|
|
大佳河保护区挠力河流域浮游植物功能群季节演替特征
|
Abstract:
为了研究大佳河自然保护区挠力河流域浮游植物功能群季节演替特征及其影响因子，分别于2018年春季(5月)、夏季(7月)和秋季(10月)对挠力河流域设置的6个采样点进行浮游植物采样分析，共鉴定出浮游植物8门140种，划分为21个功能群，分别为L0、K、Tc、H1、M、P、D、C、MP、N、X3、E、T、Y、W1、W2、LM、X1、X2、J、F，其中重要功能群有8个，分别为L0、W0、D、MP、T、Y、W1、X2。挠力河浮游植物功能群季节变化呈现为D + Y → Tc + W1 → MP + Y的变化特征。运用典范对应分析(CCA)探究浮游植物功能群与环境因子间的关系，结果表明，挠力河浮游植物功能群受水环境因子影响较为显著，其中，pH、总磷(TP)、透明度(SD)、浊度(Tur)是影响浮游植物功能群分布的主要环境因子。
In order to study the seasonal succession characteristics and influencing factors of Phytoplankton functional groups in the Naoli River of Dajiahe Nature Reserve. Phytoplankton sampling analysis was performed on six sampling points separately in spring (May), summer (July) and autumn (October) of 2018. 140 species of 8 Phylum Phytoplankton were identified totally and divided into 21 functional groups, including L0, Tc, H1, M, P, K, D, C, MP, N, X3, E, T, Y, W1, W2, LM, X1, X2, F and J. Eight of them were important functional groups: L0, W0, D, MP, T, Y, W1, and X2. The seasonal variation of the Phytoplankton functional group in the Naoli River is characterized by D + Y → Tc + W1 → MP + Y. Relationship between Phytoplankton functional groups and environmental factors was explored by using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA), the results showed that the Phytoplankton functional groups in the Naoli River were significantly affected by environmental factors, among them, pH, total PhosPhorus (TP), transparency (SD) and turbidity (Tur) were the main factors affecting the distribution of Phytoplankton functional groups.
| [1] | 王帅帅, 王博涵, 韩洁, 等. 济南南部山区夏季水域浮游植物功能群分析[J]. 河北渔业, 2017(5): 24-25+30. |
| [2] | 钱烁统, 刘凌, 陈宁, 等. 河生藻类形态功能群分布及其与环境因子关系的分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2018, 36(6): 146-149. |
| [3] | Reynolds, C.S., Huszar, V., Kruk, C., et al. (2002) Towards a Functional Classification of the Freshwater Phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/24.5.417 |
| [4] | Padisak, J., Crossetti, L.O. and Naselli-Flores, L. (2009) Use and Misuse in the Application of the Phytoplankton Functional Classification: A Critical Review with Updates. Hydrobiologia, 621, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9645-0 |
| [5] | 胡忠军, 莫丹玫, 周小玉, 等. 千岛湖浮游植物群落结构时空分布及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2017, 38(5): 46-54. |
| [6] | Devercelli, M. and O’Farrell, I. (2013) Factors Affecting the Structure and Maintenance of Phytoplankton Func-tional Groups in a Nutrient Rich Lowland River. Limnologica, 43, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2012.05.001 |
| [7] | Santana, L.M., Crossetti, L.O. and Ferragut, C. (2017) Ecological Status Assessment of Tropical Reservoirs through the Assemblage Index of Phytoplankton Functional Groups. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 40, 695-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-017-0373-4 |
| [8] | 君珊, 王东波, 周健华, 等. 拉萨河流域浮游植物群落结构特征及与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 34-45. |
| [9] | 向蓉, 李巧玉, 喻燚, 等. 汝溪河浮游硅藻功能群特征及其与环境因子相关性分析[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(8): 3290-3301. |
| [10] | 王建华, 田景汉, 吕宪国. 挠力河流域河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 30(2): 481-486. |
| [11] | 侯伟, 张树文, 张养贞, 等. 三江平原挠力河流域50年代以来湿地退缩过程及驱动力分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(6): 725-731. |
| [12] | 汪梦琪, 汪金成, 王琪, 等. 洞庭湖区平水期浮游生物群落结构特征及富营养化现状[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 301(8): 193-204. |
| [13] | 胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006. |
| [14] | 国家环保局本书编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1989. |
| [15] | 武安泉, 郭宁, 覃雪波. 寒区典型湿地浮游植物功能群季节变化及其与环境因子关系[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(5): 1341-1349. |
| [16] | 陆欣鑫, 刘妍, 范亚文. 呼兰河湿地夏、秋两季浮游植物功能分组演替及其驱动因子[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(5): 1264-1273. |
| [17] | 范小晨, 代存芳, 陆欣鑫, 等. 金河湾城市湿地浮游植物功能类群演替及驱动因子[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16): 5726-5738. |
| [18] | 安睿, 王凤友, 于洪贤, 等. 小兴凯湖浮游植物功能群特征及其影响因子[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(7): 985-994. |
| [19] | 闵文武, 王培培, 李丽娟, 等. 渭河流域浮游植物功能群与环境因子的关系[J]. 环境科学研究, 2015, 28(9): 1397-1406. |
| [20] | 葛蔚, 汪芳, 柴超. 氮和磷浓度对中肋骨条藻和锥状斯氏藻种间竞争的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(7): 697-704. |
| [21] | 陈倩, 李秋华, 胡月敏, 等. 贵州百花水库浮游藻类功能群时空分布特征及影响因子分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(7): 1266-1274. |
| [22] | 郑诚, 陆开宏, 徐镇, 等. 四明湖水库浮游植物功能类群的季节演替及其影响因子[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(6): 2688-2697. |
