全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Dawn of Rational Intersubjectivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2020.103020, PP. 300-315

Keywords: Social Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Hegel, German Idealism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article aims to explore the Hegelian views on humanity’s emancipation from the natural condition and the gradual process of social rationalization. In the context of an immanent determinative movement from abstract to concrete, the dialectical process passes through the concepts of natural spirit, consciousness and self-consciousness, until the concept of rational spirit becomes its terminal station. Given that Hegel himself locates the prelude to the right-oriented or just relation already in the rational mutual recognition of the particular self-consciousnesses, i.e. at the terminal point of a dialectical deduction that starts from the concept of natural spirit and moves through the concepts of consciousness and self-consciousness, this article tries to reconstruct in broad lines the key points of this process. According to Hegel, the total transit through all these three evolutionary stages is crowned by the ability of spirit to come to terms with the objective completion of its concept, that is to think of itself not only as a subjective structure, opposite to an external object, but as homogenous to objectivity, in the meaning of the thing itself (die Sache selbst). The moment of rational intersubjectivity is of cardinal importance for this completion, which grants spirit the ability for intelligent theorizing and just practical conduct.

References

[1]  Bowman, B. (2013). Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139520201
[2]  Burbidge, J. (1981). On Hegel’s Logic (pp. 61-83). Atlantic Highlands, US: Humanities Press.
[3]  Burbidge, J. W. (2007). Hegel’s Systematic Contigency (pp. 91-92). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590366
[4]  Fichte, J. G. (2000). Foundations of Natural Right (pp. 29-79). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[5]  Hegel, G. W. F. (2007). Philosophy of Mind (pp. 3-215). New York: Oxford University Press.
[6]  Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The Science of Logic (pp. 530-546). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7]  Houlgate, S. (2006). The Opening of Hegel’s Logic (pp. 32-54). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.
[8]  Peperzak, A. (2001). Modern Freedom: Hegel’s Legal, Moral and Political Philosophy (p. 141). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0856-3
[9]  Rockmore, T. (1986). Hegel’s Circular Epistemology (pp. 1-110). US: Indiana University Press.
[10]  Sparby, T. (2015). Hegel’s Conception of the Determinate Negation (pp. 314-340). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004284616
[11]  Winfield, R. D. (2011). The Living Mind. Plymouth, UK: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[12]  Winfield, R. D. (2012). Hegel’s Science of Logic (pp. 345-357). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133