不同任务难度下大学生社会支持度对冲突适应能力的影响
Effects of Social Support on Conflict Adaptation Ability of College Students under Different Task Difficulties

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.95117, PP. 955-961

Keywords: 社会支持，冲突适应效应，Flanker范式，Simon范式
Social Support, Conflict Adaptation Effect, Flanker Paradigm, Simon Paradigm

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究主要探究大学生群体的社会支持程度对其冲突适应能力的影响，明确了大学生的社会支持度与冲突适应能力的关系能使我们更好的适应冲突与环境，具有重要的研究价值。本课题设计了实验一与实验二来研究来自于环境中不同任务难度条件下大学生社会支持度对冲突适应能力的影响，实验一采用经典的Flanker任务探究在简单冲突情况下社会支持度与冲突适应能力的关系，实验二采用Flanker和Simon任务的交叉整合任务探究在复杂冲突情况下社会支持度与冲突适应能力的关系。对得到的结果进行多因素方差分析，研究结果发现社会支持度在简单情境下主效应不显著，冲突适应效应显著；社会支持度在复杂情境下主效应不显著，但客观支持分维度主效应显著，客观支持度较高的个体在Simon任务中冲突适应能力显著高于客观支持度较低的个体，在Flanker任务中边缘显著。研究表明客观支持度较高的个体，对于复杂的认知环境冲突具有更好的适应能力，因此在生活中应当注重个人客观支持网络的建立和维护。
This study mainly explores the impact of social support of college students on their conflict adaptation ability, and clarifies the relationship between social support and conflict adaptation ability of college students, so that we can better adapt to conflict and environment, which has important research value. Experiments 1 and 2 were designed to study the impact of social support on conflict adaptation ability of College Students under different task difficulty conditions. Experiment 1 used classical Flanker tasks to explore the relationship between social support and conflict adaptation ability in simple conflict situations. Experiment 2 used Flanker and Simon tasks to explore the relationship between social support and conflict adaptation ability in complex conflict situations. The relationship between social support and conflict adaptability. The results were analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance. The results show that the main effect of social support is not significant in simple situations, and the conflict adaptation effect is significant; the main effect of social support is not significant in complex situations, but the subjective effect of objective support is significant in sub-dimension. Individuals with higher objective support have significantly higher conflict adaptation ability than those with lower objective support in Simon task, and are marginally significant in Flanker task. Research shows that individuals with higher objective support have better adaptability to complex cognitive environment conflicts, so we should pay attention to the establishment and maintenance of personal objective support network in life.

References

[1]	包文婷(2016). 大学新生社会支持与学校适应的关系研究. 卫生职业教育, 34(16), 113-115.
[2]	陈雪峰, 时勘(2008). 孤独感与领悟社会支持对大学生心理健康的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(5), 534-536.
[3]	何丹(2014). 不同任务条件下冲突适应效应的年龄差异. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 陕西师范大学.
[4]	蒋军, 向玲, 张庆林, 陈安涛(2014). 冲突适应独立于意识: 来自行为和ERP的证据. 心理学报, 46(5), 581-592.
[5]	李永鑫, 朱湘茹, 李莉(2012). 6-12岁儿童Flanker任务下的冲突适应效应. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 576-580.
[6]	刘培朵, 杨文静, 田夏, 陈安涛(2012). 冲突适应效应研究述评. 心理科学进展, 20(4), 532-541.
[7]	宋晓蕾, 李小芳, 赵媛, 何丹(2017). 不同任务难度条件下认知老化对冲突适应能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 569-576.
[8]	唐丹丹, 陈安涛(2013). 冲突适应的神经振荡机制. 中国科学: 生命科学, 43(11), 992-1002.
[9]	王兵(2018). 消极情绪对冲突适应效应的影响. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 东北师范大学.
[10]	王大华, 黄一帆, 彭华茂, 陈晓敏(2012). 老年人加工速度的干预研究. 心理学报, 44(4), 469-477.
[11]	王婷(2016). 冲突适应效应个体差异的神经机制研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[12]	严标宾, 郑雪, 邱林(2003). 社会支持对大学生主观幸福感的影响. 应用心理学, 9(4), 22-28.
[13]	于丹丹, 赵海楠(2018). 大学生社会支持与学习倦怠的关系. 校园心理, 16(6), 427-430.
[14]	Aisenberg, D., Cohen, N., Pick, H., Tressman, I., Rappaport, M., Shenberg, T., & Henik, A. (2015). Social Priming Improves Cognitive Control in Elderly Adults-Evidence from the Simon Task. PLoS ONE, 10, e0117151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117151
[15]	Cohen, M. X., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2011). Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00030
[16]	Cohen, M. X., & Gaal, S. V. (2013). Dynamic Interactions between Large-Scale Brain Networks Predict Behavioral Adaptation after Perceptual Errors. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1061-1072. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs069
[17]	Gratton, G., Coled, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the Use of Information: Strategic Control of Activation of Responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 21, 480-506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
[18]	Guay, F., Senecal, C., & Gauthier, L. (2003). Role Conflict and Academic Procrastination: A Self-Determination Perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.144
[19]	Jiang, J., Xiang, L., Zhang, Q., & Chen, A. (2014). Conflict Adaptation Is Independent of Consciousness: Behavioral and ERP Evidence. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 581-592. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00581
[20]	Kim, C., Johnson, N. F., & Gold, B. T. (2014). Conflict Adaptation in Prefrontal Cortex: Now You See It, Now You Don’t. Cortex, 50, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.011
[21]	Li, Q., Wang, K., Nan, W., Zheng, Y., Wu, H., Wang, H., & Liu, X. (2015). Electrophysiological Dynamics Reveal Distinct Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts. Psycho-Physiology, 52, 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12382
[22]	Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Function. Neuron, 79, 217-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007

Full-Text