Reservoir connectivity is a critical issue in the process of oil-gas exploration and development. According to the theory of fluid mechanics and the achievements of many scholars, a connected reservoir coincides with a unified formation pressure system; there is a linear relationship between formation pressure and depth in normal pressure system reservoir. However, in high-permeability or multi-phase fluid reservoirs, this method has poor applicability and limitations. Through theoretical analysis and formula derivation, a new method for judging the connectivity of normal pressure reservoirs is found, that is, the inverse proportional function relationship between the pressure coefficient and the depth. In this paper, the relationship between the pressure system and the inverse proportional function has been verified. The function of the same pressure system is unique, monotonic, and has unified asymptote and symmetry axis and vice versa. Examples show that the inverse proportional function is more accurate and reliable for judging reservoir connectivity than the linear function.
References
[1]
Zhao, C.M., Wang, S.P., Liu, W.Y., et al. (2009) Application of FMT Pressure Analysis in Reserves Estimate of Bohai J25-1 Oilfield. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 16, 85-87.
[2]
Zoback, M.D. (2007) Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press, New York, 3-55.
[3]
Liu, C.Q., Lv, D.Y., Hou, D.M., et al. (2008) Study of Connectivity of Sand Bodies in A, Bohai Area. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 47, 251-255.
[4]
Wang, C.X., Cao, W.L. and Wang, X.R. (2008) Pressure Gradient Computation and Application of Wireline Formation Tester. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 35, 476-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(08)60096-8
[5]
Wu, Y.P., Meng, X.M., Hu, S.M., et al. (2015) Reservoir Connectivity and Availability of Dina 2 Gas Field. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 28, 43-46.
[6]
Li, C.L. (2005) Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 5-7.
[7]
Shaker, S.S. (2014) Reservoir vs. Seal Pressure Gradients: Calculations and Pitfalls. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, AAPG 2014 Annual Convention and Exhibition, Omnipress, Houston, 1834685.
[8]
Shaker, S.S. (2005) Geopressure Compartmentalization in Keathley Can You Deep Water, Gulf of Mexico. Comparative Drama, 39, 131-156.
[9]
Pan, F.X. (2012) Research of the ERCT Wireline Formation Tester Application. World Well Logging Technology, 2012, 45-48.
[10]
Ma, J.G. and Fu, Z.J. (1995) Principles and Applications of Wireline Formation Tester. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 1-174.
[11]
Chen, Y.S. and Tan, T.D. (1990) The Pressure Log Reference Manual-Theory and Evaluation of Formation Pressure. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 1-157.
[12]
Kuang, L.C. (2005) An Introduction to Applied of the Wireline Formation Data. Petroleum Industry Pressure, Beijing, 1-140.
[13]
Kuang, L.C., Mao, Z.Q., Sun, Z.C., et al. (2003) Reservoir Synthetic Evaluation Based on New Logging Technology. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 30, 58-60.
[14]
Course Materials Research Institute (2008) Mathematics (Grade Eight). The Peoples Education Press, Beijing, 38-62.
[15]
Wu, Y.J. (2004) Reservoir Geology. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 26-28.
[16]
Guo, C., Zhang, J.M., Zhu, J.M., et al. (2016) Fine Characterization of Fluvial Reservoirs under the Condition of Limited Well in Offshore Oilfield: A Case Study from the Sand Body 3-1483 of Kenli3-2 Oilfield. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 40, 10-17.
