process and bacterial community in sequencing batch reactor,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 484–492, 2009.
[15]  C. H. Ga and C. S. Ra, “Real-time control of oxic phase using pH (mV)-time profile in swine wastewater treatment,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2009.
[16]  G. Andreottola, P. Foladori, and M. Ragazzi, “On-line control of a SBR system for nitrogen removal from industrial wastewater,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 93–100, 2001.
[17]  A. Spagni, J. Buday, P. Ratini, and G. Bortone, “Experimental considerations on monitoring ORP, pH, conductivity and dissolved oxygen in nitrogen and phosphorus biological removal processes,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 197–204, 2001.
[18]  B. Li and P. L. Bishop, “Oxidation-reduction potential changes in aeration tanks and microprofiles of activated sludge floc in medium- and low-strength wastewaters,” Water Environment Research, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 394–403, 2004.
[19]  N. Kishida, JU. H. Kim, M. Chen, H. Sasaki, and R. Sudo, “Effectiveness Of oxidation-reduction potential and pH as monitoring and control parameters for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment by sequencing batch reactors,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 285–290, 2003.
[20]  I. A. Al-Ghusain, J. Huang, O. J. Hao, and B. S. Lim, “Using pH as a real-time control parameter for wastewater treatment and sludge digestion processes,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 159–168, 1994.
[21]  I. Al-Ghusain and O. J. Hao, “Use of pH as control parameter for aerobic/anoxic sludge digestion,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 225–235, 1995.
[22]  J. Ye, H. Yin, B. Mai et al., “Biosorption of chromium from aqueous solution and electroplating wastewater using mixture of Candida lipolytica and dewatered sewage sludge,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 3893–3902, 2010.
[23]  Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2004.
[24]  H. A. Hasan, S. R. S. Abdullah, S. K. Kamarudin, and N. T. Kofli, “A review on the design criteria of biological aerated filter for cod, ammonia and manganese removal in drinking water treatment,” Journal of Institution Engineers Malaysia, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 25–33, 2009.
[25]  R. F. Yu, S. L. Liaw, C. N. Chang, H. J. Lu, and W. Y. Cheng, “Monitoring and control using on-line ORP on the continuous-flow activated sludge batch reactor system,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 1997.
[26]  J. H. Kim, M. Chen, N. Kishida, and R. Sudo, “Integrated real-time control strategy for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment using sequencing batch reactors,” Water Research, vol. 38, no. 14-15, pp. 3340–3348, 2004.
[27]  K. Pochana and J. Keller, “Study of factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND),” Water Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 61–68, 1999.
[28]  W. Y. Dong, H. J. Wang, W. G. Li, W. C. Ying, G. H. Gan, and Y. Yang, “Effect of DO on simultaneous removal of carbon and nitrogen by a membrane aeration/filtration combined bioreactor,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 344, no. 1-2, pp. 219–224, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133