全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

碳排放权交易制度对企业全要素生产率的影响——基于上市公司的三重差分实证研究
The Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading System on Enterprise Total Factor Productivity—A Triple Differential Empirical Study Based on Listed Companies

DOI: 10.12677/JLCE.2020.92008, PP. 70-81

Keywords: 碳交易试点政策,全要素生产率,三重差分模型,资本配置效率
Pilot Carbon Trading Policy
, Total Factor Productivity, Triple Differential Model, Capital Allocation Efficiency

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文以中国2011年底出台的碳交易试点政策为准自然实验,基于中国A股上市公司2008~2015年的数据,通过构建三重差分模型考察碳交易试点政策对企业全要素生产率的影响。本文实证结果表明:与对照组相比,碳交易试点政策导致处理组企业的全要素生产率显著降低;而且在2012年至2015年这个期间,碳交易试点政策对处理组企业的全要素生产率的降低作用逐渐增强。进一步进行作用机制检验,发现碳交易试点政策通过降低企业资本配置效率水平来对企业全要素生产率施加影响。基于企业股权性质视角的分组检验显示,与非国有企业相比,国有企业对碳交易试点政策更敏感,实施碳交易试点政策会显著降低国有企业的全要素生产率。本文的发现对中国进一步推动全国统一的碳排放权交易市场和企业提高全要素生产率有着重要的指导意义。
Taking the carbon trading pilot policy issued by China at the end of 2011 as a quasi-natural expe-riment, and based on the data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2015, this paper constructs a triple difference model to investigate the impact of carbon trading pilot policy on total factor productivity. The empirical results show that: compared with the control group, the policy resulted in a significant reduction in the total factor productivity of the processing group en-terprises. In addition, this reduction effect gradually increased in the period from 2012 to 2015. A further mechanism test shows that this policy exerts its influence on enterprises by reducing the efficiency level of capital allocation. The group test based on the perspective of the nature of cor-porate equity shows that the total factor productivity of state-owned enterprises is more sensitive to this policy than non-state-owned enterprises, and implementing of this policy will significantly reduce the total factor productivity of state-owned enterprises. The findings of this paper have important guiding significance for China to further promote a unified national carbon trading market and the rise of corporate total factor productivity.

References

[1]  王勇, 赵晗. 中国碳交易市场启动对地区碳排放效率的影响[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2019, 29(1): 50-58.
[2]  刘晔, 张训常. 碳排放交易制度与企业研发创新——基于三重差分模型的实证研究[J]. 经济科学, 2017(3): 102-114.
[3]  Zhang, Y.-J., Shi, W. and Jiang, L. (2020) Does China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policy Improve the Technology Innovation of Relevant Enterprises? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 872-885.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2404
[4]  Wen, F.H., Wu, N. and Gong, X. (2020) China’s Carbon Emissions Trading and Stock Returns. Energy Economics, 86, Article ID: 104657.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104627
[5]  沈洪涛, 黄楠. 碳排放权交易机制能提高企业价值吗[J]. 财贸经济, 2019, 40(1): 144-161.
[6]  Barbera Anthony, J. and McConnell Virginia, D. (1990) The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industry Productivity: Direct and Indirect Effects. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 50-65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90051-Y
[7]  Telle, K. and Larsson, J. (2007) Do Environmental Regulations Hamper Productivity Growth? How Accounting for Improvements of Plants Environmental Performance Can Change the Conclusion. Ecological Economics, 61, 438-445.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.015
[8]  李树, 陈刚. 环境管制与生产率增长——以APPCL2000的修订为例[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(1): 17-31.
[9]  朱承亮. 环境规制下中国火电行业全要素生产率及其影响因素[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2016, 32(6): 60-70.
[10]  李强. 环境分权与企业全要素生产率——基于我国制造业微观数据的分析[J]. 财经研究, 2017, 43(3): 133-145.
[11]  范丹, 王维国, 梁佩凤. 中国碳排放交易权机制的政策效果分析——基于双重差分模型的估计[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(6): 2383-2392.
[12]  钱雪松, 康瑾, 唐英伦, 曹夏平. 产业政策、资本配置效率与企业全要素生产率——基于中国2009年十大产业振兴规划自然实验的经验研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(8): 42-59.
[13]  孙玉阳, 宋有涛, 杨春荻. 环境规制对经济增长质量的影响: 促进还是抑制?——基于全要素生产率视角[J]. 当代经济管理, 2019, 41(10): 11-17.
[14]  任胜钢, 郑晶晶, 刘东华, 陈晓红. 排污权交易机制是否提高了企业全要素生产率——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(5): 5-23.
[15]  Tang, H.-L., Liu, J.-M. and Wu, J.-G. (2020) The Impact of Command- and-Control Environmental Regulation on Enterprise Total Factor Productivity: A Qua-si-Natural Experiment Based on China’s “Two Control Zone” Policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, Article ID: 120011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120011
[16]  Marcel Oestreich, A. and Tsiakas, I. (2015) Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Journal of Banking and Finance, 58, 294-308.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.05.005
[17]  Brouwers, R., Schoubben, F. and Van Hulle, C. (2018) The Influ-ence of Carbon Cost Pass through on the Link between Carbon Emission and Corporate Financial Performance in the Context of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1422-1436.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2193
[18]  宋晓玲, 孔垂铭. 中国碳交易市场对地区经济结构影响的实证分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2018(9): 98-108.
[19]  黄向岚, 张训常, 刘晔. 我国碳交易政策实现环境红利了吗?[J]. 经济评论, 2018(6): 86-99.
[20]  Lyu, X.H., Shi, A. and Wang, X. (2020) Research on the Impact of Carbon Emission Trading System on Low-Carbon Technology Innovation. Carbon Management, 11, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1721977
[21]  Zhang, W., Li, J., Li, G.X. and Guo, S.C. (2020) Emission Re-duction Effect and Carbon Market Efficiency of Carbon Emissions Trading Policy in China. Energy, 196, Article ID: 117117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117117
[22]  Olley, G.S. and Pakes, A. (1996) The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263-1297.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831
[23]  Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. (2003) Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317-341.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246
[24]  鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计: 1999-2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(2): 541-558.
[25]  黄贤环, 王瑶. 国有企业限薪抑制了全要素生产率的提升吗[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2020, 22(1): 34-50.
[26]  付明卫, 叶静怡, 孟俣希, 雷震. 国产化率保护对自主创新的影响——来自中国风电制造业的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(2): 118-131.
[27]  方军雄. 所有制、市场化进程与资本配置效率[J]. 管理世界, 2007(11): 27-35.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133