The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)’s Web Based Accident Prediction System (WBAPS) is used by federal, state and local agencies to get a preliminary idea on safety at a rail-highway grade crossing. It is an interactive and user-friendly tool used to make funding decisions. WBAPS is almost three decades old and involves a three-step approach making it difficult to interpret the contribution of the variables included in the model. It also does not directly account for regional/local developments and technological advancements pertaining to signals and signs implemented at rail-highway grade crossings. Further, characteristics of a rail-highway grade crossing vary by track class which is not explicitly considered by WBAPS. This research, therefore, examines and develops a method and models to estimate crashes at rail-highway grade crossings by track class using regional/local level data. The method and models developed for each track class as well as considering all track classes together are based on data for the state of North Carolina. Linear, as well as count models based on Poisson and Negative Binomial (NB) distributions, was tested for applicability. Negative binomial models were found to be the best fit for the data used in this research. Models for each track class have better goodness of fit statistics compared to the model considering data for all track classes together. This is primarily because traffic, design, and operational characteristics at rail-highway grade crossings are different for each track class. The findings from statistical models in this research are supported by model validation.
References
[1]
Angels on Track Foundation (2013) Railroad Crossing Facts.
http://www.angelsontrack.org/cts/ctsfacts.html
The Urban Institute (1991) The Costs of Highway Crashes. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Research Report# FHWA-RD-91-055, Washington, DC.
[4]
Farr, E.H. (1987) Summary of the DOT Rail-Highway Crossing Resource Allocation Procedure (Revised Edition). FRA, United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Transportation System Center, DOT/FRA/OS-87/05, Cambridge MA.
[5]
McCollister, G.M. and Pflaum, C.C. (2007) A Model to Predict the Probability of Highway Rail Crossing Accidents. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 221, 321-329.
https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT84
[6]
Mutabazi, M.I. and Berg, W.D. (1995) Evaluation of Accuracy of US DOT Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Accident Prediction Models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1495, 166-170.
[7]
Austin, R.D. and Carson, J.L. (2002) An Alternative Accident Prediction Model for Highway-Rail Interfaces. Accident Analysis & Prevention Journal, 34, 31-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00100-7
[8]
Saccomanno, F.F., Fu, L. and Miranda-Moreno, L.F. (2004) Risk-Based Model for Identifying Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Blackspots. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1862, 127-135.
https://doi.org/10.3141/1862-15
[9]
Oh, J., Washington, S.P. and Nam, D. (2006) Accident Prediction Model for Railway-Highway Interfaces. Accident Analysis & Prevention Journal, 38, 346-356.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.004
[10]
Nam, D. and Lee, J. (2006) Accident Frequency Model Using Zero Probability Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1973, 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197300117
[11]
Hu, S.R. and Lee, C.K. (2008) Analysis of Accident Risk at Railroad Grade Crossing. Proceeding of the Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
[12]
Lavette, R.A. (1977) Development and Application of a Railroad-Highway Accident-Prediction Equation. Report # HS-022 157.
[13]
Park, Y.-J. and Saccomanno, F.F. (2005) Evaluating Factors Affecting Safety at Highway-Railway Grade Crossings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1918, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105191800101
[14]
Park, Y.-J. and Saccomanno, F.F. (2005) Collision Frequency Analysis Using Tree-Based Stratification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1908, 121-129.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190800115
[15]
Saccomanno, F.F. and Lai, X. (2005) A Model for Evaluating Countermeasures at Highway-Railway Grade Crossings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1918, 18-25.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105191800103
[16]
Saccomanno, F.F., Park, P.J.Y. and Fu, L. (2007) Estimating Countermeasure Effects for Reducing Collisions at Highway-Railway Grade Crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention Journal, 39, 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.016
[17]
Yan, X., Richards, S. and Su, X. (2010) Using Hierarchical Tree-Based Regression Model to Predict Train-Vehicle Crashes at Passive Highway-Rail Grade Crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention Journal, 42, 64-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.003
[18]
Eck, R.W. and Halkias, J.A. (1985) Further Investigation of the Effectiveness of Warning Devices at Rail-Highway Grade Crossings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1010, 94-101.
Allison, P. (2012) Do We Really Need Zero-Inflated Models. Statistical Horizons.
http://www.statisticalhorizons.com/zero-inflated-models
[21]
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 236—Rules, Standards, and Instructions Governing the Installation, Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair of Signal And Train Control Systems, Devices, and Appliances.
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=e3336df9eea4aced3db461fccf707192&rgn
=div5&view=text&node=49:4.1.1.1.30&idno=49