This case study addresses the Forest Service reauthorization for grazing of domestic sheep in Utah’s High Uintas Wilderness, USA. It provides an approach using spatial analysis and aerial imagery to evaluate the lands capable of being grazed based on Forest Service criteria and field surveys. The resulting model and analysis demonstrated that the Forest Service has not applied its own criteria. This has led to the Forest Service overestimating the amount of land and numbers of sheep that can be supported in the study area. Past field studies show this has resulted in environmental damage by grazing sheep. Our analysis concludes that the numbers of domestic sheep should be greatly reduced to protect these lands and wilderness values. Limitations of the study include the lack of a suitably detailed soil survey to determine erosion susceptibility, a lack of ground cover data, a lack of Forest Service data for the level of grazing use, or utilization, and the lack of a Forest Service quantitative measurement of vegetation production in each plant community and soil type. In the end, our use of aerial imagery, GIS determinations of areas of steep slopes and dense forests, and our measurement of vegetation production in the dominant soil types showed most of the land is not capable for grazing domestic sheep even in the absence of this other data.
References
[1]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2014) Scoping Notice-High Uintas Wilderness Domestic Sheep Analysis. Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Salt Lake City, UT.
[2]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2019) Draft Environmental Impact Statement High Uintas Wilderness Domestic Sheep Analysis. Ashley and Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forests. Salt Lake City, UT.
[3]
Gabathuler, E., Liniger, H., Hauert, C. and Giger, M. (2009) Benefits of Sustainable Land Management. World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies, Center for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
[4]
Fleischner, T. (1994) Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America. Conservation Biology, 8, 629-644.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030629.x
[5]
Wilderness Watch (WW) (2019) The Cattle Compromise: Livestock’s Damaging Effect on Wilderness and the Way Toward a Livestock-Free Wilderness System. Wilderness Watch, Missoula, MT.
https://wildernesswatch.org/images/wild-issues/2019/01-2019-WW-Policy-Paper-Grazing.pdf
[6]
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) (1988) Rangeland Management: More Emphasis Needed on Declining and Overstocked Grazing Allotments. Washington DC.
[7]
Utah State University Extension (USU) (2019) Utah Major Watersheds.
https://extension.usu.edu/waterquality/learnaboutsurfacewater/watersheds/ utahmajorwatersheds
[8]
Bates, W. and Jones, A. (2007) Least-cost Corridor Analysis for Evaluation of Lynx Habitat Connectivity in the Middle Rockies. Wild Utah Project, Salt Lake City, UT.
https://app.box.com/s/0g8b1ryqg1iz6r1fd61rdkc8fso97oh5
[9]
Lewis, L. and Wenger, C.R. (1998) Idaho’s Canada Lynx: Pieces of the Puzzle. Idaho Bureau of Land Management Technical Bulletin No. 98-15.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.63223
[10]
Jones, A., Catlin, J., Lind, T., Frelich, J., Robinson, K., Flaherty, L., Molvar, E., Kessler, J. and Daly, K. (2004) The Heart of the West Conservation Plan. Wild Utah Project, Salt Lake City, UT.
https://wildlandsnetwork.org/resources/heart-west-conservation-plan/
[11]
Noss, R., Wuerthner, G., Vance-Borland, K. and Carroll, C. (2001) A Biological Conservation Assessment for the Utah-Wyoming Rocky Mountains Ecoregion: Report to The Nature Conservancy. Conservation Science, Inc., Corvallis, OR.
https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPlanning/SettingPriorities /EcoregionalReports/Documents/uwrm_plan_ver2001.pdf
[12]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2003) Revised Forest Plan Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Salt Lake City, UT.
[13]
Jones, A. (2000) Effects of Cattle Grazing on North American Arid Ecosystems: A Quantitative Review. Western North American Naturalist, 60, 155-164.
[14]
Belsky, A.J., Matzke, A. and Uselman, S. (1999) Survey of Livestock Influences on Stream and Riparian Ecosystems in the Western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 54, 419-431.
[15]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2019b) Historical Range Analysis and Monitoring Data for the Ashley and Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forests. Region 4 Forest Service. Ogden, UT.
[16]
Lewis, M. (1970) Alpine Rangelands of the Uinta Mountains, Ashley and Wasatch National Forests. Region 4 Forest Service. Ogden, UT.
https://app.box.com/s/mdf4yl6ss5glbip50kd6hh4fayczi4qr
[17]
Munroe, J.S., Klem, C.M. and Bigl, M.F. (2013) A Lacustrine Sedimentary Record of Holocene Periglacial Activity from the Uinta Mountains, Utah, U.S.A. Quaternary Research, 79, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2012.12.006
[18]
Carter, J. (2007) Watershed Conditions-Uinta Wilderness, Utah, West Fork Blacks’ Fork, East Fork Blacks’ Fork, Lake Fork, Middle Fork Beaver Creek, Burnt Fork. Western Watersheds Project, Hailey, ID.
https://app.box.com/s/944957604b8618539585
[19]
Oprandy, C. and Voerner, D. (2019) Photographs and Notes Provided to the Authors.
[20]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2003b) Final Environmental Impact Statement Wasatch-Cache National Forest Revised Forest Plan: Appendix B9. Salt Lake City, UT.
[21]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1986) Ashley National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Ashley National Forest, Vernal, UT.
[22]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1964) R4 Range Analysis Handbook. Region 4 U.S. Forest Service. Ogden, UT. https://app.box.com/shared/sfq4pr9p2k
[23]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1998) Rangeland Capability and Suitability Determinations for Forest Plan Revisions R-4 Revised 2/20/98. Region 4 Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
[24]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2016) Interoffice Email Communication from Sandra Remund-Kaminski to Paul Cowley Stating They Used the 1960’s Determination of Capable Lands for the Ashley National Forest Allotments.
[25]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1978) Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbook No. 537.
https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/64080530/RUSLE/AH_537.pdf
[26]
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2015) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.5.1. Redlands, CA.
[27]
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2004) ModelBuilder.
https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.5/analyze/modelbuilder/what-is-modelbuilder.htm
[28]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2014) Geographic Information Data. Region 4 Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
[29]
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2013) USGS NED n41w111 1/3 Arc-Second 2013 1x1 Degree IMG. Raster Digital Data. Reston, VA.
http://ned.usgs.gov
[30]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2016) NAIP Digital Ortho Photo Image TIF. Remote Sensing Image. USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office, Salt Lake City, UT.
https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/aerial-photography/imagery -programs/naip-imagery/index
[31]
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2016) National Wetlands Inventory CONUS_wet_poly_West. Shapefile. Washington DC.
https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/
[32]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2014) Maps and Data Files for Grazing Suitability-High Uintas Domestic Sheep Project Area. Region 4 Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
[33]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2016) High Uinta Sheep Allotment Pastures. Shapefile. U.S. Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Supervisor’s Office, Salt Lake City, UT.
[34]
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2016) National Hydrography Dataset Water Bodies. Geodatabase Polygon Feature Class. USGS-National Geospatial Technical Operations Center (NGTOC), Rolla, MO and Denver, CO.
http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/
[35]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2001) U.S. Forest Service. Ashley National Forest Cattle and Sheep Grazing Capability Layer. Shapefile.
[36]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2001) U.S. Forest Service: Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forests Cattle and Sheep Grazing Capability Layer. Shapefile. USDA Region 4 Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
[37]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2011) Soils: High Uinta Sheep: Shapefile. Uinta Wasatch Cache National Forest. Salt Lake City, UT.
[38]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2016) The Land Type Map of Component Vegetation, Soil, and Geology-Ashley National Forest. Shapefile. U.S. Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Natural Resource Manager Office. Salt Lake City, UT.
[39]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2014) Brief Soil Descriptions Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Region 4 Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
[40]
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (1996) Utilization Studies and Residual Measurements-Interagency Technical Reference 1734-03. BLM National Applied Resource Science Center, Denver, CO.
[41]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2017) National Agricultural Statistics Service. Livestock Slaughter.
[42]
Holechek, J.L., Pieper, R.D. and Herbel, C.H. (2004) Range Management Principles and Practices. 5th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[43]
Cole, D.N. and Landres, P.B. (1996) Threats to Wilderness Ecosystems: Impacts and Research Needs. Ecological Applications, 6, 168-184.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2269562
[44]
Ruediger, B., Claar, J., Mighton, S., Naney, B., Rinaldi, T., Wahl, F., Warren, N., Wenger, D., Williamson, A., Lewis, L., Holt, B., Patton, G., Trick, J., Vandehey, A. and Gniadek, S. (2000) Canada Lynx Conservation Assessment and Strategy. USDA Forest Service, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, and USDI National Park Service. Forest Service Publication, Missoula, MT.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfwspubs/197
[45]
Toweill, D.E. and Geist, V. (1999) Return of Royalty-Wild Sheep of North America. Boone and Crocket Club, Foundation for North American Wild Sheep, Missoula, MT.
[46]
Monello, R.J., Murray, D.L. and Cassirer, E.F. (2001) Ecological Correlates of Pneumonia Epizootics in Bighorn Sheep Herds. The Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 1423-1432. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-103
