全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Finance  2020 

环境表现对重污染企业融资成本的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Environmental Performance on Financing Cost of Heavy Polluting Enterprises

DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2020.103014, PP. 129-142

Keywords: 环境表现,债务融资成本,股权融资成本
Environmental Performance
, Debt Financing Cost, Equity Financing Cost

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

企业履行环保职责是保障国家高质量发展战略实施的重要一环,然而当前我国重污染企业的环境表现仍然差强人意。绿色信贷政策背景下,如何引导重污染企业注重自身环境表现,降低融资成本,以维系其顺利运转及发展壮大,已成为亟待解决的问题。本文实证分析了2013~2018年我国重污染行业上市公司环境表现对其融资成本的具体影响。结论如下:其一,企业环境表现对其债务融资成本有显著负向影响,对其股权融资成本影响不显著。其二,企业环境表现对其股权融资成本存在“倒U”型影响;非国有企业的环境表现与其债务融资成本显著负相关,而国有企业环境表现则对其债务融资成本有“倒U”型影响。非国有企业和国有企业环境表现对其股权融资成本均有“倒U”型影响,但相比国有企业而言,非国有企业股权融资成本对环境表现的敏感度更高。
The performance of enterprises in environmental protection is an important part of the imple-mentation of the high-quality development strategy. However, the environmental performance of China’s heavy polluting enterprises is still unsatisfactory. How to guide heavy polluting enterprises to pay attention to their own environmental performance so as to reduce financing cost to support and maintain the smooth operation and development of enterprises under the background of green-credit policy, has become an urgent problem to be solved. This study selected 605 heavy polluting listed companies from 2013 to 2018 as a sample. Several empirical conclusions were drawn. First, corporate environmental performance has a significantly negative impact on its debt financing cost, but insignificant on its equity financing cost. Second, the company’s environmental performance has an inverted “U” effect on equity financing cost. The environmental performance score of non-state-owned enterprises has a significantly negative correlation with their debt fi-nancing cost, while the environmental performance of state-owned enterprises has a “inverted U” effect on their debt financing cost. The environmental performance of non-state-owned enterprises and state-owned enterprises has a U-shaped effect on their equity financing cost, but compared to state-owned enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises’ equity financing cost is more sensitive to environmental performance.

References

[1]  曾颖, 陆正飞. 信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2006(2): 69-79.
[2]  沈洪涛, 马正彪. 地区经济发展压力、企业环境表现与债务融资[J]. 金融研究, 2014(2): 153-166.
[3]  李欣懿, 沈洪涛, 戚丽杏. 债权人在意企业的环境表现吗?——基于紫金矿业的案例分析[J]. 会计之友, 2015(10): 47-50.
[4]  Sharfman, M.P. and Fernando, C.S. (2008) Environmental Risk Management and the Cost of Capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569-592.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.678
[5]  邓学衷, 杨杰英. 环境责任与企业债务融资行为实证研究[J]. 科学经济社会, 2013, 31(4): 102-105.
[6]  舒利敏, 张俊瑞. 环境信息披露对银行信贷期限决策的影响——来自沪市重污染行业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 求索, 2014(6): 45-51.
[7]  Bharath, S.T., Sunder, J. and Sunder, S.V. (2008) Accounting Quality and Debt Contracting. The Accounting Review, 83, 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.1
[8]  罗丽佳. 上市企业环境信息披露质量对企业融资成本影响的差异性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018.
[9]  周楷唐, 麻志明, 吴联生. 高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2017(7): 171-185.
[10]  赵帆, 毕茜. 产权性质与企业环境信息披露[J]. 商业会计, 2013(15): 14-16.
[11]  李力, 刘全齐, 唐登莉. 碳绩效、碳信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(1): 221-235.
[12]  陈秋平, 潘越, 肖金利. 晋升激励, 地域偏爱与企业环境表现: 来自A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 47-56.
[13]  石蕾. 企业环境表现对其经济绩效的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京大学, 2018.
[14]  邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123.
[15]  朱凯, 陈信元. 金融发展、审计意见与上市公司融资约束[J]. 金融研究, 2009(7): 66-80.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133