多词素词识别中词素分解与TL效应
Morphological Decomposition and TL Effect

DOI: 10.12677/ML.2020.82027, PP. 192-198

Keywords: 多词素词，词素分解，TL效应，双语者
Morphological Complex Words, Morphological Decomposition, Tl Effect, Bilinguals

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

多词素词识别的早期阶段有基于形的而且是语义无关的词素分解过程，而字母顺序颠倒致词识别模糊效应(TL效应)也发生在词的早期形态信息加工阶段。通过在词素内部和词素边界两个不同位置上颠倒字母顺序并结合使用真假词缀等来考察TL效应，可以巧妙地探究多词素词识别加工中的词素分解过程。这种词素分解机制在中文字词识别中，似乎更应该有字词构成成分的自动化分解加工过程，而汉字与英文词的诸多认知差异来自于两种语言的构形特点，本文梳理了英文词中有关多词素词识别的早期加工研究和TL效应的应用，结合汉字的加工特点，提出通过考察大学生英文多词素词识别中的TL效应和检验这种机制迁移的可能性及需注意的问题。
The early morphological decomposition is purely based on its orthography instead of semantic information. Transposed-letter confusability effect which reflects how letter position is encoded is also believed to appear at the very early stage of visual word recognition. This unique effect has led researchers to tap directly into the morphological processing of morphological complex words by observing respectively the interaction between TL effect and morpheme boundary and that between TL effect and pseudo-derived words. The literature concerning morphological decompo-sition process from the perspective of TL effect in the alphabetic languages can shed light on the process of morphological complex words in second language learners, especially those who are less proficient bilinguals.

References

[1]	Diependaele, K., Du？abeitia, J.A., Morris, J. and Keuleers, E. (2011) Fast Morphological Effects in First and Second Language Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
[2]	Du？abeitia, J.A., Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2007) Do Trans-posed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Morpheme Level? Evidence for Morpho-Orthographic Decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
[3]	Longtin, C.M. and Meunier, F. (2005) Morphological De-composition in Early Visual Word Processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
[4]	Rastle, K., Davis, M.H. and New, B. (2004) The Broth in My Brother’s Brothel: Morpho-Orthographic Segmentation in Visual Word Recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090-1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
[5]	Taft, M. (2003) Morphological Representation as a Correlation between Form and Meaning. In: Reading Complex Words, Neuropschology and Cognition, Volume 22, Springer US, Berlin, 113-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_6
[6]	Meunier, F. and Longtin, C.M. (2007) Morphological De-composition and Semantic Integration in Word Processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.005
[7]	Giraudo, H. and Grainger, J. (2000) Effects of Prime Word Fre-quency and Cumulative Root Frequency in Masked Morphological Priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119652
[8]	McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981) An In-teractive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part I. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychologi-cal Review, 88, 375-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
[9]	Christianson, K., Johnson, R.L. and Rayner, K. (2005) Letter Transpositions within and across Morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
[10]	Acha, J. and Perea, M. (2008) The Effect of Neighborhood Frequency in Reading: Evidence with Transposed-Letter Neighbors. Cognition, 108, 290-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.006
[11]	Andrews, S. (1996) Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0040
[12]	Perea, M., Rosa, E. and Gómez, C. (2005) The Frequency Effect for Pseudowords in the Lexical Decision Task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301-314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206493
[13]	Perea, M. and Lupker, S.J. (2003) Transposed-Letter Confusability Ef-fects in Masked form Priming. In: Masked Priming: State of the Art, Psychology Press, Hove, 97-120.
[14]	Perea, M. and Lupker, S.J. (2004) Can CANISO Activate CASINO? Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects with Nonadjacent Let-ter Positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
[15]	Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. (2004) Letter Position Coding in Printed Word Perception: Effects of Repeated and Transposed Letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198
[16]	Frankish, C. and Turner, E. (2007) SIHGT and SUNOD: The Role of Orthography and Phonology in the Perception of Transposed Letter Anagrams. Journal of Mem-ory and Language, 56, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
[17]	Lee, C.H. and Taft, M. (2011) Subsyllabic Structure Reflected in Letter Confusability Effects in Korean Word Recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y
[18]	Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2006) Do Transposed-Letter Simi-larity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500298880
[19]	Rastle, K. and Davis, M.H. (2008) Morphological Decomposi-tion Based on the Analysis of Orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942-971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730
[20]	Taft, M. (2004) Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477
[21]	Rueckl, J.G. and Rimzhim, A. (2011) On the Interaction of Letter Transpositions and Morphemic Boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 482-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.500020
[22]	Masserang, K.M. and Pollatsek, A. (2012) Transposed Letter Effects in Prefixed Words: Implications for Morphological Decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 476-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.658037
[23]	Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. and Rastle, K. (2013) Letter Transpositions within and across Morphemic Boundaries: Is There a Cross-Language Difference? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 988-996. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0
[24]	Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S.F. and Rastle, K. (2013) Letter Transpositions within Morphemes and across Morpheme Boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2389-2410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.782326
[25]	Norris, D. and Kinoshita, S. (2008) Perception as Evidence Accumulation and Bayesian Inference: Insights from Masked Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012799
[26]	Kinoshita, S. and Norris, D. (2009) Transposed-Letter Priming of Orthographic Representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014277
[27]	Du？abeitia, J.A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M. and Norris, D. (2011) Is Morpho-Orthographic Decomposition Purely Orthographic? Evidence from Masked Priming in the Same-Different Task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.499215
[28]	Beyersmann, E., Castles, A. and Coltheart, M. (2011) Early Morphological Decomposition during Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Masked Transposed-Letter Priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 937-942. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0120-y
[29]	Beyersmann, E., Du？abeitia, J.A., Carreiras, M., Coltheart, M. and Castles, A. (2013) Early Morphological Decomposition of Suf？xed Words: Masked Priming Evidence with Transposed-Letter Nonword Primes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 869-892. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000057
[30]	Taft, M. and Nillsen, C. (2013) Morphological Decomposition and the Transposed-Letter (TL) Position Effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917-938. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.679662
[31]	Leck, K.J., Weekes, B.S. and Chen, M.J. (1995) Visual and Phonological Pathways to the Lexicon: Evidence from Chinese Readers. Memory and Cognition, 23, 468-476. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197248
[32]	Ding, G., Peng, D. and Taft, M. (2004) The Nature of the Mental Re-presentation of Radicals in Chinese: A Priming Study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.530
[33]	丁国盛, 彭聃龄. 汉语逆序词识别中整词与词素的关系[J]. 当代语言学, 2006(8): 36-45.
[34]	Bai, C., Cai, S. and Schumacher, P.B. (2011) Reversibility in Chinese Word For-mation Influences Target Identification. Neuroscience Letters, 499, 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.020
[35]	Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999) The Nature of Sub-lexical Processing in Reading Chinese Characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cog-nition, 25, 819-837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.819
[36]	Orfanidou, E., Davis, M.H. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2011) Orthographic and Semantic Opacity in Masked and Delayed Priming: Evidence from Greek. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 530-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.509055

Full-Text