全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Occupational Noise Dose Reduction via Behavior Modification Using In-Ear Dosimetry among United States Air Force Personnel Exposed to Continuous and Impulse Noise

DOI: 10.4236/ojsst.2019.92005, PP. 61-81

Keywords: Field-Microphone in Real Ear, Hearing Protection, In-Ear Dosimetry, Noise

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In-ear dosimetry and noise exposure feedback were used to modify worker attitude and behavior regarding hearing protection use. The study specifically addressed whether providing in-ear noise exposure data to workers resulted in a reduction in average noise dose rate equivalent continuous levels. Nineteen combat arms instructors (impulse noise group) and heavy equipment operators (continuous noise group) working for the United States Air Force volunteered to participate in a six-month field study using in-ear dosimeters to collect daily noise level data. Participants served as their own control group, receiving periodic noise exposure feedback reports in the latter half of the study only. The control and feedback phase noise exposure data were examined using analysis of variance for differences that could be indicative of more effective hearing protection device use. Additionally, a 7-point Likert survey was used to monitor worker attitude towards hearing protection use, and worker medical histories were examined for evidence of previous hearing loss. Overall, this research found a significant reduction in noise dose rate equivalent continuous level (-2.5 dB with p = 0.019) for the continuous noise group following periodic noise exposure feedback on in-ear noise levels. This effect was not detected at the individual level due to limited samples. No effect was detected in the impulse noise population, likely due to limitations of dosimeter technology in response to impulse noise. No correlation between worker attitudes towards hearing protection and noise dose rate equivalent continuous level was detected for either group (continuous p = 0.249; impulse p = 0.478). While workers reported that in-ear dosimeters and noise exposure feedback helped them control their exposures, few reported using immediate feedback functions to control noise exposures within a work shift. These results indicate that in-ear dosimetry and noise exposure feedback could provide an effective tool to reduce worker noise exposures over time. However, advances in dosimeter technology are necessary before it can be evaluated for impulse noise. Additionally, further research is necessary to understand the link between worker attitude and hearing protection device use.

References

[1]  Canadian Department of National Defence (2015) A Comparison of Metrics for Impulse Noise Exposure Analysis of Noise Data from Small Calibre Weapons, by A. Nakashima (Report #DRDC-RDDC-2015-R243). Defence Research and Development Canada, November 2015.
[2]  Smalt, C.J., Lacirignola, J., Davis, S.K., Calamia, P.T. and Collins, P.P. (2017) Noise Dosimetry for Tactical Environments. Hearing Research, 349, 42-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.008
[3]  Michael, K., Tougaw, E. and Wilkinson, R. (2011) Role of Continuous Monitoring in a Hearing Conservation Program. Noise and Health, 13, 195-199.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.77204
[4]  Neitzel, R.L., Galusha, D., Dixon-Ernst, C. and Rabinowitz, P.M. (2014) Methods for Evaluating Temporal Trends in Noise Exposure. International Journal of Audiology, 53, S76-S83.
https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.857438
[5]  Rabinowitz, P.M., Galusha, D., Kirsche, S.R., Cullen, M.R., Slade, M.D. and Dixon-Ernst, C. (2011) Effect of Daily Noise Exposure Monitoring on Annual Rates of Hearing Loss in Industrial Workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 68, 414-418.
https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2010.055905
[6]  McTague, M.F., Galusha, D., Dixon-Ernst, C., Kirsche, S.R., Slade, M.D., Cullen, M.R. and Rabinowitz, P.M. (2013) Impact of Daily Noise Exposure Monitoring on Occupational Noise Exposures in Manufacturing Workers. International Journal of Audiology, 52, S3-S8.
https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.743047
[7]  Rabinowitz, P.M., Galusha, D., Dixon-Ernst, C., Clougherty, J.E. and Neitzel, R.L. (2013) The Dose-Response Relationship between In-Ear Occupational Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 70, 716-721.
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2011-100455
[8]  Kirchner, D.B., Evenson, E., Dobie, R.A., Rabinowitz, P., Crawford, J., Kopke, R. and Hudson, T.W. (2012) Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 54, 106-108.
https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318242677d
[9]  Davis, S.K., Calamia, P.T., Murphy, W.J. and Smalt, C.J. (2019) In-Ear and On-Body Measurements of Impulse-Noise Exposure. International Journal of Audiology, 58, S49-S57.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1534012
[10]  Rocha, C.H., Longo, I.A., Moreira, R.R. and Samelli, A.G. (2016) Evaluation of the Hearing Protector in a Real Work Situation Using the Field-Microphone-in-Real-Ear Method. CoDAS, 28, 99-105.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162014146
[11]  Champion, V.L. and Skinner, C.S. (2008) The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K. and Viswanath, K., Eds., Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Practice, and Research, 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 45-62.
[12]  Quick, B.L., Stephenson, M.T., Witte, K., Vaught, C., Booth-Butterfield, S. and Patel, D. (2008) An Examination of Antecedents to Coal Miners’ Hearing Protection Behaviors: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 39, 329-338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.032
[13]  Petty, R.E., Fabrigar, L.R. and Wegener, D.T. (2003) Emotional Factors in Attitude and Persuasion. In: Davidson, R.J., Scherer, K.R. and Goldsmith, H.H., Eds., Handbook of Affective Sciences, Oxford University Press, Cary, 752-772.
[14]  Millar, M.G. and Tesser, A. (1986) Effects of Affective and Cognitive Focus on the Attitude Behavior Relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270-276.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.270
[15]  Millar, M.G. and Tesser, A. (1989) The Effects of Affective-Cognitive Consistency and Thought on the Attitude-Behavior Relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189-202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90012-7
[16]  Crites, S.L., Fabrigar, L.R. and Petty, R.E. (1994) Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619-634.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294206001
[17]  Norman, R. (1975) Affective-Cognitive Consistency, Attitudes, Conformity, and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 83-91.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076865
[18]  Lavine, H., Thomsen, C.J., Zanna, M.P. and Borgida, E. (1998) On the Primacy of Affect in the Determination of Attitudes and Behavior: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398-421.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1357
[19]  Haddock, G., Maio, G.R., Arnold, K. and Huskinson, T. (2008) Should Persuasion Be Affective or Cognitive? The Moderating Effects of Need for Affect and Need for Cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 769-778.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208314871
[20]  Ivanov, B., Pfau, M. and Parker, K.A. (2009) The Attitude Base as a Moderator of the Effectiveness of Inoculation Strategy. Communication Monographs, 76, 47-72.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802682471
[21]  Schleicher, D.J., Watt, J.D. and Greguras, G.J. (2004) Reexamining the Job Satisfaction-Performance Relationship: The Complexity of Attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 165-177.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.165
[22]  U.S. Air Force (USAF) (2016) Occupational Noise and Hearing Conservation Program (AFI 48-127). USAF, Washington DC.
https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_sg/publication/afi48-127/afi48-127.pdf
[23]  Soderlund, L.L., McKenna, E.A., Tastad, K. and Paul, M. (2016) Prevalence of Permanent Threshold Shifts in the United States Air Force Hearing Conservation Program by Career Field, 2005-2011. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 13, 383-392.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1123814
[24]  Veterans Benefits Administration (2018) Compensation. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC.
https://www.benefits.va.gov/REPORTS/abr/docs/FY17-Compensation.pdf

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133