黏土–粉土地基掏挖基础抗拔试验研究
Experimental Study on Uplift Behavior of Excavation Foundations in Clay-Silt Foundation

DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2019.87142, PP. 1220-1228

Keywords: 黏土–粉土地基，掏挖基础，承载特性，极限承载力，破坏模式
Clay-Silt Foundation, Excavation Foundations, Bearing Characteristics, Ultimate Bearing Capacity, Failure Mode

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

杆塔基础是架空输电线路的重要组成部分，主要承受上拔、下压和水平荷载，其中抗拔荷载是评价杆塔基础承载性能的主要因素，因此开展了分层地基中杆塔基础抗拔承载性能的现场试验研究。本文根据3个掏挖基础的基顶上拔荷载位移曲线和基础周围土体裂缝的开展，分析了黏土–粉土地基掏挖基础基顶荷载位移曲线特性、极限承载力取值和地基破坏模式。结果表明：基础的荷载位移曲线为缓变型，基础埋深增大，其抵抗变形的能力越强；掏挖基础极限承载力及其对应位移的取值方法按大小排序为L1-L2法 > 规范法 > 双直线交点法 > 初始直线斜率法，其中规范法最适合掏挖基础的极限承载力取值；随着基础埋深增加，基础地表宏观裂缝的影响范围先减小后趋于稳定，剖面宏观裂缝的延伸深度逐渐减小，基础的破坏模式为整体破坏。
The transmission tower foundation is an important part of the overhead transmission line, which is mainly subjected to uplift, compressive and horizontal loads. Uplift load is the main factor to evaluate the bearing performance of the tower foundation. Therefore, the tower foundation test on uplift bearing capacity in the layered foundation is carried out. The uplift load-displacement curves of three excavation foundations and the cracks of soil around the foundation are obtained. The load-displacement curve characteristics, ultimate bearing capacity and failure mode of the foundation in clay-silt foundation are analyzed. For the foundation top plane, the load-displacement curve develops slowly. The greater the depth of the foundation in the clay-silt foundation, the stronger its ability to resist deformation. The method of the ultimate bearing capacity of the excavation foundation and its corresponding displacement is sorted, L1-L2 method > norm method > tangent intersection method > slope tangent method. The norm method is most suitable for the ultimate bearing capacity of the excavation foundation. As the foundation depth increases, the influence range of the macroscopic crack on the foundation surface first decreases and then stabilizes; the depth of the macroscopic crack gradually decreases; the failure mode of the excavation foundation is overall failure.

References

[1]	Nazir, R., Moayedi, H., Pratikso, A., et al. (2015) The Uplift Load Capacity of an Enlarged Base Pier Embedded in Dry Sand. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8, 7285-7296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1721-3
[2]	Dickin, E.A. and Leung, C.F. (1992) The Influence of Foundation Geometry on the Uplift Behaviour of Piles with Enlarged Bases. Canadian Geotechinnical Journal, 29, 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-054
[3]	Dickin, E.A. and Leung, C.F. (1990) Performance of Piles with Enlarged Bases Subject to Uplift Forces. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27, 546-556. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-070
[4]	Chae, D. and Cho, W. (2012) Uplift Capacity of Belled Pile in Weathered Sandstones. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 22, 297-305.
[5]	崔强, 周亚辉, 童瑞明, 等. 上拔扩底基础与地基土体承载特性差异性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(A2): 476-482.
[6]	赵瑜, 靳彩, 胡志远, 等. 湿陷性黄土地区送电线路铁塔掏挖式基础试验研究[J] 华北水利水电学院学报, 2001, 22(2): 1-6.
[7]	乾增珍, 鲁先龙, 童瑞铭. 上拔水平力组合荷载作用下混凝土扩展基础承载性能试验[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2012, 32(5): 573-578.3.
[8]	刘文白, 周健. 扩底桩的上拔试验及其颗粒流数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(A2): 201-206.
[9]	鲁先龙, 乾增珍, 童瑞铭, 等. 戈壁地基扩底掏挖基础抗拔试验及其位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(7): 1871-1877.
[10]	中华人名共和国住房与城乡建设部. JGJ106-2014. 建筑基桩检测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
[11]	鲁先龙, 程永锋, 包永忠, 等. 杆塔掏挖基础抗拔研究进展及其设计规范的修订[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(10): 53-59.
[12]	国家能源局. DL/T5219-2014. 架空输电线路基础设计技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2005.
[13]	鲁先龙, 乾增珍, 崔强. 黄土地基掏挖扩底基础抗拔实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(3): 647-652.
[14]	Majer, J. (1955) Zur berechnung von zugfundamenten. Ostereichische Bauzeitschrift, 10, 85-90.
[15]	Murray, E.J. and Geddes, J.D. (1987) Uplift of Anchor Plates in Sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 113, 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:3(202)
[16]	Meyerhof, G.G. and Adams, J.I. (1968) The Ultimate Uplift Capacity of Foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 5, 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1139/t68-024
[17]	黄茂松, 王向军, 吴江斌, 等. 不同桩长扩底抗拔桩极限承载力的统一计算模式[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(1): 63-69.

Full-Text