解释水平、未来自我连续性对健康决策的影响
Construal Level, Future Self-Continuity Impact on Health Decisions

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.95114, PP. 925-934

Keywords: 解释水平，未来自我连续性，感知健康程度，热量，含脂量
Construal Level, Future Self-Continuity, Perceived Healthiness, Calories, The Amount of Fat

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了考察解释水平和未来自我连续性对健康决策的影响，本研究采用2 (未来自我连续性：强vs弱) × 2 (解释水平：高vs低)的被试间实验设计，将126名高中生分在四个班级元旦晚会的场景中去选取食物。结果表明：1) 解释水平与未来自我连续性对感知健康程度的影响存在交互效应。强未来自我连续性时，高解释水平操纵下的被试所选食物的感知健康程度高于低解释水平者。2) 强未来自我连续性操纵下的被试所选食物总热量和含脂总量均低于弱未来自我连续性者。因此，我们认为解释水平与未来自我连续性在主观健康决策(感知健康程度)上存在交互作用，未来自我连续性会影响客观健康决策(总热量和含脂总量)。
The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of construal level and future self-continuity on health decisions. Using the experimental design of 2 (Future Self-continuity: Strong vs. Weak) × 2 (Construl Level: High vs. Low), 126 high school students were divided into four classes on New Year’s Day to select foods. The results showed that: 1) There is an interactive effect between construal level and the impact of future self-continuity on perceived health. In the strong future self-continuity, perceived healthiness of the selected foods under high construal level manipulation was higher than those with low level. 2) The amount of fat and calories of the selected foods under the manipulation of strong future self-continuity was lower than those of the weak. So, we can conclude that there is an interaction between construal level and future self-continuity in subjective health decisions (perceived healthiness). And future self-continuity has influence on health decisions in objective terms (the amount of fat and calories).

References

[1]	阿不来提江, 刘扬, 朱晓睿, 等(2015). 自我对跨期决策的影响——基于个人–集体主义文化视角. 心理科学进展, 23(11), 1981-1990.
[2]	曹娇(2015). 大学生未来自我连续性、性格优势与健康行为的关系研究. 重庆: 西南大学.
[3]	陈海贤, 何贵兵(2011). 识解水平对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 442-452.
[4]	陈海贤, 何贵兵(2014). 心理距离对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 46(5), 677-690.
[5]	华生旭, 吕厚超(2012). 心理距离与建构水平的双向作用关系. 心理科学, 35(6), 1519-1523.
[6]	黄俊, 李晔, 张宏伟(2015). 解释水平理论的应用及发展. 心理科学进展, 23(1), 110-119.
[7]	黄俊, 李晔, 张宏伟(2016). 解释水平理论完善过程中的四个问题. 心理科学, 39(4), 887-892.
[8]	蒋多, 何贵兵(2017). 心理距离视角下的行为决策. 心理科学进展, 25(11), 1992-2001.
[9]	刘红艳, 李爱梅, 王海忠, 等(2012). 不同促销方式对产品购买决策的影响——基于解释水平理论视角的研究. 心理学报, 44(8), 1100-1113.
[10]	陶安琪, 刘金平, 冯廷勇(2015). 时间洞察力对跨期选择偏好的预测. 心理科学, 38(2), 279-283.
[11]	王灿, 曹建, 佘升翔, 孙彦(2017). 行为科学视角的饮食决策及影响因素. 人类工效学, 23(5), 75-80.
[12]	王珂(2017). 回忆“过去自我”与想象“未来自我”对跨期选择的影响及其认知机制. 重庆: 西南大学.
[13]	颜志龙, 郑中平(2016). 傻瓜也会跑统计. 台北: 五南图书出版社.
[14]	钟毅平, 李琎, 王潇(2017). 时间洞察力特质对食品选择偏好的影响: 解释水平对内隐偏好的作用. 心理科学, 40(5), 1161-1167.
[15]	周圆圆, 陈瑞, 郑毓煌(2017). 重口味食物会使人变胖?——咸味对食物热量感知的影响. 心理学报, 49(4), 513-525.
[16]	Blouin-Hudon, E. M. C., & Pychyl, T. A. (2016). A Mental Imagery Intervention to Increase Future Self-Continuity and Reduce Procrastination. Applied Psychology, 66, 326-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12088
[17]	Carels, R., & Konrad, K. J. (2007). Individual Differences in Food Perceptions and Calorie Estimation: An Examination of Dieting Status, Weight, and Gender. Appetite, 49, 450-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.009
[18]	Daniel, T. O., Stanton, C. M., & Epstein, L. H. (2013). The Future Is Now: Reducing Impulsivity and Energy Intake Using Episodic Future Thinking. Psychological Science, 24, 2339-2342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613488780
[19]	Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2003). The Effects of a Brief Time Perspective Intervention for Increasing Physical Activity among Young Adults. Psychology & Health, 18, 685-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044031000110447
[20]	Henderson, M. D., Trope, Y., & Carnevale, P. J. (2006). Negotiation from a Near and Distant Time Perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 91, 712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.712
[21]	Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing Psychological Distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001
[22]	Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
[23]	Luo, Y. M., Jackson, T., Wang, X. G., & Huang, X. T. (2013). Neural Correlates of Self-Appraisals in the Near and Distant Future: An Event-Related Potential Study. PLoS ONE, 8, e84332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084332
[24]	Parfit, D. (1971). Personal Identity. Philosophical Review, 80, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184309
[25]	Read, D., & van Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2803
[26]	Rutchick, A. M., Slepian, M. L., Reyes, M. O., Pleskus, L. N., & Hershfield, H. E. (2018). Future Self-Continuity Is Associated with Improved Health and Increases Exercise Behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000153
[27]	Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[28]	Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
[29]	Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
[30]	Wakslak, C. J., Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Representations of the Self in the Near and Distant Future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012939
[31]	Wansink, B., & Hanks, A. S. (2013). Slim by Design: Serving Healthy Foods First in Buffet Lines Improves Overall Meal Selection. PLoS ONE, 8, e77055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077055
[32]	Weijzen, P. L., De, G. C., & Dijksterhuis, G. B. (2008). Discrepancy between Snack Choice Intentions and Behavior. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40, 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2007.08.003

Full-Text