Velocity of debris flow is one of the most important characteristics for the protective construction design. Since debris flows are rare events, and observations are conducted only on stations in Russia, Ukraine, Italy, Switzerland, USA, China, Japan and New Zealand, the velocity is calculated rather than measured. Nowadays, a large number of videos with passing debris flows have appeared on the Internet. Scientists can use such video materials to obtain qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the debris flow. Therefore, the aim of our research is an attempt to measure the debris flow velocity using video materials and compare the obtained results with the calculated values using various methods. The debris flow that came down in Firgen, Austria on August 4, 2012 was chosen as the object of our study. The video was carried out from several angles, so it was possible to select a section of the channel, through which we could measure the debris flows waves velocity. In addition, we calculated the velocities of waves by formulas adopted in the regulatory documents and compared with the measured by video values. During the video analysis, debris flow velocities at different sites were observed: minimum—7.2 m/s and maximum—10 m/s. The calculated values varied from 4.5 m/s to 11.4 m/s. Moreover, we applied model of the transport-shear process of debris flow formation developed by Yu. B. Vinogradov. When we were comparing the obtained debris flow discharges with results from Austrian colleagues, we found out that the values were similar to each other. However, internal scatter in the model changed from 151 to 190 m3/s, while in the report of Austrian colleagues the discharges were from 80 to 250 m3/s.
References
[1]
Vinogradova, T.A. and Vinogradov, A.Y. (2017) The Experimental Debris Flows in the Chemolgan River Basin. Natural Hazards, 88, 189-198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2853-z
[2]
Cavalli, M., Marchi, L. and Arattano, M. (2013) Protocol for Debris-flow Monitoring. Technical Report, 30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278897710
[3]
Arattano, M. (2000) Using a Fixed Video Camera to Measure Debris-Flow Surface Velocity, Debris-Flow Hasardz Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Wieczorek & Naeser, 273-281.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258453246
[4]
Theule, J.I., Crema, S., Marchi, L., Cavalli, M. and Comiti, F. (2018) Exploiting LSPIV to Assess Debris-Flow Velocities in the Field. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1-2018
[5]
Li, Y., Liu, J.J., Hu, K.H. and Su, P.C. (2011) Probability Distribution of Measured Debris-Flow Velocity in Jiangjia Gully, Yunnan Province, China. Natural Hazards, 60, 689-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0033-0
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257632651
[6]
Aulitzky, Н. (1989) The Debris Flows of Austria. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 40, 5-13.
[7]
Vinogradov, Yu.B. (1980) Etudes about Mud Streams. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 144.
[8]
OECD (2007) Climate Change in the European Alps Adapting Winter Tourism and Natural Hazards Management: Adapting Winter Tourism and Natural Hazards Management. OECD Publishing, Paris, 136.
[9]
Source: Modified from a Document Provided by Munich Re, Geo Risks Research 01/2006 NatCatSERVISE. https://natcatservice.munichre.com/
[10]
Hübl, J., Eisl, J. and Tadler, R. (2013) Event Documentation 2012, Annual Review of Events. IAN Report 150, Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering (IAN), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vol. 3, 88.
[11]
Kryukov, E.V. and Butenko, V.M. (2013) Dangerous Natural Processes: Manual: Academy of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, 119.
[12]
RD 52.30.238-90 Guide to Debris Flow Stations and Hydrographic Batches. Issue 1. Organization and Conduct of Research on Debris Flow.
[13]
Golubtcov, V.V. (1969) About the Hydraulic Resistance and a Formula for Calculation of Average Speed of a Current of the Mountain Rivers. Questions of Studying of Mudflows, Works, No. 33, 30-43.
[14]
Kazakov, N.A., Gensiorovskii, Yu.V., Kazakova, E.N. and Morozov, G.L. (2013) Mudflow Processes in the Mzymta River Basin (Krasnaya Polyana) and Their Impact on the Territory of Olympic Construction. Geoecology. Engineering Geology, Hydrogeology, Geocryology, No. 6, 516-529.
http://www.fegi.ru/elibrary/articles/glaciology/508-kazakov011/file
[15]
Vinogradov, Yu. and Vinogradov, T. (2010) Mathematical Modeling in Hydrology, Textbook. Academy, Moscow, 304.