This paper will use the concept of hyperreality to compare the so-called ideal state described by ancient Chinese philosopher Laozi with the world of The Truman Show. The concept of hyperreality is defined by Jean Baudrillard as the generation by models of a real without origin or reality. A hyperreal world is a simulation, or kind of a copy without its original. It is generally accepted, and confirmed by Baudrillard himself, that the world of The Truman Show is hyperreal. In order to compare Laozi’s ideal state with the world of the film, this paper will give a hyperrealist interpretation of the former, which will be only hypothetical, without intending to substitute any other existing interpretations. Laozi imagines that people live simple lives, with few desires and without traveling to other places. If we accept that the ideal state is a hyperreal world, we can make comparison between the two worlds; find out their similarities, as well as differences.
References
[1]
Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (2003). Daodejing—“Making This Life Significant”: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Balantine Books.
[2]
Ames, R. T. (1994). The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. New York: State University of New York Press.
[3]
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904
[4]
Chan, A. (2001, substantive revision 2013). Laozi. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/laozi/
[5]
Chan, W.-T. (Transl. & Comp.) (1973). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[6]
Chen, G., & Bai, X. (2002). Laozi Pingchuan (A Commentary on Laozi). Taipei: Wenshizhe.
[7]
Coulter, G. (2010). Jean Baudrillard and Cinema: The Problems of Technology, Realism and History. Film-Philosophy, 14, 6-20. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2010.0041
[8]
Deleuze, G. (1990). The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia University Press.
[9]
Eco, U. (1986). Travels in Hyperreality. Orlando FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
[10]
Fu, P. (2003). Jiedu Laozi (Reading Laozi). Taipei: Lixu Wenhua.
[11]
Fung, Y.-L. (1997). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York: The Free Press.
[12]
Hansen, C. (1992). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
[13]
Laist, R. (2015). Cinema of Simulation: Hyperreal Hollywood in the Long 1990s. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
[14]
Lau, D. C. (1963). Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. New York: Penguin.
[15]
Lin, P. J. (Transl.) (1992). A Translation of Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching and Wang Pi’s Commentary. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Chinese Studies.
[16]
Roberts, M. (Transl.) (2001). Laozi Dao De Jing: The Book of the Way. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[17]
Schwartz, B. (1985). The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[18]
Shen, V. (2003). Laozi (Lao Tzu). In A. S. Cua (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy (pp. 355-361). New York and London: Routledge.
[19]
Slingerland, E. (2003). Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20]
Stamatov, A. (2014). The Laozi and Anarchism. Asian Philosophy, 24, 260-278.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2014.960296
[21]
Stamatov, A. (2017). The Laozi’s Criticism of Government and Society and a Daoist Criticism of the Modern State. Asian Philosophy, 27, 127-149.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2017.1319782
[22]
Waley, A. (Transl.). (1997). Lao Tzu Tao Te Ching. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.
