In the past, there was an attempt to modify Newton’s gravitational theory, in a simple way, to consider relativistic effects. The approach was “abandoned” mainly because it predicted only half of Mercury’s precession. Here we will revisit this method and see how a small logical extension can lead to a relativistic Newtonian theory that predicts the perihelion precession of Mercury correctly.
References
[1]
Bagge, E.R. (1981) Relativistic Effects in the Solar System. Atomkernenergie Kerntechnik, 39, 223-228.
[2]
Phipps, T.E. (1986) Mercury’s Precession According to Special Relativity. American Journal of Physics, 54, 245-247. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14664
[3]
Einstein, A. (1916) Näherungsweise integration der feldgleichungen der gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin.
[4]
Chow, T. (1992) On Relativistic Newtonian Gravity. European Journal of Physics, 13, 198. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/13/4/010
[5]
Peters, P.C. (1986) Comment on “Mercury’s Precession According to Special Relativity”. American Journal of Physics, 55, 757. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15014
[6]
Phipps, T.E. (1986) Response to “Comment on ‘Mercury’s Precession According to Special Relativity”. American Journal of Physics, 55, 758-759. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15015
[7]
Biswas, T. (1988) Minimally Relativistic Newtonian Gravity. American Journal of Physics, 56, 1032. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15385
[8]
Peters, P.C. (1990) Comment on “Minimally Relativistic Newtonian Gravity”. American Journal of Physics, 56, 188. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16183
[9]
Ghosal, S.K. and Chakraborty, P. (1991) Relativistic Newtonian Gravity: An Improved Version. European Journal of Physics, 12, No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/12/6/003
[10]
Einstein, A. (1922) The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
