全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Finance  2019 

租赁资产证券化定价影响因素实证研究
An Empirical Study on Factors Influencing the Pricing of Securitization of Leasing Assets

DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2019.96066, PP. 595-602

Keywords: 融资租赁,资产证券化,风险溢价,定价模型
Financial Leasing
, Asset Securitization, Risk Premium, Pricing Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着国家扶持政策的开展,我国的租赁行业发展迅速,但目前行业基础设施仍然处于建设阶段,融资受限、成本偏高的问题仍未解决。随着金融的深化改革与经济调整,租赁资产证券化的优势日益显著,而利率定价是资产证券化过程中的核心环节,对产品价值的考量对租赁资产证券化参与各方对于风险溢价的把控及投资决策至关重要。本文应用基于无风险套利的资产证券化产品定价模型,分析了企业间ABS市场产品价格形成的内在机制,实证结果表明债项评级与国债利率对定价机制的影响尤为显著。基于此提出政府应健全对信息披露和交易流程的法律法规,设立专职监管机构,防止定价失真等对策建议。
With the development of national support policies, China’s leasing industry has developed rapidly, but at present the industry infrastructure is still in the construction stage, financing is limited, the high cost of the problem is still not solved. With the deepening of financial reform and economic adjustment, the advantages of securitization of leasing assets are increasingly significant, and in-terest rate pricing is the core link in the process of securitization of assets. The consideration of product value is crucial to the control of risk premium and investment decision of all parties in-volved in securitization of leasing assets. In this paper, the pricing model of asset securitization products based on risk-free arbitrage is applied to analyze the internal mechanism of product price formation in ABS market in enterprises. The empirical results show that the impact of debt rating and interest rate on the pricing mechanism is particularly significant. Based on this, the paper proposes that the government should perfect the laws and regulations on information disclosure and transaction process, set up a full-time regulatory agency, and prevent the distortion of pricing.


References

[1]  Van Landschoot, A. (2004) Determinants of Euro Term Structure of Credit Spreads. Working Paper Research, 132, 1303-1315.
[2]  Jiang, J.X. (2008) Beating Earnings Benchmarks and the Cost of Debt. Accounting Review, 83, 377-416.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.377
[3]  Guo, L. (2013) Determinants of Credit Spreads: The Role of Ambiguity and Information Uncertainty. North American Journal of Economics & Finance, 24, 279-297.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2012.10.003
[4]  Mason, J.R. and Rosner, J. (2007) Where Did the Risk Go? How Mi-sapplied Bond Ratings Cause Mortgage Backed Securities and Collateralized Debt Obligation Market Disruption. SSM Elec-tronic Journal, 125, 217-224.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1027475
[5]  Vink, D. and Thibeault, A.E. (2008) ABS, MBS and CDO Compared: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Structured Finance, 14, 27-45.
https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2008.709954
[6]  Ashcraft, B., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and Vickery, J.I. (2010) MBS Ratings and the Mortgage Credit Boom. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1-59.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1615613
[7]  Fabozzi, F.J. and Vink, D. (2012) Looking Beyond Credit Ratings: Factors Investors Consider in Pricing European Asset-Backed Securities. European Financial Management, 18, 515-542.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00577.x
[8]  王少波. 资产证券化信用评级: 国外模型方法及其借鉴化[J]. 当代经济科学, 2007, 29(6): 37-44.
[9]  沈红波, 廖冠民. 信用评级机构可以提供增量信息吗——基于短期融资券的实证检验[J]. 财贸经济, 2014, 35(8): 62-70.
[10]  侯颖哲, 憂颖. 我国资产证券化过程中信用评级问题的研究的[J]. 现代商业, 2015(23): 246-247.
[11]  韩鹏飞, 胡奕明. 债券增信定价的实证研究——来自中国债券市场的经验证据[J]. 投资研究, 2015, 34(2): 90-111.
[12]  王芳, 周红. 担保方式效应与独立审计需求——基于中国债券市场的研究[J]. 会计研究, 2015(7): 71-78.
[13]  钱梦佳. 我国租赁资产证券化及其定价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海社会科学院, 2016.
[14]  刘曦腾, 杨大楷. 我国资产证券化产品发行利率影响因素的实证分析基于ABS和CLO信用利差差异的比较[J]. 东岳论丛, 2016, 37(11): 162-168.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133