Conceptual-Network-Based Theory of Science (CNBTS) is presented. It is confronted with the existing philosophies of science rather than with particular scientific theories. The conceptual network, constituting the “substance” of the human psyche, is composed of continuous concepts meaning by connotation. Concepts representing certain aspects of the reality are of completely different nature, than these aspects themselves. Nevertheless, the structure of the conceptual network of science is more or less isomorphic with the structure of the external world (semi-representative realism). The collective conceptual network of science is in a sense a less determined (less precise, more vague) sum, mean or resultant of the individual conceptual networks of particular scientists. During the science development, its conceptual network entwines the physical reality, as a spider web entwines a stony sculpture. The appearance of new theories, paradigms and research programmes consists in a development of new, differently structured fragments (conceptual maps) of the conceptual network of science. Scientific theories and hypotheses cannot be entirely true or false. They can only adhere better or worse to (various aspects of) the external reality, and the progress in science consists in an increase of the degree of this adherence. Hitherto well-working theories cannot be falsified, but only replaced with theories that are more isomorphic with, adhere better to vaster areas of reality.
References
[1]
Ayer, A. J. (1959). Logical Positivism. Glencoe: Free Press.
[2]
Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What Is This Thing Called Science? St. Lucia: Queensland University Press.
[3]
Chalmers, D. J. (1997). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Philosophy of Mind). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4]
Greene, B. (2005). The Fabric of the Cosmos, Space, Time and the Texture of Reality. New York: Vintage.
[5]
Hume, D. (1975). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[6]
Kant, I. (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Korzeniewski, B. (2010). From Neurons to Self-Consciousness. How the Brain Generates the Mind. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.
[8]
Korzeniewski, B. (2013a). Formal Similarities between Cybernetic Definition of Life and Cybernetic Model of Self-Consciousness: Universal Definition/Model of Individual. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 314-328. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.32049
[9]
Korzeniewski, B. (2013b). Magic of Language. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 455-465.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.34067
[10]
Korzeniewski, B. (2014). Philosophy of Conceptual Network. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 451-491. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.44050
[11]
Korzeniewski, B. (2015). Mind-Body Problem: Does Complexity Exist Objectively? Open Journal of Philosophy, 5, 351-364. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2015.56043
[12]
Korzeniewski, B. (2016). Freezing of Reality: Is Flow of Time Real? Open Journal of Philosophy, 6, 256-264. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.63025
[13]
Korzeniewski, B. (2017). Does Matter Matter? Should We Mind the Mind? Can Philosophy Be Reduced to Neurophysiology? Open Journal of Philosophy, 7, 265-328.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2017.73017
[14]
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[15]
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434.009
[16]
Penrose, R. (2002). The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[17]
Popper, K. (1968). Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
[18]
Popper, K. (1978). Three Worlds. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
[19]
Preston, A. Analytic Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://www.iep.utm.edu/analytic
[20]
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[21]
Russell, B. (1912). Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[22]
Salmon, W. C. (1975). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
[23]
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
[24]
Tarski, A. (1935). The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages. In A. Tarski (Ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (pp. 152-278). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
[25]
Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Routlege.
[26]
Whorf, B. L. (1940). Science and Linguistics. Technology Review, 42, 229-231.
[27]
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.
