In China, the reform of the system of lifelong responsibility for the quality of handling cases and the system of accountability for wrongful cases, which requires “whoever handles cases shall be responsible and whoever breaks the law shall bear the responsibility”, has been highly expected by all sectors of society. Misjudged criminal cases are the psychological “high-tension line” and “primary source of pressure” of many prosecutors and judges. In the investigation of wrongful cases, some prosecutors and judges exposed serious psychological problems and did not get professional and standard psychological counseling and correction. At present, we should perfect the Chinese wrongful case accountability model with the concept of due process, construct the psychological support and service system, and make clear the characteristic principle and application system of psychological counseling.
References
[1]
Burton, W. C. (1980). Legal Thesaurus (p. 333). London: Macmillan Publishing Press.
[2]
Fan, C., & Liu, W. (2015). Objectivity and Rationality: The Concept Construction of Criminal Wrongful Case Accountability System. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 4, 19-26.
[3]
Jia, Y. (2005). She Xianglin Case Involved in the Police Suicide: Writing Blood before Death Propaganda. Southern Metropolis Daily.
[4]
Petero, J., & Petero, N. (2012). How Unjust Cases Happen: Eight Judicial Superstitions That Lead to Unjust, False and Wrong Cases (p. 134). Beijing: Peking University Press.
[5]
Rawls, J. (1988). A Theory of Justice (p. 86 Trans. He Huaihong et al.). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
[6]
Shen, D. (2013). How Should We Prevent Unjust, False and Wrong Cases? People’s Court Daily.
[7]
Xi, W., & Lei, X. (2019) Current Situation, Problems and Improving Ways: The Reform of Evaluation Index System for Criminal Justice of Chinese Courts. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 10, 91-98.
[8]
Yan, R. (2004). Judge Impeachment and Judicial Punishment under the Constitution of the United States. Law Journal, 7.
[9]
Zimmerman Isaiah, M. (2006). Helping Judges in Distress. Judicature, 1, 10-15.
