全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

综述国际流域生态修复发展趋势及借鉴意义
Review the Development Trend of Ecological Restoration in International Watersheds and Its Reference Significance

DOI: 10.12677/GSER.2019.82024, PP. 221-233

Keywords: 流域治理,生态修复,美丽中国,国土空间治理
Watershed Management
, Ecological Restoration, Beautiful China, Territorial Space Governance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究将国外流域生态修复发展进程划分为单一流域问题治理和综合目标流域治理两个阶段,单一流域问题整治阶段可分为水资源时期与水质时期;综合目标流域整治阶段可分为水生态时期(主要是生物多样性)和多功能时期(综合社会需求以及城乡发展)。本研究将国际流域生态修复发展趋势总结为:流域生态修复目标的多元化–流域生态型修复措施的再自然化–流域生态修复主体的公众化。本研究将国际流域生态修复的经验对我国流域生态修复的启示总结为以下几个方面:1) 以流域为单元的国土空间整治修复应以水为核心;2) 国土空间流域整治修复需要确定目标的优先级;3) 流域问题应该多功能系统整治;4) 流域问题应根据城市化程度和自然要素进行分区治理;5) 流域治理应建立完善的“监测、评价、规划”循环体系,且以问题为导向保证规划的落实;6) 流域治理应注重多层面全方位参与和立法支撑;7) 科研重点应侧重于对本土生态系统的详细区划与物种结构、本土生态系统自然演替路径、流域生态系统弹性阈值三方面的研究;8) 针对不同地区发展状况应区别借鉴国外流域治理经验。
The study divides the development process of international watershed ecological restoration into two stages: single watershed problem control and compound watershed problem control. The single watershed problem remediation stage can be divided into water resources period and water quality period. The comprehensive target watershed remediation stage can be divided into water ecological period (mainly biodiversity) and multi-functional period (combining social needs with urban and rural development). This study summarizes the development trend of international watershed ecological restoration as: the diversification of watershed ecological restoration objectives—the re-naturalization of watershed ecological restoration measures public participation in watershed ecological restoration. This study summarizes the enlightenment of the experience of international watershed ecological restoration to the ecological restoration of China’s river basins as follows: 1) Watershed-based ecological restoration of land space should be based on water; 2) Remediation of land space remediation needs to determine the priority of the problem; 3) Watershed problems should be rectified by multi-functional systems; 4) Watershed problems should be managed according to the degree of urbanization and natural factors; 5) A sound “monitoring, evaluation, planning” cycle system should be established, and problem-oriented to ensure the implementation of the plan; 6) Watershed governance should focus on multi-agent participation and legislative support; 7) Research should focus on the detailed zoning and species structure of native ecosystems, the natural succession path of native ecosystems, and the study of the elastic threshold of watershed ecosystems; 8) We should learn from the experience of foreign river basin management according to the development of different regions.

References

[1]  李建华, 蔡尚伟. “美丽中国”的科学内涵及其战略意义[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013(5): 135-140.
[2]  莫纪宏. 党的十九大报告与习近平新时代中国特色社会主义法治思想的特征[J]. 中国检察官, 2018(9): 47-51.
[3]  谷树忠, 胡咏君, 周洪. 生态文明建设的科学内涵与基本路径[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(1): 2-13.
[4]  周汉民. 生态文明与美丽中国[J]. 上海市社会主义学院学报, 2012(6): 38-40.
[5]  秦书生, 胡楠. 习近平美丽中国建设思想及其重要意义[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(6): 633-638.
[6]  吴鹏. 论生态修复的基本内涵及其制度完善[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(6): 628-632.
[7]  焦居仁. 生态修复的要点与思考[J]. 中国水土保持, 2003(2): 1-2.
[8]  王夏晖, 等. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复思路与实践[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(3): 17-20.
[9]  习近平. 在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话[N]. 人民日报, 2018, 04-26-2018.
[10]  赖权有, 钱竞. 关于机构改革后建立空间规划体系的思考[J]. 特区经济, 2018(8): 31-34.
[11]  林俊强, 等. 河流生态修复的顶层设计思考[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(4): 483-491.
[12]  陈兴茹. 国内外河流生态修复相关研究进展[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2011, 32(5): 122-128.
[13]  王文君, 黄道明. 国内外河流生态修复研究进展[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2012, 33(4): 142-146.
[14]  Clarke, S.J., Bruce-Burgess, L. and Wharton, G. (2010) Linking Form and Function: Towards an Eco-Hydromorphic Approach to Sustainable River Restoration. Aquatic Conservation Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, 439-450.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.591
[15]  Pope, R. (1996) Reviewed Work: River Channel Restoration: Guiding Prin-ciples for Sustainable Projects by Andrew Brookes, F. Douglas Shields Jr. The Geographical Journal, 163, 311-312.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3059752
[16]  董哲仁. 河流生态系统研究的理论框架[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(2): 129-137.
[17]  石秋池. 欧盟水框架指令及其执行情况[J]. 中国水利, 2005(22): 65-66+52.
[18]  彭文启, 等. 流域水环境与生态学研究回顾与展望[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(9): 1055-1067.
[19]  俞孔坚. 美丽中国的水生态基础设施: 理论与实践[J]. 鄱阳湖学刊, 2015(1): 5-18.
[20]  Shamik Chakraborty, 等. 尼罗河及其流域环境的近期变化: 以文献为依据[J]. 资源与生态学报(英文版), 2015, 6(5): 345-352.
[21]  黄德春, 陈思萌. 国外流域可持续发展的实践与启示[J]. 水利经济, 2007, 25(6): 10-12.
[22]  陈兴茹, 王兴勇, 白音包力皋. 湄公河流域洪旱灾害损失分析[J]. 水利经济, 2019, 37(1): 54-58+81.
[23]  宗世荣, 赵润. 国际流域管理模式分析以及对我国流域管理的启示[J]. 环境科学导刊, 2016, 35(z1): 30-33.
[24]  崔曙平, 王莉. 伦敦泰晤士河水环境治理的经验与启示[J]. 江苏建设, 2016(4): 69-73.
[25]  贾德龙, 张万益, 崔敏利. 美国密西西比河流域治理的若干启示[N]. 中国矿业报, 2018, 03-07-2018.
[26]  杜晓敏, 郑人瑞, 杨宗喜. 莱茵河流域综合治理经验与启示[N]. 中国矿业报, 2018, 06-20-2018.
[27]  黄怡. 从ICPDR看跨国河流管理机制及其对中国的启示[J]. 法制与社会, 2019(8): 109-110.
[28]  谢全生. 阿根廷拉普拉塔和巴拉那河情况介绍[J]. 天津航海, 2000(4): 45-49.
[29]  刘德生. 世界自然地理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1986: 78-95.
[30]  朱之鑫. 国际统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2001.
[31]  胡文俊, 陈霁巍, 张长春. 多瑙河流域国际合作实践与启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(7): 739-745.
[32]  ICPDR (2008) Outline of the Danube River Basin District Management Plan Part A-Basin-Wide Overview.
[33]  Omernik, J., Paulsen, S., Griffith, G. and Weber, M. (2016) Regional Patterns of Total Nitrogen Concentrations in the National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71, 167-181.
https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.167
[34]  周勤. 美国跨州流域事务治理经验及启示[J]. 水利发展研究, 2013, 13(4): 71-75.
[35]  姜彤. 莱茵河流域水环境管理的经验对长江中下游综合治理的启示[J]. 水资源保护, 2002(3): 45-50+70.
[36]  石青. 拉美的取宝盆——开发中的拉普拉塔河流域[J]. 世界知识, 1981(9): 16-17.
[37]  Siegel, K.M. (2017) Regional Environmental Cooperation in South America. Springer Nature, Switzerland.
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55874-9
[38]  Camillo, C.A. (2012) Divine Providence: The 2011 Flood in the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project.
[39]  Dubowy, P.J. (2013) Mississippi River Ecohydrology: Past, Present and Future. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 13, 73-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.02.003
[40]  Hudson, P.F., Middelkoop, H. and Stouthamer, E. (2008) Flood Management along the Lower Mississippi and Rhine Rivers (The Netherlands) and the Continuum of Geomorphic Adjustment. Geomorphology, 101, 209-236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.07.001
[41]  Rabalais, N.N. and Turner, R.E. (2011) 11.04-Management Case Study: Mississippi River. Treatise on Estuarine & Coastal Science, 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374711-2.01105-0
[42]  Groot, S.J.D. (2002) A Review of the Past and Present Status of Anadromous Fish Species in the Netherlands: Is Restocking the Rhine Feasible? In: Nienhuis, P.H. and Gulati, R.D., Eds., Ecological Restoration of Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Ecosystems in the Netherlands (NW Europe). Developments in Hydrobiology, Springer, Dordrecht, 205-218.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1335-1_11
[43]  Remo, J.W.F., Heine, R.A. and Ickes, B.S. (2016) Particle Size Distribution of Main-Channel-Bed Sediments along the Upper Mississippi River, USA. Geomorphology, 264, 118-131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.04.012
[44]  周洲, 丰景春, 张可. 国际河流信息合作机制及其对中国的启示[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(6): 1238-1244.
[45]  席恺媛, 朱虹. 长三角区域生态一体化的实践探索与困境摆脱[J]. 改革, 2019(3): 87-96.
[46]  成金华, 尤喆. “山水林田湖草是生命共同体”原则的科学内涵与实践路径[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 1-6.
[47]  周伟. 生态环境保护与修复的多元主体协同治理——以祁连山为例[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2018(2): 250-255.
[48]  张丹. 欧盟景观政策发展研究[J]. 城市规划, 2011, 35(12): 57-61.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133