|
城市绿色生态系统休憩娱乐服务支付意愿及价值评估——以武汉市汉阳区为例
|
Abstract:
以武汉市汉阳区为例,采用CVM调查,利用二元Logistic模型、有序Ordinal模型分析居民对汉阳区城市生态系统休憩娱乐服务的支付意愿与影响因素,并对其价值进行评估。结果表明:1) 收入水平对支付意愿和支付金额有显著正影响,随着收入水平的提高,支付意愿加强,支付金额增加。支付意愿和支付金额还与受访者对汉阳区城市绿色生态系统的满意程度呈正相关。受访者常住地对支付意愿呈显著负影响;2) 受访者对汉阳区绿色生态系统有较高支付意愿,其中有正支付意愿的占比76.9%,不愿支付的主要原因“应由政府出资”占比35.5%;受访者年龄、月均收入和再次游憩对支付意愿有显著负影响;3) 通过CVM估算得其休憩娱乐服务经济价值为10.59~13.77亿元。
Taking Hanyang district of Wuhan city as an example, the residents’ willingness to pay for the en-tertainment service of the urban green ecosystem and its affecting factors were analyzed using the CVM survey, Logistic and Ordinal models and Spearman correlation coefficient. The results showed that: 1) Income level had a significant positive impact on residents’ payment behavior. The probability and amount of the residents’ WTP were increased by their improving income. WTP and the amount of payment were also positively correlated with respondents’ satisfaction with the urban green ecosystem in Hanyang district. Respondents’ permanent residence has a significantly negative impact on their willingness to pay; 2) Respondents have a high WTP for the green ecosystem in Hanyang district, among which 76.9% have a positive willingness to pay, and the main reason for the reluctance to pay is that 35.5% was “government funded”; 3) According to the CVM, the estimated economic value of the recreation services is 1.059 - 1.377 billion yuan.
[1] | 宗跃光, 徐宏彦, 汤艳冰, 陈红春. 城市生态系统服务功能的价值结构分析[J]. 城市环境与城市生态, 1999, 12(4): 19-22. |
[2] | Davis, R.K. (1963) Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem. Natural Resources Journal, 3, 239-249. |
[3] | 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 454-463. |
[4] | 赵天瑶, 曹鹏, 刘章勇, 蒋哲, 金涛. 基于CVM的荆州市稻田生态系统的景观休闲旅游价值评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(3): 498-503. |
[5] | 蒋劭妍, 曹牧, 汤臣栋, 马强, 曹莹, 薛建辉. 基于CVM的崇明东滩湿地非使用价值评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1): 21-27. |
[6] | 崔峰, 丁风芹, 何杨, 杜林华, 颜廷凯. 城市公园游憩资源非使用价值评估——以南京市玄武湖公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(10): 1988-1996. |
[7] | 张丽云, 江波, 甄泉, 欧阳志云. 洞庭湖生态系统非使用价值评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14(6): 854-859. |
[8] | Spash, C.L. (2006) Non-Economic Moti-vation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness to Pay for Environmental Improvements. Land Economics, 82, 602-622. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.82.4.602 |
[9] | Santos, A.C., Roberts, J.A., Barreto, M.L. and Cairncross, S. (2011) Demand for Sanitation in Salvador, Brazil: A Hybrid Choice Approach. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1325-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.018 |
[10] | Basili, M., Di Matteo, M. and Ferrini, S. (2004) An-alysing Demand for Environmental Quality: A Willingness to Pay/Accept Study in the Province of Siena (Italy). Waste Management, 26, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.027 |
[11] | 敖长林, 陈瑾婷, 焦扬, 王静. 生态保护价值的距离衰减性: 以三江平原湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(16): 5109-5117. |
[12] | Hanemann, W.M. (1999) The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA. In: Bateman, I.J. and Willis, K.G., Eds., Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, New York, 42-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248915.003.0003 |
[13] | 何可, 张俊飚, 丰军辉. 基于条件价值评估法(CVM)的农业废弃物污染防控非市场价值研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(2): 213-219. |
[14] | 郑海霞, 张陆彪, 涂勤. 金华江流域生态服务补偿支付意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(4): 761-767. |