中学生课程主观难度在学习风格与意志力上的差异研究
The Differences of Subjective Difficulty in Learning Style and Willpower among Middle School Students

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.93075, PP. 599-608

Keywords: 初中生，学习风格，意志力，课程主观难度，对偶比较
Middle School Students, Learning Style, Willpower, Course Subjective Difficulty, Method of Paired Comparison

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

通过对偶比较法考察不同学习风格和意志力初中生的课程主观难度。使用所罗门学习风格量表、意志力量表对436名中学生进行调查，结果发现：1) 中学生在不同性别、年级、意志力层次以及部分学习风格上对课程主观难度的评估差异显著；2) 课程的主观难度与意志力得分之间存在显著相关。性别、年级、意志力以及学习风格等因素对初中生课程主观难度具有重要影响。
The subjective difficulty of junior high school students in different learning styles and willpowers was examined by the method of paired comparison. A survey of 436 middle school students was conducted using the Solomon Learning Style Scale and the Willpower Scale. The results showed that: 1) Middle school students had significant differences in the assessment of course subjective difficulty in different genders, grades, willpower levels, and part of the learning style; 2) There was a significant correlation between the subjective difficulty of the course and the willpower score. Factors such as gender, grade, willpower and learning style had an important influence on the subjective difficulty of junior high school students.

References

[1]	安会云, 吕琳, 尚晓静(2005). 学习风格研究综述. 现代中小学教育, No. 4, 4-7.
[2]	边伟, 王晓诚, 车丽娜(2017). 基于学生视角的语文教科书信息文本难度评析——以人民教育出版社小学高年级语文教科书为例. 教育科学研究, No. 10, 48-53.
[3]	陈美荣, 曾晓青(2012). 国内外学习风格研究述评. 上海教育科研, No. 12, 18-21.
[4]	陈燕(2009). 初中生英语学习性别差异的调查与分析. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[5]	东雪珍(2007). 中学生英语词汇学习策略研究. 硕士论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[6]	龚自方(2001). 对偶比较法及其在心理与教育研究中的应用. 心理科学, 24(4), 496-496.
[7]	郭玉峰(2014). 中澳高中数学课程难度的量化研究. 中国教育学刊, No. 4, 73-78.
[8]	洪雅琴(2014). 高中生物学习中的性别差异及教学策略研究. 硕士论文, 南昌: 江西师范大学.
[9]	李高峰(2010). 课程难度模型运用中的偏差及其修正——与史宁中教授等商榷. 上海教育科研, No. 3, 46-49.
[10]	李洁(2011). 学习风格与英语学习策略及学习成绩的相关研究. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 33(4), 72-78.
[11]	马婷婷, 童艳肆(2014). 基于语言学视角的历史教科书难度定量分析——以普通高中新课程岳麓版为例. 教学与管理, No. 33, 117-119.
[12]	谭顶良(1994). 论学习风格及其研究价值. 南京师大学报: 社会科学版, No. 3, 46-50.
[13]	田晓明, 冯成志(2009). 对偶比较法、等级排列法和两极递进式排序法的比较. 心理科学, 32(4), 788-791.
[14]	王中会, 许燕(2005). 学习风格、学业自我概念与学业成绩的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13(2), 203-205.
[15]	杨朝青, 黄珊珊(2017). 基于学习风格的初中英语合作学习的实证研究.现代中小学教育, 33(12), 48-52.
[16]	杨承印, 程雷(2009). 高中化学教材难度的定量分析与评价——以三套化学教科书选修4之“溶液中的离子平衡”主题为例. 化学教学, No. 9, 29-31.
[17]	杨承印, 韩俊卿(2007). 义务教育新课标教科书课程难度定量分析. 教育科学, 23(1), 32-35.
[18]	杨海波, 杨加震, 刘电芝(2014). Kolb学习风格、学习策略与化学成绩的关系. 化学教育, 35(21), 51-53.
[19]	张恩德(2017). 我国近二十年课程难度研究的歧见与启示. 教育科学研究, No. 4, 62-68.
[20]	张林, 张向葵(2003). 中学生学习策略运用、学习效能感、学习坚持性与学业成就关系的研究. 心理科学, 26(4), 603-607.
[21]	张燕(2013). 别忽视了英语教学中意志力的培养. 语数外学习: 英语教育, No. 6, 163.
[22]	张燕南, 张力, 周涛, 章国英(2010). 学习风格对网络学习的影响: 一项实证研究. 开放教育研究, 16(3), 160-166.
[23]	赵亚男, 郑日昌(2006). 中学生意志力问卷的编制. 中国健康心理学杂志, 14(5), 531-533.
[24]	朱雪芳, 叶立军(2014). 中国和澳大利亚高中数学微积分教材比较研究. 数学教育学报, 23(2), 25-27.
[25]	Collinson, E. (2000). A Survey of Elementary Students’ Learning Style Preferences and Academic Success. Contemporary Education, 71, 42.
[26]	Duckworth, A. L. (2011). The Significance of Self-Control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2639-2640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019725108
[27]	Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What No Child Left Behind Leaves behind: The Roles of IQ and Self-Control in Predicting Standardized Achievement Test Scores and Report Card Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 439-451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026280
[28]	Elosua, P. (2007). Assessing Vocational Interests in the Basque Country Using Paired Comparison Design. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.001
[29]	Fitch, J. L., & Ravlin, E. C. (2005). Willpower and Perceived Behavioral Control: Influences on the Intention-Behavior Relationship and Postbehavior Attributions. Social Behavior & Personality, 33, 105-124. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.2.105
[30]	Job, V., Walton, G. M., Bernecker, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Beliefs about Willpower Determine the Impact of Glucose on Self-Control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 14837-14842. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313475110
[31]	Ock, M., Yi, N., Ahn, J., & Jo, M. W. (2016). How Many Alternatives Can Be Ranked? A Comparison of the Paired Comparison and Ranking Methods. Value in Health, 19, 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1836
[32]	Pasternak, R. (2013). Discipline, Learning Skills and Academic Achievement. Journal of Arts and Education, 1, 1-11.

Full-Text