The article expounds the problems existing in the field of coordinated environmental supervision of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area, analyzes the legal problems existing in the field of environmental supervision and the reasons for the imbalance of the innovative governance structure from the perspective of the inadequate adaptability reform of the environmental supervision system and the insufficient innovation power of the environmental governance theory. This paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to further improve the supporting mechanism of environmental supervision in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area under the environmental protection law, and to strengthen the construction of environmental supervision and security system in this area in combination with supervision socialization and the revision of the administrative supervision law. In order to complete the research task well, this paper selects the research methods of system analysis and literature analysis.
References
[1]
Adeniji, K. (1975). The Legal Challenge of Environmental Pollution to Africa: A Case Study in the Regional Approach to Environmental Problems. Anglo-American Law Review, 3, 312. https://doi.org/10.1177/147377957500400306
[2]
Agostini, A.M., & Ferreira, H. S. (2015). Citizen Supervision: From the Construction of the Concept of Citizenship to the Effectiveness of Its Exercise by Means of the Supervision of Environmental Infractions. Veredas do Direito, 23, 91.
[3]
Holovkin, O. (2011). The State Control and Supervision in the Sphere of Environmental Protection as a Component of Environmental Policy of Ukraine, Agricultural, Land and Environmental Law. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 4, 290.
[4]
Klijn, A.-M., Gupta, J., & Nijboer, A. (2009). Privatizing Environmental Resources: The Need for Supervision of Clean Development Mechanism Contracts. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 18, 172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2009.00639.x
[5]
Matthes, R. A. (2011). Extra Supervision as a Tool for Environmental Protection in Brazil. Veredas do Direito, 16, 47.
[6]
Olson, E. D. (1984). The Quiet Shift of Power: Office of Management and Budget Supervision of Environmental Protection Agency Rulemaking under Executive Order 12,291. Virginia Journal of Natural Resources Law, 1, 2.
[7]
Richard, L. (1985). Challenges to Presidential Supervision of Environmental Rulemaking. Hofstra Environmental Law Digest, 2, 22.
[8]
Yevstigneyev, A. (2014). Legal Problems of State Supervision for the Provision of Ecological Safety during Special Subsoil Use in Ukraine, Agricultural, Land and Environmental Law. Review of Kyiv University of Law, 2, 253
