全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

庭审直播与当事人隐私权保护的冲突与衡平
Conflict and Equity between Live Court Proceedings and Privacy Protection of the Parties

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2020.61004, PP. 18-24

Keywords: 庭审直播,隐私权,技术处理,救济,意识, Privacy Right, Technical Treatment, Relief, Consciousness

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着网上司法公开的推进,庭审直播已经成为审判流程公开的重要窗口。在通过庭审直播提升司法透明度的同时,当事人的隐私权也面临着被侵犯的风险。通过对庭审直播中当事人隐私权保护的现状进行分析,目前我国庭审直播过程中当事人的隐私权保护存在法律依据不完备、司法工作人员隐私权保护意识薄弱、技术处理不足以及缺乏对当事人隐私权遭受损害后的救济等问题,需要通过完善庭审直播中隐私权保护的具体规定、加强司法工作人员的隐私权保护意识、明确技术处理的范围和措施以及构建隐私权遭受侵犯后的救济和赔偿机制等措施对庭审直播中当事人的隐私权予以保护。
With the promotion of online judicial openness, live trial has become an important window of open trial process. While promoting judicial transparency through live court proceedings, the privacy of the parties also faces the risk of being violated. The current situation of the privacy protection of the litigants in the live trial is analyzed. At present, there are some problems in the protection of the privacy of the litigants in the process of live hearing in China, such as incomplete legal basis, weak privacy protection awareness of judicial staff, inadequate technical treatment and lack of remedies for the infringement of the privacy of the litigants. Therefore, it is necessary to protect the privacy rights of the parties in live court trials by improving the specific provisions of privacy protection in live court trials, strengthening the privacy protection awareness of judicial staff, clarifying the scope and measures of technical treatment, and constructing relief and compensation mechanism after the violation of privacy.

References

[1]  王利明, 杨立新. 人格权与新闻侵权[M]. 北京: 中国方正出版社, 2000.
[2]  中国法院网. 首次人民法院庭审公开第三方评估报告出炉[EB/OL].
https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2018/08/id/3450479.shtml, 2018-08-09.
[3]  人民网. 中国庭审公开网直播案件破400万场[EB/OL].
http://legal.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0724/c42510-31253033.html, 2019-07-24.
[4]  坚持推动庭审直播常态化 直播量位列全国第一江苏法院庭审直播突破100万场[N]. 人民法院报, 2019-09-19(01).
[5]  王利明. 隐私权概念的再界定[J]. 法学家, 2012(1): 108-120+178.
[6]  姜昕. 比例原则释义学结构构建及反思[J]. 法律学科, 2008, 26(5): 45-56.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133