全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

情绪激活对个体自欺水平影响的实验研究
An Experimental Study on the Effect of Emotional Activation on Self-Deception

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.94088, PP. 708-716

Keywords: 自我欺骗,情绪激活,点追踪任务
Self-Deception
, Emotional Activation, Dot-Tracking Task

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

自欺现象在生活中非常普遍,它可以减少人们说谎时的认知负荷,并在一定程度上帮助个体抵御负面情绪和负性的自我认知。但另一方面,个体的高自欺水平往往与低自尊联系在一起,随着自我洞察力提升,个体会希望减少自欺。本文的初衷是探究降低个体自欺水平的有效的途径。前人研究指出情绪影响着个体的认知过程,于是猜想个体在认知过程中产生自欺可能受到情绪状态的影响,个体为了调节心理状态而发生自我欺骗。所以本研究运用了视频片段激活个体情绪并采用点追踪实验范式对其自欺水平进行研究,旨在考察个体在情绪唤起状态下自我欺骗水平的变化情况。最终的结论——处于情绪(悲伤、恐惧、快乐)唤起状态的个体相较于中性情绪组有更高的自欺水平——为心理工作者提供了实证支持。
Self-deception is a common phenomenon in life. It can reduce the cognitive load when people lie and help individuals to resist negative emotions and negative self-cognition to a certain extent. However, on the other hand, individuals’ high level of self-deception is often associated with low self-esteem. With the improvement of self-perception, individuals hope to reduce self-deception. The original intention of this paper is to explore an effective way to reduce the level of individuals’ self-deception. Previous studies have pointed out that emotions affect an individual’s cognitive process, so it is assumed that self-deception in the cognitive process may be affected by emotional state, and self-deception occurs in order to adjust the psychological state. Therefore, this study uses video fragment to activate individuals’ emotions and adopts the dot-tracking experiment paradigm to study their self-deception level, aiming to investigate the changes of individual self-deception level under the emotional arousal state. The final conclusion that individuals under the emotional arousal state (sadness, fear and happiness) have a higher level of self-deception than those in the neutral emotional group provides empirical support for psychological workers.

References

[1]  Audi, R. (1982). Self-Deception, Action, and Will. Erkenntnis, 18, 133-158.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227930
[2]  Baumgartner, T., Esslen, M., & J?ncke, L. (2006). From Emotion Perception to Emotion Experience: Emotions Evoked by Pictures and Classical Music. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 34-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.04.007
[3]  Campbell, J. (1986). Similarity and Uniqueness: The Effects of Attribute Type, Relevance, and Individual Differences in Self-Esteem and Depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 282-294.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.281
[4]  Cook-Greuter, S. (1999). Post Autonomous Ego Development: Its Nature and Measurement. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Educa-tion.
[5]  Fingarette, H. (2000). Self-Deception. London: University of California Press.
[6]  Freud, S. (1950). Splitting of the Ego in the Defensive Process. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Collected Papers (Vol. V, pp. 372-375). London: Hogarth Press (Original Work Published 1938).
[7]  Funder, D. (2011). Directions and Beliefs of Self-Presentational Bias (Open Peer Commentary on von Hippel and Trivers, 2011). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 22-23.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10002086
[8]  Gur, R., & Sackeim, H. A. (1979). Self-Deception: A Concept in Search of a Phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 147-169.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.147
[9]  Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
[10]  Mele, A. R. (1997). Real Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 91-102.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000034
[11]  Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and Denial in Socially Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307
[12]  Pinker, S. (2011). Representations and Decision Rules in the Theory of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 35-37.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1000261X
[13]  Preti, A., & Miotto, P. (2006). Mental Disorders, Evolution and Inclusive Fitness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 419-420.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06379095
[14]  Rorty, A. (1994). User-Friendly Self-Deception. Philosophy, 69, 211-228.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100046854
[15]  Sackeim, H. A. (1983). Self-Deception, Self-Esteem, and Depression: The Adaptive Value of Lying to Oneself. In J. Masling (Ed.), Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytical Theories (pp. 101-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[16]  Sloman, S. A., Fernbach, P. M., & Hagmayer, Y. (2010). Self-Deception Requires Vagueness. Cognition, 115, 268-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.017
[17]  Starek, J., & Keating, C. (1991). Self-Deception and Its Relationship to Success in Competition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 145-155.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1202_2
[18]  Thummes, K. (2013). Deception in Strategic communication. An Analysis in Communication Science. Wiesbaden: Springer.
[19]  Von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The Evolution and Psychology of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001354
[20]  Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Learning to Detect Deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 519-528.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.519

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133