全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Characterizing Lake Bottom Sediments Using Marine Geophysical Tools

DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2019.103019, PP. 328-350

Keywords: Marine Electrical Resistivity, Side Scan Sonar, Characterize Sediments, Water Depth, Fractures, Missouri

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Missouri is a state with rich karst terrain. Geotechnical evaluation of foundation design for bridges and dams requires an understanding of the characteristics of subsurface geological environment, including sediments, bedrock and benthic habitat. It is crucial that the community empowers itself with the knowledge of the karst system’s characteristics in order to potentially use it as a source of water and drainage, but also to avoid the disaster of building constructions too close to vulnerable land on top of massive karst caverns. Electrical resistivity tomography profiling (underwater cables), and continuous resistivity profiling (towed cable) surveys were conducted to characterize the lake sediments (rock and soil) beneath the man-made Little Prairie Lake, in Central of Missouri State, United States. Electrical resistivity (with marine cables and towed cable) was used to determine variability in the lithology and thickness of sediments (soil and rock) beneath the lake with conjunction of echo sounder in order to calculate water depth. Side scan sonar was used to map the variations in the lithology/nature of exposed lakebed sediments and to locate the potential hazard of trees. On land, electrical resistivity tomography was used with multi-channel analysis of surface wave method to determine sediments, joints, and the depth of bedrock. Analyses of the acquired data revealed the location and orientation of the original stream channels (prior to the construction of the earth fill dam). Underwater electrical resistivity tomography and continuous resistivity profiling determined joints, sediments, and bedrock underneath water bodies. Integrated marine geophysical tools help to evaluate the subsurface prior to any construction project (dam or bridge), are useful in determining the characteristics of lithology (fractured rock, intact rock and soil), and make it possible to map benthic habitat and the submerged potential hazards of trees on the lakebed as well as accurately measuring water depth.

References

[1]  Elliott, W.R. (2010) Below Missouri Karst. Missouri Department of Conservation.
http://mdc.mo.gov/conmag/2000/03/below-missouri-karst
[2]  Fluery, S. (2009) Land Use Policy and Practice on Karst Terrains: Living on Limestone. Springer, Berlin.
[3]  Robertson, J. (2013) The Science of Sinkholes. United States Geological Survey.
http://www.usgs.gov/blogs/features/usgs_top_story/the-science-of-sinkholes
[4]  Williams, J.H. and Vineyard, J.D. (1976) Geologic Indicators of Subsidence and Collapse in Karst Terrain in Missouri. In: 55th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 31-37.
[5]  Reger, J.P. (2012) Foundation Engineering Problems and Hazards in Karst Terrains. Maryland Geological Survey, Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
http://www.mgs.md.gov/geology/geohazards/engineering_problems_in_karst.html
[6]  Van Beynen, P. (2011) Karst Management. Springer, Berlin.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1207-2
[7]  Xeidakis, G.S., Torok, A., Skias, S. and Kleb, B. (2004) Engineering Geological Problems Associated with Karst Terrains: Their Investigation, Monitoring, and Mitigation and Design of Engineering Structures on Karst Terrains. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 36, 1932-1942.
https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16679
[8]  Palmer, Arthur, Palmer, Margaret and Sasowsky, I. (1999) Karst Modeling. Karst Waters Institute.
[9]  Šumanovac, F. and Weisser, M. (2001) Evaluation of Resistivity and Seismic Methods for Hydrogeological Mapping in Karst Terrains. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 47, 13-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00044-1
[10]  Nitsche, F.O., Bell, R., Carbotte, S.M., Ryan, W.B.F. and Flood, R. (2004) Process-Related Classification of Acoustic Data from the Hudson River Estuary. Marine Geology, 209, 131-145.
[11]  Rollet, N., Logan, G.A., Ryan, G., Judd, A.G., Totterdell, J.M., Glenn, K., Jones, A.T., Kroh, F., Struckmeyer, H.I.M., Kennard, J.M. and Earl, K.L. (2009) Shallow Gas and Fluid Migration in the Northern Arafura Sea (Offshore Northern Australia). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26, 129-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.07.010
[12]  Passaro, S. (2010) Marine Electrical Resistivity Tomography for Shipwreck Detection in Very Shallow Water: A Case Study from Agropoli (Salerno, Southern Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 1989-1998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.004
[13]  Missiaen, T., Slob, E. and Donselaar, M.E. (2008) Comparing Different Shallow Geophysical Methods in a Tidal Estuary, Verdronken Land van Saeftinge, Western Scheldt, the Netherlands. Geologie En Mijnbouw: Tijdschrift Van Het Nederlandsch Geologisch-Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap, 87, 151.
[14]  Dai, Y.C. (2013) Integrated Application of Marine Geophysical Technology in a Seawall Reinforcement Project. Advanced Materials Research, 1636-1642.
[15]  Negri, S., Margiotta, S., Quarta, T., Castiello, G., Fedi, M. and Florio, G. (2015) Integrated Analysis of Geological and Geophysical Data for the Detection of Man-Made Underground Caves in an Area in Southern Italy. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 77, 52-62.
[16]  Welc, F., Mieszkowski, R., Vrkljan, G.L. and Konestra, A. (2017) An Attempt to Integration of Different Geophysical Methods (Magnetic, GPR and ERT); A Case Study from the Late Roman Settlement on the Island of Rab in Croatia. Studia Quaternaria, 34, 47-59.
[17]  Missouri Department of Conservation, Rolla, Missouri.
[18]  Barks, J.H. (1976) Water-Quality Characteristics of Six Small Lakes in Missouri. Rolla, Missouri Division of Geology and Land Survey Water Resources Report 33, 20 p.
[19]  Missouri Department of Natural Resources, GeoSTRAT Program.
http://dnr.mo.gov/geology/geostrat.htm
[20]  United States Department of Agriculture (2002) Soil Survey of Phelps County, Missouri.
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/missouri/MO161/0/Phelps_MO.pdf
[21]  Heller, R.L. (1954) Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Roubidoux Formation of Missouri. Volume 35 of Reports, Missouri. Division of Geological Survey and Water Resources.
[22]  Savini, A. (2011) Side-Scan Sonar as a Tool for Seafloor Imagery: Examples from the Mediterranean Continental Margin. Sonar Systems. Ed. N.Z. Kolev. Intech.
https://doi.org/10.5772/18375
[23]  Vaduva, F. (2000) Sea Beam Multi Beam Theory Operation. L-3 Communications.
[24]  Thorpe, E. and Thorpe, S. (2011) The Pearson CSAT Manual 2011. Pearson Education India.
[25]  Nueman, S. (2013) What’s Lurking in Your Lake: Sonar Turns up Startling Finds. NPR. Web.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/09/26/226523055/police-getting-help-from-cheap-easy-to-use-side-scan-sonar
[26]  Wightman, W.E., Jalinoos, F., Sirles, P. and Hanna, K. (2003) Application of Geophysical Methods to Highway Related Problems. Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Lakewood, CO, Publication No. FHWA-IF-04-021.
http://www.cflhd.gov/resources/agm.
[27]  Singha, K. and Gorelick, S.M. (2005) Saline Tracer Visualized with Three-Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography: Field-Scale Spatial Moment Analysis. Water Resources Research, 41, W05023.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003460
[28]  Stewart, M.T. (1982) Evaluation of Electromagnetic Methods for Rapid Mapping of Salt-Water Interfaces in Coastal Aquifers. Groundwater, 20, 538-545.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1982.tb01367.x
[29]  Open EI, Geothermal Energy (2015) Exploration Technique: Direct-Current Resistivity Survey.
http://en.openei.org/wiki/Direct-Current_Resistivity_Survey
[30]  Ixblue (2014) Delph Seismic Interpretation.
http://delph.ixblue.com/seismic/interpretation/

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133