|
Nursing Science 2020
非联网医联体门诊转诊入院服务流程再造与应用
|
Abstract:
目的:探索非联网医联体转诊入院服务系统再造与应用的效率性、安全性,满足非联网医联体门诊患者的不同转诊住院需求。方法:建立系统自动转诊及人工换证转诊的流程实施及管理模式,实现不同类别、不同途径的门诊住院转诊的远程签床需求;比较项目实施前后转诊住院患者二次就诊变化以及相应的诊疗费用支出变化;分析统计项目实施前后年度经不同流程实施的转诊结果变化以及远程签床的时效管控效果。结果:项目实施前后经急诊年度下转门诊入院人次占年度总入院人次的21.5%和3.5% (P < 0.01);项目实施前后经急诊转诊占用急诊床日数分别为1232.5天和158.9天(P < 0.01);二次就诊花费分别为422,404.5元和89,754.0元(P < 0.01)。项目实施后远程签床有效率达87.8%。结论:该非联网医联体转诊入院服务流程能较好地保证转诊住院的医疗机构患者的有序流动、减少因二次就诊产生的相关医疗费用,更好地保证等待入院患者的及时住院就医、提高转诊入院患者就医体验,提高医院急诊及住院医疗资源的利用度、较有效地提高转诊入院服务效率。
Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of reconstruction and application for the transfer treatment system in non-networked hospital health alliance, and to meet the needs of different referral hospital of outpatients in non-networked hospital health alliance. Methods: The implementation and management modes of systemic automobile transfer and manual transfer treatment were established in order to meet the requirements of remote admission for outpatients’ referrals of various types and routes. The changes of two visits of inpatients before and after the implementation of the project and the clinical costs of medical treatment were compared. The changes in transfer treatment performed by different processes before and after the project and the effect of time-limited control were analyzed. Results: The proportions of hospital admissions from the emergency department to outpatient department before and after the project implementation were 21.5% and 3.5% in all inpatients per year, respectively (P < 0.01). The duration of using the emergency bed for emergent referral was 1232.5 days and 158.9 days before and after the project, respectively (P < 0.01). The cost of twice visits was 422,405.5 yuan and 89,754.0 yuan, respectively (P < 0.01). The effective rate of remote bed signing was 87.8% after the implementation of the project. Conclusion: The non-networked hospital health alliance transfer treatment service process could ensure the flow of patients orderly, and reduce the related medical expenses caused by twice hospital visits. Meanwhile, the process could ensure the timely hospitalization for waiting outpatients, and improve the medical experience, the utilization of hospital emergency and medical resources, and the referral and admission effectively.
[1] | 孙喜琢, 宫芳芳, 顾晓东. 基于远程区域医疗联合体的时间与探索[J]. 现代医院管理, 2013, 6(11): 8-10. |
[2] | 林闽刚, 张瑞利. 医疗服务体系的纵向整合模式及其选择[J]. 苏州大学学报, 2014, 35(4): 15-20. |
[3] | 蒋璐, 刘凯, 钟彦, 等. 全面托管模式下某新建医院医疗质量管理的探索[J]. 华西医学, 2016, 31(9): 1602-1605. |
[4] | 钟艳宇, 陈娟. 我国医联体钟双向转诊制度的实施现状及对策[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(16): 154-158. |
[5] | 李济宁, 周斌, 史戈, 等. 双向转诊支持平台研究[J]. 中国医院, 2015, 19(8): 48-49. |
[6] | 程南生, 刘姿, 饶莉, 等. 开展双向转诊改善门诊服务[J]. 中国医院, 2016, 20(4): 4-5. |
[7] | 吴文强, 冯杰. 社区医院与大中型医院双向转诊的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2015, 32(12): 892-895. |
[8] | 胡琳. 余江. 李军, 等. 全信息化入院服务新模式的设计与实现[J]. 中国医院管理, 2017, 37(3): 47-48. |
[9] | 沈蔺. 深化医改背景下的入院一体化流程再造[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2017, 20(10): 88-89. |
[10] | 张振建, 胡必富. “一院多区”的管理困惑与对策[J]. 现代医院管, 2015, 13(3): 38-39. |
[11] | 高阔, 甘晓青. 我国患者双向转诊行为决策及影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18(28): 3393-3395. |
[12] | 张瑞利. 双向转诊制度实现路径: 体系完善和机制创新[J]. 价值工程, 2013(28): 260-261. |
[13] | 李勇, 修燕, 王萌, 等. 联网互动整合医学体系的初步实践与思考[J]. 中国医院, 2015, 19(5): 51-53. |
[14] | 姚哼, 汉业旭, 马志娟, 等. 区域医疗联合体中核心医院的作用及实践探讨[J]. 中国医院, 2015, 19(5): 46-48. |
[15] | 孙喜琢, 宫芳芳, 顾晓东, 等. 基于远程区域医疗联合体的实践与探索[J]. 现代医院管理, 2013, 11(3): 8-10. |
[16] | 许朝晖, 徐卫国. 试论建立以医保总量为纽带的医疗联合体[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2011, 30(9): 54-56. |