Background: A number of strategies exist for the implementation of clinical practice guides (CPGs). Aim: To assess the efficacy of implementing a cardiovascular risk CPG based on an educational method involving opinion leaders, and the habitual method of dissemination among primary healthcare teams. Design and Setting: Controlled, blinded, community intervention trial randomised by clusters. Methods: 21 primary healthcare centres were randomly assigned to either the intervention arm (n=11) or the control arm (n=10). The study subjects were patients aged ≥45 years assigned to the centres. The overall impact of the intervention was measured as the difference between the increase in the proportion of patients whose medical records showed the recording of all the variables necessary to calculate cardiovascular risk in both arms. Analyses were performed with Generalized Lineal Model on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: 917 subjects were included at the beginning of the trial (437 in the intervention arm and 480 in the control arm). 826 subjects were included in the final evaluation (436 in the intervention group and 390 in the control arm). At the end of the trial, the recording of the variables necessary for the calculation of the cardiovascular risk in the intervention group had increased more than in the control group (difference between increases 7.49% (95% CI 4.62-10.35)) after adjusting for confounding variables. Conclusions: Compared to the habitual method of dissemination, the implementation of this CPG
References
[1]
Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Institute of Medicine (1990) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
[2]
Woolf, S.H., Grol, R., Hutchinson, A., Eccles, M. and Grimshaw, J. (1999) Potential Benefits, Limitations, and Harms of Clinical Guidelines. British Medical Journal, 318, 527-530. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527
[3]
Grimshaw, J.M. and Russell, I.T. (1993) Effect of Clinical Guidelines on Medical Practice: A Systematic Review of Rigorous Evaluations. The Lancet, 342, 1317-1322.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N
[4]
Feder, G., Eccles, M., Grol, R., Griffiths, C. and Grimshaw, J. (1999) Clinical Guidelines: Using Clinical Guidelines. British Medical Journal, 318, 728-730.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7185.728
[5]
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (1999) Getting Evidence into Practice. Effective Health Care, 5, 1.
[6]
Grupo de trabajo sobre implementación de CPG (2009) Implementación de Guías de Práctica Clínica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Manual Metodológico. Plan Nacional para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud I+CS, Madrid.
[7]
Gagliardi, A., Brouwers, M., Palda, V., Lemieux-Charles, L. and Grimshaw, J. (2011) How Can We Improve Guideline Use? A Conceptual Framework of Implementability. Implementation Science, 6, 26.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-26
[8]
Brouwers, M., Makarski, J., Kastner, M., Hayden, L., Bhattacharyya, O. and the GUIDE-M Research Team (2015) The Guideline Implementability Decision Excellence Model (GUIDE-M): A Mixed Methods Approach to Create an International Resource to Advance the Practice Guideline Field. Implementation Science, 10, 36.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0225-1
[9]
Field, M.J. and Lohr, K.N. (1992) Guidelines for Clinical Practice. From Development to Use. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
[10]
Oxman, A.D., Thomson, M.A., Davis, D.A. and Haynes, R.B. (1995) No Magic Bullets: A Systematic Review of 102 Trials of Interventions to Improve Professional Practice. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 153, 1423-1431.
[11]
Grol, R. and Grimshaw, J. (2003) From Best Evidence to Best Practice: Effective Implementation of Change in Patients; Care. The Lancet, 362, 1225-1230.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1
[12]
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (2011) Data Collection Checklist. Institute of Population Health, Ontario.
[13]
Grimshaw, J.M., Thomas, R.E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C.R., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M.P., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., Wensing, M., Dijkstra, R. and Donaldson, C. (2004) Effectiveness and Efficiency of Guideline Dissemination and Implementation Strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8, 1-84.
https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8060
[14]
Grupo de trabajo sobre CPG (2006) Elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Plan Nacional para el SNS del MSC. Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (I +CS), Madrid.
[15]
Worrall, G., Chaulk, P. and Freake, D. (1997) The Effects of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Patient Outcomes in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 156, 1705-1712.
[16]
U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (1996) Guide to Clinical Preventive. 2nd Edition, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
[17]
Rodríguez-Salvanés, F., Novella, B., Fernández Luque, M.J., Sánchez-Gómez, L.M., Ruiz-Díaz, L., Sánchez-Alcalde, R., et al. (2011) Efficacy of a Strategy for Implementing a Guideline for the Control of Cardiovascular Risk in a Primary Healthcare Setting: The SIRVA2 Study a Controlled, Blinded Community Intervention Trial Randomised by Clusters. BMC Family Practice, 12, 21.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-21
[18]
Donner, A. and Donald, A. (1987) Analysis of Data Arising from Stratified Design with the Cluster as Unit of Randomization. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 43-52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060106
[19]
Hayes, R. and Moulton, L. (2009) Cluster Randomised Trials. Chapman & Hall, London. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781584888178
[20]
Eichler, K., Zoller, M., Tschudi, P. and Steurer, J. (2007) Barriers to Apply Cardiovascular Prediction Rules in Primary Care: A Postal Survey. BMC Family Practice, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-1
[21]
Hobbs, F.D. and Erhardt, L. (2002) Acceptance of Guideline Recommendations and Perceived Implementation of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention among Primary Care Physicians in Five European Countries: The Reassessing European Attitudes about Cardiovascular Treatment (REACT) Survey. Family Practice, 19, 596-604.
https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.6.596
[22]
Brotons, C., Lobos, J.M., Royo-Bordonada, M.A., Maiques, A., de Santiago, A., Castellanos, A., et al. (2013) Implementation of Spanish Adaptation of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Primary Care. BMC Family Practice, 14, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-36
[23]
Hall, L.M.L., Jung, R.T. and Leese, G.P. (2003) Controlled Trial of Effect of Documented Cardiovascular Risk Scores on Prescribing. British Medical Journal, 326, 251-252. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7383.251
[24]
Suárez, C., álvarez-Sala, L., Mostaza, J., Asenjo, C. and Grupo Multidisciplinario para el Estudio del Riesgo Cardiovascular (2007) Cálculo del riesgo cardiovascular. Medicina Clínica, 129, 534-541. https://doi.org/10.1157/13111428
[25]
Dallongeville, J., Banegas, J.R., Tubach, F., Guallar, E., Borghi, C., De Backer, G., et al. (2012) Survey of Physicians’ Practices in the Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The EURIKA Study. The European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 19, 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826711407705
[26]
Campbell, M.K., Grimshaw, J.M. and Elbourne, D.R. (2004) Intracluster Correlation Coefficients in Cluster Randomized Trials: Empirical Insights into How Should They Be Reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-9
[27]
Mostofian, F., Ruban, C., Simunovic, N. and Bhandari, M. (2015) Changing Physician Behavior: What Works? American Journal of Managed Care, 21, 75-84.
[28]
Fretheim, A., Oxman, A.D., Havelsrud, K., Treweek, S., Kristoffersen, D.T. and Bjorndal, A. (2006) Rational Prescribing in Primary Care (RaPP): A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Tailored Intervention. PLoS Medicine, 3, e134.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030134
[29]
Lemelin, J., Hogg, W. and Baskerville, N. (2001) Evidence to Action: A Tailored Multifaceted Approach to Changing Family Physician Practice Patterns and Improving Preventive Care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164, 757-763.
[30]
Etxeberria, A., Alcorta, I., Pérez, I., Emparanza, J.I., Ruiz de Velasco, E., Iglesias, M.T., et al. (2018) Results from the CLUES Study: A Cluster Randomized Trial for the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Guideline Implementation in Primary Care in Spain. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 93.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2863-x