全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

几种新型除臭剂对氨气去除效果的比较研究
Comparative Study on Ammonia Removal Effect of Several New Deodorants

DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2019.95085, PP. 634-641

Keywords: 微生物除臭,和润,氨气,丰度
Microbial Deodorant
, Herun, Ammonia, Abundance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨几种新型除臭剂对氨气去除效果及机制,以期为除臭剂的推广使用提供参考依据。方法:向充满氨气的密封装置内分别喷洒三种除臭剂,用氨气检测仪持续监测装置内氨气的浓度变化。比较三种除臭剂的除臭效果,采用高通量测序技术对三种菌剂进行测序,比较各组菌群的多样性及丰度。结果:3种除臭剂对氨气的去除效率由高到低依次为和润产品3 (hr3)、和润产品2 (hr2)、和润产品1 (hr1);hr1的物种数量最多,物种多样性最高;hr2的物种数量最少,物种多样性最低;hr3居中;hr3菌群中厚壁菌门的乳杆菌属含量较高。结论:和润公司提供的三种除臭剂均能高效的去除氨气,以hr3的除臭效率最高;hr3除臭效率高的可能原因是乳杆菌属含量较高。
Objective: To investigate the effect and mechanism of several new deodorants on ammonia removal, in order to provide reference for the promotion and use of deodorant. Method: Three kinds of deo-dorizers were sprayed into the sealed device which is filled with ammonia gas, and the ammonia gas concentration in the device was continuously monitored by the ammonia gas detector. Comparing the deodorizing effects of three kinds of deodorants, three kinds of microbial agents were sequenced by high-throughput sequencing technology, and the diversity and abundance of each group were compared. Results: The removal efficiency of ammonia from three deodorants was from Herun 3 (hr3), Herun 2 (hr2), and Herun 1 (hr1); hr1 has the largest number of species and the highest species diversity. hr2 has the lowest number of species and the lowest species diversity. hr3 is in the middle. The content of lactobacillus in firmicutes was higher in hr3. Conclusion: The three deodorants provided by herun company can remove ammonia gas efficiently, and hr3 has the highest deodorization efficiency. The possible reason for hr3’s high deodorization efficiency is the high content of lactobacillus.

References

[1]  李万江. 环卫工程中除臭技术的研究分析[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2017(2): 11+14.
[2]  吕荣谋. 生活垃圾处理设施恶臭治理工艺分析[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(3): 103-105.
[3]  王帅丹. 生物除臭菌株的筛选及其在臭气处理中的应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2016.
[4]  朱春红, 章双杰, 陶志云, 等. 禽舍内氨气产生、危害及其有效减排措施[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2019, 40(6): 72-77.
[5]  Stokstad, E. (2014) Air Pollution Ammonia Pollution from Farming May Exact Hefty Health Costs. Science, 343, 238-258.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.343.6168.238
[6]  贾华清. 畜禽粪便的除臭技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007, 13(5): 49-51.
[7]  单婕, 邵孝侯. 有效微生物与调理剂在奶牛粪堆肥中的保氮与除臭效应[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(2): 646-648+650.
[8]  简保权, 朱舒平, 邓昌彦, 等. 猪粪堆肥过程中NH3和H2S的释放及除臭微生物的筛选研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006(S2): 183-186.
[9]  Grice, E.A., Kong, H.H., Sean, C., et al. (2009) Topographical and Temporal Diversity of the Human Skin Microbiome. Science, 324, 1190-1192.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171700
[10]  宋瑞霖. 关于污水处理厂除臭技术几种方法效果的比较[J]. 科技视界, 2016(17): 209-211.
[11]  曾苏, 李南华, 贺琨, 等. 垃圾微生物除臭剂的筛选、复配及其培养条件的优化[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2015, 35(2): 72-77.
[12]  杜元军, 邱慧玲, 朱连勤, 等. 鼠李糖乳杆菌对氨处理效果的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(14): 157-160.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133