全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
投递稿件

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Text and Data Mining in Directive 2019/790/EU Enhancing Web-Harvesting and Web-Archiving in Libraries and Archives

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2019.93024, PP. 369-395

Keywords: Libraries, Archives, Web Harvesting, Web Archiving, Data Analysis, Text & Data Mining, TDM, Text Mining

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Text and Data Mining (hereinafter, TDM) issue for the purpose of scientific research or for any other purpose which is included in the provisions of the new EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (hereinafter, DSM). TDM is a term that includes Web harvesting and Web Archiving activities. Web harvesting and archiving pertains to the processes of collecting from the web and archiving of works that reside on the Web. Web harvesting and archiving is one of the most attractive applications for libraries which plan ahead for their future operation. When works retrieved from the Web are turned into archived and documented material to be found in a library, the amount of works that can be found in said library can be far greater than the number of works harvested from the Web. This paper aims at presenting certain issues related to the existing legal framework as well as technical/librarianship issues that apply to TDM which includes Web harvesting and archiving activities. This paper elaborates upon the applicable new provisions of Directive 2019/ 790/EU on Copyright in the DSM with the aim to shed light upon issues such as the notion of “lawful access”, the beneficiary of the mandatory exception for TDM, the purpose-specific TDM described in art.3 of the new Directive on Copyright in the DSM, and the application of the “three-step test” in TDM.

 References

[1]  Bergman, C., Hunter, L., & Rzhetsky, A. (2013). Announcing the PLOS Text Mining Collection.
https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2013/04/17/announcing-the-plos-text-mining-collection/
[2]  Case C-203/02 (2004). The British Horseracing Board Ltd and Others v. William Hill Organization Ltd.
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-203/02
[3]  Case C-30/14 (2015). Ryanair Ltd v. PR Aviation BV.
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=161388&doclang=EN
[4]  Case C-5/08 (2009). Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening. Eu ZW 655.
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-5/08
[5]  Caspers, M., Guibault, L., McNeice, K., Piperidis, S., Pouli, K., Eskevich, M., & Gavriilidou, M. (2016). Reducing Barriers and Increasing Uptake of Text and Data Mining for Research Environments Using a Collaborative Knowledge and Open Information Approach. Baseline Report of Policies and Barriers of TDM in Europe.
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/197301_en.html
[6]  De Wolf & Partners (2014). Study on the Legal Framework of Text and Data Mining (TDM). European Union.
https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/074ddf78-01e9-4a1d-9895-65290705e2a5/language-en
[7]  European Commission & COM 192 Final (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions, a Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. Document: 52015DC0192, Brussels.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2015%3A192%3AFIN
[8]  European Commission & SWD 301 Final Part 1/3 (2016). Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment on the Modernization of EU Copyright Rules.
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/impact-assessment-modernisation-eu-copyright-rules
[9]  European Commission & SWD 301 Final Part 2/3 (2016). Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment on the Modernization of EU Copyright Rules. Brussels.
https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/10102/2016/EN/SWD-2016-301-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-2.PDF
[10]  European Commission & SWD 302 Final (2016). Commission Staff Working Document, Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment, on the Modernization of EU Copyright Rules. Document: 52016SC0302, Brussels.
http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/10102/2016/EN/SWD-2016-302-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF
[11]  European Copyright Society (2017). General Opinion on the EU Copyright Reform Package.
https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ECS_opinion_on_EU_copyright_reform.pdf
[12]  Frascati Manual (2002). Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264199040-en.pdf?expires=1542611355&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=39B756986E0ECF728154E3785B2AA363
[13]  Geiger, C., Frosio, G., & Bulayenko, O. (2018). The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market-Legal Aspects. Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160586
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2018/604941/IPOL_IDA(2018)604941_EN.pdf
[14]  Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32563/ipreview-finalreport.pdf
[15]  Hargreaves, I., Guibault, L., Handke, C., Martens, B., Lynch, R., & Filippov, S., (2014). Standardisation in the Area of Innovation and Technological Development, Notably in the Field of Text and Data Mining—Report from the Expert Group. European Union.
[16]  IFLA (2013). IFLA Statement on Text and Data Mining.
https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/8225
[17]  Kallinikou, D. (2008). ΠνευματικηΙδιοκτησια και Συγγενικá Δικαιωματα (Copyright and Related Rights). Athens: P.N. Sakkoulas.
[18]  Knights, R. (2000). Limitations and Exceptions under the “Three-Step Test” and in National Legislation—Differences between the Analog and Digital Environments. WIPO/ DA/MVD/00/4, 1-18.
https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/wipo_da_mvd_00/wipo_da_mvd_00_4.pdf
[19]  Marinos, M. T. (2003). Περιορισμοι και εξαιρεσεις απó το δικαιωμα πνευματικηςιδιοκτη- σηας—Ερμηνεα καιελεγχος των τριων βημáτων (Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright—Analysis and Application of the Three-Step-Test). In M. T. Marinos (Ed.). Κοινωνια Πληροφοριων και ΠνευματικηΙδιοκτησια—Η ελληνικηρúθμιση (Information Society and Copyright Law—The Hellenic Rule). Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas Publications.
[20]  Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (2016). Position Statement on the Proposed Modernisation of European Copyright Rules. Research Paper No. 17-12.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036787
[21]  Reilly, B.F. (2012). When Machines Do Research, Part 2: Text-Mining and Libraries.
[22]  Sag, M. (2009). Copyright and Copy-Reliant Technology. Northwestern University Law Review, 103, 1607-1682.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1257086
[23]  Sag, M. (2019). The New Legal Landscape for Text Mining and Machine Learning. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 66.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3331606
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3331606
[24]  Smit, E., & Van der Graaf, M. (2011). Journal Article Mining 2011: A Research Study into Practices, Policies, Plans.....and Promises. Publishing Research Consortium, Amsterdam.
http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/128-prc-projects/research-reports/journal-article-mining-research-report/160-journal-article-mining
[25]  Stamatoudi, I. (2016). Text and Data Mining. In I. Stamatoudi (Ed.) New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Kluwer Law International (pp. 251-282).
[26]  Supreme Court of the United States (1994). Case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 U.S. 569.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1292.ZO.html
[27]  Tsolakidou, E. (2018). Word and Document Embeddings: An Application in the Greek Language. Master Thesis, Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
http://geolib.geo.auth.gr/index.php/grelit/article/view/12320
[28]  United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (2014). Case Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87, 97-98 (2d Cir. 2014).
https://casetext.com/case/authors-guild-inc-v-hathitrust-1
[29]  United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (2015). Case Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F.3d 202.
https://scholar.google.gr/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google,+Inc.,+804+F.+3d+202&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1
[30]  Walter, M., & Lewinski, S. (2010). European Copyright Law—A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[31]  World Intellectual Property Organization (1996). WIPO Copyright Treaty. Geneva.
http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html
[32]  World Intellectual Property Organization (1996). WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. Geneva.
http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/trtdocs_wo034.html

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133